케네스 버크와 미셸 푸코의 언어관 비교

이명균 ( Lee Myung-kyun ) 대한영어영문학회 1999 영어영문학연구 Vol.25 No.1

Burke’s stature in contemporary rhetorical theory is so obvious and naturalized that thinking of him as the chief architect of the New Rhetoric is commonplace. His writings sanctioned critical pluralism, opening the door to the development of a plethora of critical methods. To read Foucault seriously is to question the boundaries and relationships traditionally drawn between rhetorical theory and rhetorical practice. In at least some of his critical interpretations, Burke assumes a rather standard humanistic stance. For him, a text is a reflection or representation of its creator. Foucault has been praised and blamed for holding an antihumanist position not only because of his stance on authorship, but also because of his observations about the impending end of man. Burke and Foucault both attempt to locate the conditions for historical change or discontinuity. For both thinkers, history and criticism are virtually synonymous. While Burke focuses his attention on intrinsic understanding of human with symbolic action, Foucault does on extrinsic understanding of human with discourse or discursive practice. Burke’s and Foucault’s projects differ enormously, but they both resound with the same invitations to think differently, and to consider what our criticism will be for.

Kafka 서버 도입을 통한 AMI 저·고압 통합 시스템 성능 개선 방안

이명균(Myung-kyun Lee),주영준(Yeong-jun Ju) 대한전기학회 2023 대한전기학회 학술대회 논문집 Vol.2023 No.7

고층 건축물 마감공사를 위한 건설용 리프트 계획 및 관리 통합형 양중모델

이명도(Lee, Myung-Do),원명균(Won, Myeong-Kyun),이웅균(Lee, Ung-Kyun),조훈희(Cho, Hun-Hee),강경인(Kang, Kyung-In) 대한건축학회 2014 大韓建築學會論文集 : 構造系 Vol.30 No.5

The objective of this study is to propose an integrated lifting model of planning and operation for finishing works in tall building construction. The model consists of five components: lifting schedule chart, lifting load leveling, lifting equipment planning, lifting TACT and lifting table. The model was designed to provide a more practical lifting planning and operating method for construction managers as well as to cope with unexpected schedule delays. To validate the proposed model, a case study was performed in building a construction project; questionnaires were distributed in order to evaluate its effectiveness compared with the original method. A case study showed the following results. (1) The model is estimated to provide more practical lifting planning alternatives compared with the original method to construction managers. (2) The model can be a valuable management tool in terms of the lifting operation of construction lift. (3) The model can be provide an effective method to cope with unexpected situations through the integration of lifting planning and operation. Therefore, It is expected that the proposed model can be employed as practical means to the planning and operation of construction lift at construction sites.

「진로교육법」입법과정과 그 쟁점에 대한 입법정책적 분석

이명균 ( Lee Myung Kyun ),이일용 ( Lee Il Yong ) 대한교육법학회 2017 敎育 法學 硏究 Vol.29 No.1

이 연구에서는 2015년 6월 22일 제정된「진로교육법」의 입법과정과 입법과정에서의 쟁점을 분석하였다. 교육입법정책 과정 및 쟁점 분석모형을 개발하여 분석준거로 적용하였다. 연구문제는「진로교육법」, 동법 시행령·시행규칙은 어떠한 입법과정을 거쳐 제정되었는가와 입법과정에서의 쟁점은 무엇인가로 설정하였다. 「진로교육법」입법과정 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 입법정책 최대 의제는 별도 법률의 제정 필요성이었다. 둘째, 입법정책의 중요 의제는 사회와 정책 변화 등 입법상황이었다. 셋째, 입법정책 결정에서 중요 과정은 입법정보 분석을 통한 입법계획 수립이었다. 넷째, 법률안 준비과정에서 행정부와 입법부 간 협력체제가 중요 요인이었다. 다섯째, 입법 대안선택 및 집행에서 가장 중요한 과정은 국회 소관 위원회 및 소위원회의 법률안 심사과정이었다. 입법과정에서의 쟁점 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 입법목적 규정에 추상적이거나 모호한 표현을 지양하고 법률이 지향하는 목표를 명확하게 규정할 것, 둘째, 입법절차에 있어 국회 소관 위원회의 입법예고제 실시와 공청회 활성화가 필요하며 이를 위해 국회법 중 관련 규정을 개정하고 국민의 입법과정 참여를 제고할 것, 셋째, 입법체계면에서 다른 법률과 충돌하지 않도록「진로교육법」제3조를 보완하고, 하위 법령위임이 과다하여 행정권 남용이 우려되므로 보다 구체적으로 규정할 것, 넷째, 입법내용면에서「진로교육법」이 조성법으로서 활성화되도록 조문을 명확하게 규정하고, 임의 규정을 축소할 것, 다섯째, 적용 대상인 학생에 대한 정의를 명확하게 규정하고, 초·중등학교 진로교육의 목표와 성취기준, 진로전담교사와 지원 전문인력, 진로체험 교육과정 관련 규정의 구체화, 대학의 진로교육 관련 규정을 대폭 보완할 것. The problem of this study are as follows. First, What is the legislative process of Career Education Act? Second, What is the issues of the legislative process of Career Education Act? The analysis model of this study is the process of educational legislative policy in Korea. This study aims to contribute the improvement of legislative process of career education related laws. The main conclusion in the legislative process are as follows. First, the top agenda of the legislative process of Career Education Act is enactment necessity. Second, the critical agenda of the legislative process is the legislative situation such as social change and educational policy change. Third, the critical phase of the legislative process is the legislative planning based on the analysis of legislative information. Fourth, the critical factor of the process of preparation of bills is cooperation relationship between administrative branches and National Assembly. Fifth, the critical process of legislative alternative choice and implementation is the function of National Assembly Committee. And, the main conclusion in the legislative process issues are as follows. First, the objectives of enactment should be prescribed clearly. Second, the previous notice and public hearing of bills should be enforced under the supervision of committee of national assembly. Third, the actor of legislation should prevent the conflict between Career Education Act and other laws. Fourth, the Career Education Act should be prescribed as specific and clear statutes. Fifth, the definition of student should be prescribed clearly. And the statutes of the objectives and achievement criteria of career education, career education teachers, supporters, and the actual curriculum of career education should be prescribed specifically.

논문 : 학교자치론에 기초한 교사회,학부모회 법제 개편 방안 연구

이명균 ( Myung Kyun Lee ) 대한교육법학회 2004 敎育 法學 硏究 Vol.16 No.2

시장논리에 의한 대학교육 개혁의 가능성과 한계

이명균(Myung-Kyun, Lee) 연세대학교 교육연구소 2004 미래교육학연구 Vol.17 No.1

The purpose of this study is to analyse the possibilities and the limitations of higher education reform by the Neo-liberalism logic in knowledge based society. In this study, it was examined the characteristics of higher education reform through the market approaches as the main logic of the Neo-liberalism and researches on knowledge based society. This study results are as follows. First, the possibilities of higher education reform by the logic of market approach could define that the recovery of demander based education, the improvement of competitiveness by evaluations, and the enlargement of educational diversity and special qualities of higher education. Second, the limitations of higher education reform by the logic of market approach could define that the depreciation of educational pubicity, the unbalance of educational opportunities, the lowering qualities and partnership of higher education, and the hindering autonomy of faculties. The significance and implication of this study are that the enlargement analyses and arguments on the higher education reform by the market approaches. 이 논문은 지식기반사회에 있어서 신자유주의 논리에 의한 대학교육 개혁의 가능성과 한계를 규명하는 데 목적이 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위해 신자유주의 논리와 지식기반사회에서의 대학교육 변화의 특정을 검토하였으며, 주요 외국과 국내의 대학교육 개혁 동향을 검토함으로써 시장논리의 대학교육 운영에의 적용 실제를 살펴보았다. 연구결과로서 시장논리에 의한 대학교육 개혁의 가능성으로는, 수요자 중심 교육의 활성화, 대학 및 교수 평가를 통한 경쟁과 정보의 제공, 대학교육의 다양성 추구, 대학교육 서비스의 특성화 도모를, 그 한계로는, 교육의 공공성 저하, 교육기회의 불균형 초래, 대학교육의 양적 비대화와 질적 약화, 대학운영에 대한 공동 노력의 저해, 교수의 자율권 위축 등으로 요약할 수 있다. 이 논문은 지식기반사회에 있어서 시장논리에 의한 대학교육개혁의 방향과 그 정책적 과제를 가늠하고 향후 이에 관한 분석과 논의의 기초를 제공하는 데에 그 의의가 있다.

케네스 버크의 언어론과 문학

이명균 ( Lee¸ Myung-kyun ) 현대영미어문학회 1994 현대영미어문학 Vol.12 No.-

Kenneth Burke defines theology as words about God and logology as words about words. Both theology and logology have relation to words, or language. Logology involves only empirical considerations about our nature as a symbol- using animal. For that very reason it is fascinated by the genius of theology, because many theologians have been so inventive in the ways of symbolic action. When we realize how the nature of our terms affects the nature of our observations, by directing our attention in one way rather than another, we see that the observations are but implications of the particular terminology in which they are represented. There are many notable aspects of language, such as classification or abstraction, which have their analogues in purely nonverbal behavior. But the negative is a peculiarly linguistic resource. Logology inclines to class all religions as examples of a sacrificial principle and also comes to a focus on transformational and generative principles of symbol- systems in general. Logology makes no judgement at all about the truth or falsity of theologic doctrine. Burke believes that, if we analyze and understand the theologic doctrine, we can arrive at a truer understanding of language and even a truer understanding of the human relations. Logology explains the role and the function of literature positively. Deconstruction can be said to have nothing to say about the social work that representation can and does do. but logology has something to say about the social work that representation can. does and must do.

PCL / PLA 블렌드의 물성 및 생분해도에 관한 연구

이명자(Myung Ja Lee),이명천(Myung Cheon Lee),신평균(Pyong Kyun Shin) 한국고분자학회 1998 폴리머 Vol.22 No.1

Kafka 서버 도입을 통한 AMI 저·고압 통합 시스템 성능 개선 방안

이명균(Myung-kyun Lee),주영준(Yeong-jun Ju) 대한전기학회 2023 대한전기학회 학술대회 논문집 Vol.2023 No.7

해체와 케네스 버크

이명균 ( Lee¸ Myung-kyun ) 현대영미어문학회 1995 현대영미어문학 Vol.13 No.-

Kenneth Burke is said to be the foremost critic of our time, and perhaps the greatest critic since S. T. Coleridge. He also has been credited with being the inventor of dramatism, a prefashionable deconstructionist and a founding father of the current movement to reconceive the human sciences in rhetorical terms. Derrida has been described as a French philosopher, an original thinker whose critique of Western philosophy encompasses literature, linguistics and psychoanalysis. Derrida’s work on critical style developed precisely—as Burke’s work has—out of interrogations of the relationship between metaphor and knowledge. For some commentators, Burke an Derrida are philosophic colleagues. Both have been said to function within, be shaped by, and transcend the disciplines of linguistics, communication, philosophy and literature. Both share a critique of the role of metaphor in Western philosophical thought, a critique that informs their own writing as that writing becomes less discursive and more strategically poetic. Burke's chief aim as a literary critic was to integrate all human knowledge into a workable frame. He offered a strategy of dramatism. He also created the idea of logology, which suggests that the human act is made possible only by language. Derrida rejected the view held by Plato that speech is primary to writing. He offered a strategy of deconstruction aimed at making explicit the metaphysical presuppositions that are to be mistrusted and resisted. For both, to do criticism is precisely to mark a crisis and to chart it. They think that criticism’s recovery from crisis would be its death. Criticism in the Burkeian and Derridaian mode aims less at recovery or death of crisis than at sustaining the dis-ease that constitutes the critical condition. It seems that they think tangles and contradiction are the health of society, and the health of art. Burke’s critical tools are designed to reveal the potentialities of the symbolic systems, or the systems of language. Derrida’s task is to unmask false conceptions concealing truth and to reveal manipulative, misleading, convert and subversive uses of language. In Burke’s view, human beings can refashion, control and master society through symbolic manipulations(language). In Derrida’s view, human beings must regain control of their linguistically determined environment, challenge the symbolic systems that oppress and reaffirm the relation between subjectivism and being. I think we had better approach human beings and human society with Derrida's strategy and manage the problems through Burke’s strategy.