http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
北大荒과 띵링 ― 제2회 ‘띵링연구 청년포럼’ 참가 후기
성근제 한국중국현대문학학회 2015 中國現代文學 Vol.0 No.74
The Great Northern Wilderness and Ding Ling: A Review of the Second “Youth Forum for Ding Ling Studies” 이 글은 제2회 '띵링연구 청년포럼'과 띵링이 하방 생활을 했던 북대황의 농장들이 현대적인 농장으로 탈바꿈한 모습에 대한 간략한 보고이다.
성근제 한국중국현대문학학회 2019 中國現代文學 Vol.0 No.91
The article is part of an attempt to take a step closer to understanding the distinct characteristics of China's socialist literary field in the 1950s through consideration of several issues between writer Dingling and the editorial activities of the ‘Wenyibao'. The 1950s is a kind of transitional period in which Chinese revolutionary literature, which has developed in various forms since May 4th, has been institutionalized as official socialist literature. Therefore, in the 1950s, the Chinese literary field has complicated and transitional characteristics, with various literary ideas and practices of before 1949 mixed with the institutionalization demands of socialist literature after 1949. This transitional confusion has also affected the literature and life of a few revolutionary writers, with the case of Dingling being very remarkable. Dingling ends up being branded as a rightist writer due to a series of political events related to the editing activities of the ‘Wenyibao', one of China's key literary journals in the 1950s. The case of Dingling epitomizes the process and cause in which the literary and political views of revolutionary writers nurtured by the Chinese revolution conflict with the institutionalization process of socialist literature. In the course of the research, I particularly noted the uniqueness of the political view and literary view of Dingling. Based on this criticism, I wanted to reveal some problems in the history of contemporary literature written after ‘The Reform and Opening'.
‘東北’인가, ‘滿洲’인가 ― 근대 동북 지역연구과제 설정의 가능성
성근제 한국중국현대문학학회 2011 中國現代文學 Vol.0 No.56
This study intends to examine some basic matters required in the process of setting a research agenda of northeast regional studies as a sub category of history of modern China. For this purpose, this article initially investigates the ambiguity of formation process of ‘Northeast’ concept and its concept category. Based on this initial sketch, the study argues the necessity of a categorical setting that is more open and dynamic without being subordinated by the concept of national state territory. Furthermore, it aims to reveal any conceptual entanglement between ‘Northeast’ and ‘Manchuria’ by pointing out the perspective of centralism hidden in the concept of ‘Northeast’ and also historical limitation in the ‘Manchuria’. This conceptual entanglement reflects the existence of a historical ‘layer’ in the regional history, and this study attempts to figure out the historical process of forming a ‘layer’ by defining it as ‘the decline of Manchuria and appearance of Northeast’. The modern city formation process in the north eastern region represented by Harbin clearly demonstrates the special character in the process of the appearance of Northeast as a modern space. This is another model of modernization different to those of Shanghai and Canton. Accordingly, the creation of Harbin and modern Northeast can be accepted as raising an issue against the writings of current Chinese modern and contemporary history which are linear and centralistic description. Here, the research task for the Northeastern region itself has reached a potential point to overcome the current modern Chinese history beyond a simple regional studies.