http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이봉의 한국공정경쟁연합회 2003 경쟁저널 Vol.- No.97
공정거래법의 실효적 집행을 위해서는 무엇보다도 공적집행을 개선하는 것이 중요하다. 이를 위하여 무엇보다 합리적이고 투명한 절차운영과 이해관계인의 절차상 권리 강화, 경쟁보호라는 목적에 충실하기 위한 공정위의 독립성과 전문성 확보, 그리고 사법심사를 통한 공정위의 재량권 남용 통제의 강화 등이 이루어질 필요가 있다. 아울러 공정거래법의 실효적 집행은 절차법만의 문제가 아니라, 실체법의 문제이기도 하다는 점을 간과해서는 안 된다. 따라서 집행의 개선논의는 금지기준의 명확성, 타당성 및 목적적합성이라는 실체법적 차원에서도 아울러 접근하여야 한다. 그리고 이러한 실체법의 발전과 합리적인 법 적용이란 공정위의 준 사법 기관성에 걸맞는 경쟁법 전문가의 적극적인 활용에 크게 좌우되는 것임은 물론이다.
입찰담합에 따른 손해액의 산정에 관한 연구 - 계량경제학적 분석의 효용과 한계를 중심으로
이봉의 한국경쟁법학회 2020 競爭法硏究 Vol.41 No.-
Proof of damages in the lawsuit for damages due to violations of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(hereafter “the Act”) is based on the assumption of market conditions. In other words, the calculation of damages is the process of estimating the amount of damages based on probability and statistical methodology based on the hypothetically competitive price that would have existed without collusion. It always has a large room for arbitrary calculation. Therefore, the normative review process is inevitable for the results of econometric analysis. It is the case in the United States, where economic analysis is most actively used in calculating damages. The calculation of the amount of damages due to bid-rigging is to determine the scope of compensation having reasonable causality with the alleged conduct. Even though the econometric analysis is used to estimate the hypothetical competitive price, the process of damage calculation has a very normative character. Econometric methods have their own strengths and weaknesses in each technique, and all of them contain significant uncertainty in the sense that the analytic results can depend on the intention of the analyst. Therefore, it is necessary to find a way to properly utilize the econometric analysis so that the proof of the amount of damages does not become an excessive burden to the victim, taking into account the compensatory character and deterrence effect of the damages claim under the Act. In this context, above all, in the lawsuit for compensation for damages due to bid-ridding, it should be lowered the level of proof of the victim(the plaintiff) about the amount of damages. Here, the key is how to set up a condition that does not require plaintiffs to prove damages solely based on econometric methods from the beginning. It could be considered that as long as there is no obvious flaw, plaintiff could insist on a simple difference according to the comparative market approach or before-and-after method, and the defendant(the conspirators), should rebut based on the fact that other factors besides collusion, have influenced the bid price. Such a method does not need any amendment to the Act and could be taken into account in the process of damages calculation by the court.