http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 공정원 ( Gong Jeong-won ) (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
공정원 ( Gong Jeong-won ) 부산대학교 여성연구소 2019 여성학연구 Vol.29 No.1
본 연구는 지방자치단체에서 제정한 「가족친화조례」의 내용을 규범체계와 집행체계로 구분하여 비교분석하였다. 분석결과, 첫째, 전국적으로 19개 지방자치단체에서 가족친화조례를 제정한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 지방자치단체별로 조례의 규율사항이 비슷하여 지방자치단체의 주요 현안이나 특색을 반영하지 못하였다. 셋째, 규범체계 가운데 목적과 책무규정은 양성평등이나 일·가정양립에 대한 가치를 제대로 표현하지 못하였고, 지원 수준과 범위는 매우 약하거나 구체적이지 못하였다. 또한 가족 친화 사회환경 조성사업 가운데 직장환경 조성사업과 관련된 규정은 많았으나 마을 환경 조성사업에 대한 규정은 상대적으로 빈약하였다. 넷째, 집행체계에서 시행계획은 가족친화법의 규정에 따라 19개 조례에서 모두 규율된 반면 가족친화관련 위원회 규정은 거의 없었으며, 성별균형 조항도 찾을 수 없었다. 또한 가족친화센터에 대한 설치규정이 적을 뿐 아니라 예산 지원과 운영의 근거 규정이 미비한 경우가 많은 것으로 나타났다.이상의 연구결과를 바탕으로 하여 개선방안을 제시하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 양성 평등의 가치를 담아서 「가족친화조례」의 목적 및 책무를 다시 규정할 필요가 있다. 둘째, 지방자치단체의 특색을 반영하여 「가족친화조례」의 규율 내용을 「가족친화법」 보다 더 구체적으로 마련하여야 한다. 셋째, 가족친화 마을환경 조성에 대한 규정을 추가하고 강화해야 한다. 넷째, 지원내용을 더 명확하게 규정하고 지원근거도 함께 제시할 필요가 있다. 다섯째, 전달체계와 관련하여 위원회 구성에서 성별 균형 조항을 명시하고, 가족친화지원센터 설치 운영 및 지원 규정과 근거를 명시할 필요가 있으며, 지나치게 많은 임의규정의 일부라도 강행규정으로 바꿀 필요가 있다. The purpose of this study was to analyze the contents of Family-Friendly Ordinance enacted by local governments by dividing into norm system and executive system. The results of this study are as follows. First, it was found that 19 local governments nationwide have enacted Family-Friendly Ordinance. Second, Family-Friendly Ordinance was were not able to reflect major issues or characteristics of local autonomous entities because their regulations are similar to each other. Third, in normative systems, the purpose and the responsibility regulations did not express properly the value of gender equality and work-family reconciliation and the level and scope of support was very weak or not specific. Also, there were many rules related to the work environment improving project among the family friendly social environment promoting projects, but the regulations about the village or local community environment improving project was relatively few. Fourth, in execution system, the implement plan was presented in all 19 ordinances in accordance with the Family-Friendly Act, but there were few regulations on the committee related to family friendly social environment promoting projects. In addition, there were a few rules for establishing a family-friendly support center and the basis for budget support and operation were insufficient.Based on the above research results, suggestions for improvement are as follows. First, in order to reflect the characteristics of local autonomous entities, the contents of the Family Friendly Ordinance should be more specific and abundant than the Family Friendly Act. Second, it is necessary to redefine the purpose and responsibility regulations of the Family-friendly Ordinance by incorporating the value of gender equality and support for work-family reconciliation. Third, it is necessary to add and strengthen regulations on the establishment of a family - friendly village environment. Fourth, in relation to the support system, it is necessary to clarify the regulations more clearly and to provide the basis of support. Fifth, regarding the delivery system, it is necessary to establish the regulations of the committee and to specify the regulations and the basis for the establishment, operation and support of the family friendly support center. Finally, it is necessary to change some of the voluntary regulations to imperative rules.
-
사회서비스 전달체계로서 협동조합의 의의에 관한 탐색적 연구
공정원 ( Jeong Won Gong ) 한국협동조합학회 2013 韓國協同組合硏究 Vol.31 No.2
This study aims to examine the limitations arising from the marketization of social services and to explore the effectiveness of cooperatives as a social service delivery system. The current market-driven social services diminish the quality of publicness, while resulting in expansion of for-profit organizations, the individualization of service users and the increase of low quality jobs. Cooperatives would resolve these problems, by strengthening the sustainability of social services based on the trust and cooperation of local community members. Furthermore, cooperatives can supply social services that neither state nor market provide and improve their quality by allowing service users to participate in delivering social services. Finally, Cooperatives, especially social cooperatives, will create decent work with living wage for workers and contribute to enhancing social integration for the vulnerable.
-
사회복지정책에서 최저임금과 생활임금의 의의에 관한 탐색적 연구
공정원(Jeong-Won Gong) 충남대학교 사회과학연구소 2015 사회과학연구 Vol.26 No.4
The minimum wage is economic and social policy to ensure a decent life for low-paid workers and to prevent them from poverty. However, the minimum wage became the lowest wages in the labor market, then the original purpose of the introduction was evaporated and working-poverty problems became more serious. A living wage has emerged as an alternative to the minimum wage. As a minimum demand of distributive justice in the capitalist labor market, a living wage is a basic device to escape from social assistance and enjoy a decent life for low-paid workers and their families. If the living wage is not guaranteed in the labor market, political and economic basis of the welfare state will be greatly compromised as well as social assistance costs will be increased. Futhermore, citizenship of the working poor would be weakened. Therefore, the appropriate level of the minimum wage or acceptance of living wage is essential to social policy forward to the Integrated Welfare State (IWS), which economic policy and social policy are not separated but integrated for achieving social goals. Also it will contribute to overcome the concept of social rights that are recognized to divided from the market and will be a strong economic base for consolidating the social rights in the private sector, including the market as well as the public sector.
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
