RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        스포츠윤리에서 책임성 문제

        남중웅(Joongw Woong Nam),권오륜(Oh Ryun Kwon),이정식(Jung Sik Lee) 한국체육철학회 2001 움직임의철학 : 한국체육철학회지 Vol.9 No.2

        The aim of this research is to explore the meaning of the responsibility in sports ethics and discuss the problem of the ethical responsibility attribution and distribution. The responsibility in sports phenomena questions the ability which participants can rationally and freely choose for themselves. The essence of the responsibility in sports phenomena might change the definition of the responsibility depending upon focusing on the sports participants themselves or the activity of the participants, but nothing can be excluded from participants in sports phenomena. Therefore, the identity of ethical responsibility in sports ethics consists in the presence of the participant and the cause-and effect responsibility can be seen to be included as a part in discussing the responsibility based on this presence. However, when the problem of group responsibility takes place, the identity of responsibility is raised as a solution about it. The ethical responsibility in the traditional sports ethics attributes and distributes the responsibility by questioning only the activity of participants. Right here, when the responsibility problem in sports group takes place, even if we try to distribute the responsibility to the main bodies, we can`t distribute all responsibilities and there happens a problem of some parts among them remaining. Accordingly, to solve this problem, the discussion of sports ethics should be expanded from the problem of participants to that of sports group.

      • KCI등재

        체육학의 동양철학적 접근의 과제

        권오륜(Oh Ryun Kwon),황미숙(Mi Sook Hwang),남중웅(Joongw Woong Nam) 한국체육철학회 2002 움직임의철학 : 한국체육철학회지 Vol.10 No.1

        The new paradigm of Eastern philosophical thoughts is presented in order to find out the harmonious relation between two kinds of thoughts - Eastern and Western thoughts. This effort might be helpful for setting up an ideal goal of physical education which prepares the future society of the 21st century. Also it could be a new vision of physical education for the 21st century. There are clear differences in the views of the world and the human being between Eastern and Western philosophies. The Western philosophy is based on the Descartes` dualism and the Newton`s materialism. On the other hand the Eastern philosophy is founded on the monism and the holistic thinking. This researcher names Ki-physical education which is based on Ki-theory from the view of Eastern philosophy. Ki-physical education could study the view of mind and body, the abdomen breath as the movement of body, the practice and effect of Ki, and the graft of Ki-theory to sports. Even if the materialism of Western philosophy has been studied quantitatively, Ki-physical education has to research in quality. The Eastern philosophy as the new paradigm of physical education makes a demand for lots of efforts and constant research of young researchers. And the researchers must have the ability to understand Chinese sentences. Also in order to active study of physical education on the basis of Eastern philosophy, it`s necessary to translate various special books and increase the number of researchers.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼