http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 鄭雲龍(토론자) (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
李鍾洙(LEE Jong-su),鄭雲龍(토론자) 고구려발해학회 2005 고구려발해연구 Vol.21 No.-
Gogyuryeo' s attacks on Buyeo took place two times during the co-existence history of the two countries for about 500 years. The first was the war at the southern part of Jinbbeol region of Buyeo and the second was attack by Gwanggaeto the great of Goguryeo in 410. The result of the first attack was lost to Goguryeo but could expand to Yuha(柳河) and Yonggang(龍崗山) mountain that was under existing control of Buyeo. Castles built or used during this period are Natong(羅通) MT. castle, Joeodae(釣魚臺) old castle of Iltongha(一統河) shore. The result of the second attack by Gwanggaeto the great had accomplished big victory taking most of regions of Buyeo. At that time, Goguryeo took all regions of the former capital of Jilin(吉林) city and Jiaohe(蛟河) city including the latter capital of Yeosung(餘城). Gwanggaeto the great had recognized autonomous government only in Liaoyuan(遼源) city region, the latter capital and for all other regions, dispatched protecting generals for direct control. Castles built or used during this time are total 20 castles and the typical castles are Chengzhisan(城子山山城) MT. castle of Xifeng(西豊), Longtuansan(龍潭山) MT. castle of Jilin city, and Nansan(南山) MT. castle of Jiaohe(蛟河) city. These castles were mainly built or used to prevent the flow of northen Mulgil(勿吉) into the south. The last latter capital of Liaoyan city regions was recognized autonomous government until king of Buyeo, and escaped into Goguryeo in 494 when it finally fell under direct control of Goguryeo. Since then, Goguryeo had built Yongsusan(龍首山) MT. castle to defend more firmly from the southern attack of northem powers like Mulgil(勿吉) in the north.
-
李成制(LEE Seong-je),鄭雲龍(토론자) 고구려발해학회 2004 고구려발해연구 Vol.18 No.-
North Korea has studied the history of Koguryo to meet their political goal of establishing the historical inevitability of their system, which in return has played a Significant part in successfully emphasizing the legitimacy and the superiority of their system. However, the history of Koguryo that the North Korea used to defend and justify their system has been raised up as an issue that might jeopardize their system, as China began to study the history of Koguryo from the perspective of the nationalism. Regarding the history of Koguryo as part of China means shaking the legitimacy of the North Korea to the root in the context of the history of the nation. Although the scholars of the North Korea have greatly emphasized the struggle against the foreign forces and the self reliance of the nation, they have not effectively addressed the issue on the distortion of the history by China, that should be recognized as the matter of a historic consciousness. From that, the abuse is very obvious that the study of Koguryo in the North Korea has attempted to draw unreasonable and framed interpretations and subjugated the description of the history to the political purposes. This has a very special meaning now that both Koreas on the Peninsular have to urgently work hand in hand to stand up to the distortion of the history by China. Obviously it is the catastrophic result from the attempt to hold the 'consciousness of the history' to the hostage of a framed history. Not only the North Korea but also we need to seriously reflect on the limit of our current historic perspective. Moreover, we need to seriously weigh on a new viewpoint and the method of the study that can overcome the limit to the historic consciousness of the North Korea, not just being content with the premise that the consciousness of the born Koreas is far from each other.
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
