美國 反트러스트法上의 合倂規制에 관한 硏究

許悳會 한국기업법학회 1999 企業法硏究 Vol.4 No.-

惡意의 어음取得者와 어음行爲獨立의 原則

허덕회 한국기업법학회 2003 企業法硏究 Vol.12 No.-

Effects of dietary lipid sources on apoptotic and immune gene expression in head kidney of olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus)

허덕회,이상민,홍수희 한국어병학회 2012 한국어병학회지 Vol.25 No.3

It can be hypothesized that dietary fatty acids can modulate immune responses in fish by inducing apoptosis of immune cells since dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) increase apoptosis by oxygen radicals generated by peroxidation. Thus we examined the effects of deferent dietary lipid sources such as squid liver oil (FO), linseed oil (LO) and soybean oil (SO) on oxidation (Cytochrome C oxidase; COS), apoptosis (TNF- Scinderin like) and immune (IL-1 and NKEF) gene expression in the main immune organ (head kidney) in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) by Q-PCR analysis after feeding diets containing each oil (5%) for 15 weeks. Linseed oil and soybean oil were chosen to compare n-3 or n-6 enriched vegetable oils, respectively. Consequently, COS, TNF- and Scinderin like gene expression was increased in SO group, indicating the induction of oxidation and apoptosis. Meanwhile, no significant difference was found in immune gene expression. In conclusion vegetable oils containing n-3 PUFA like linseed oil seems to be more suitable lipid source than soybean oil for replacement of fish oil in flounder since n-6 PUFA in SO leads to activation of apoptosis pathways within the cellular damage in head kidney.

理事의 法令違反行爲에 대한 責任

허덕회 한국상사법학회 2003 商事法硏究 Vol.22 No.1

株式買受請求權에 關한 硏究

許悳會 건국대학교 1993 대학원 학술논문집 Vol.36 No.-

Undoubtedly, the dissident shareholder's right to obtain cash payment out of corporation. So called "appraisal right", serves as another protective criticized by the commentators. Assuminig the usefulness of this right, it wholly depend on the ease and efficiency of the procedure, that is, how to assure the fair value of dissenter's shares in the simplest and cheapest process. So far as Article 191 of the securities code stipulating for this right concerns, it cannot aboid being assessed undesirable in that too excessive stress is put on the market value to take into consideration other factors such as earnings or net asset value, and that valuation process is unnecessarily complicated still worse. It is a deadly defect that this right is available only in case of the listed corporations : the shareholders of unlisted corporations need protection by this right more than those of listed corporations.

會社支配權의 價値와 公正한 新株發行價額

許悳會 건국대학교 1995 대학원 학술논문집 Vol.42 No.-

Reflecting the corporate control, this paper analyzes the control stock. As the stock is continualIy sold to investors, the stock value increases. When a corporation is-sues stock, the stock value simuld be evaluated by the objective valuation of the issuing corpora-tion. Without the objective standard for evaIllating a issuing corporation, it is difficult m calculate the value of control stock. Considering this situation, in-depth researd1 b required for a legal theory of issuance value. The increase of the stock price by majority shareholder's or the third party's purchasing a lot of shares should be analyzed and evaluated for the interest of the minority shareholder without excluding all the speculative value or recongnizing the market value. Considering the value of the corporate control in the United States, as to tender offers, it is a standard for a successful tender offer how much premium should be giver by a offeror to the market value plus investment value.

상법상 물건운송인의 정액배상책임에 관한 이론적 기초

허덕회 충남대학교 법학연구소 2014 法學硏究 Vol.25 No.3

This Article purpose that the possibility of application to §137 in theKorean Commercial Code from the Remoteness and scope of duty principlesof the contract damages on common law in the England. This article searchfor the researching purpose for the sake of the relation between §137 in theCommercial Code with §393 in the Civil Code in the Korea. The reason isthe §137 in the Korean Commercial Code adopted the §430 on theHandelsgesetzbuch of 1897 in the Germany, and §393 in the Civil Codeadopted principles of the Hadley v. Baxendale in the England. The German Commercial Law §430 (1) in whole or partial destruction ofa transportation of goods are based on the same kind of the and propertyare had over by checkpoint in time to pay for it to the destruction of theday of he should compensate for the price of the average transaction pricesor the price when there was no average. (2) In the case of damage to thecheckpoints are not undermined by its purchase price and destination indamaged condition to deliver in case of time and place of normal tradingprice or a normal, shall compensate the margin with price. (3) The loss is a carrier of intentional misconduct or egregious negligence cause in a timewhen the carrier is shall be for all damages. And the costs of checkpoints,immune from the payment of costs or damage caused by othertransportation would be deducted from any amount of compensation. In the Hadley v. Baxendale, Where two parties have made a contractwhich one of them has borken the damages which the other party ought toreceive in respect of such breach of contract as may fairly and reasonablybe considered as either arising naturally, ie, according to the usual courseof things, from such of contract itself, or such as may reasonably besupposed to have been in the contemplation of both parties at the time theymade the contract as the propable result of the breach of it. If specialcircumstances under which the contract was actually made werecommunicated by the plaintiffs to the defendants, and thus known to bothparties, the damages resulting from the breach of such a contract whichthey would reasonably contemplate would be the amount of injury whichordinarily follow from a breach of contract under the special circumstancesso known and the communicated. In this Article interpret that §137 (1), (2) in the Korean CommercialCode same as the normal measure of damages on the §393 (1) in theKorean Civil Code, and intention or gross negligence of the carrier by landtransport on the §137 (3) in the Korean Commercial Code in base of theprinciples of Scope of Duty in the England Common Law deprive of theinterests of adoption in the fixed amount compensation on the §137 (1), (2)of the liability of damage. 본 논문은 운송인의 손해배상에 관한 정액주의를 채택하고 있는상법 제137조의 해석에 관한 이론적 기초를 고찰하는 것을 연구목적으로 한다. 민법 제393조는 손해배상에 관한 일반원칙을 정하고 있고, 이와 별도로 상법은 제137조에서 정액배상을 규정하고 있다. 상법 제137조를 해석함에 있어 민법 제393조와는 단절되는지가 주요쟁점이다. 민법 제393조는 영국법상 Hadley Rule을 계수하여 입법을한 규정이고, 상법 제137조는 독일구상법 제430조를 계수한 규정이다. 독일민법은 손해배상의 일반원칙으로 완전배상주의를 제한하기위한 법리로서 상당인과관계설을 확립하고 있는 반면에, 영국법에서는 Hadley Rule의 완전배상을 제한하기 위한 법리로서 손해의 관련성및 보호범위론을 적용하고 있다는 점에서 다르다. 이러한 법체제의상이에도 불구하고 운송물의 멸실 또는 훼손에 대한 운송인의 배상책임에 간전손해를 포함하지 않는다는 점에서는 동일하다. 이는 운송계약의 특성을 고려하여 계약상의 리스크의 분배를 도모하기 위함으로 평가된다. 그리하여 우리 민법 제393조와 상법 제137조의 연혁에비추어 보았을 때 독일법 및 영국법에서와 같이 상법 제137조를 운송계약상 고유의 리스크를 분배하는 규정으로 해석할 수 있다고 본다. 이 입장에서 상법 제137조는 운송물의 멸실・훼손에 관한 표준적인 리스크분배와 손해액의 산정기준을 정형화하고 있는 규정이라 할수 있다. 본 논문은 상법 제137조를 해석할 때에 민법 제393조의 연혁적인법리에 입각하여 해석할 필요가 있다는 점에 주목한다. 민법 제393조는 계약에 의해 보호되는 이익을 판단하여 손해를 정하는 기준이고,영국에서 운송계약상의 표준적인 리스크분배의 차원에서 운송물에대한 손해배상의 범위를 통상의 손해로 한정하고 있으며, 민법 제393조 제1항은 추상적손해를 정형화하고 있는 규정이라는 점에서 상법 제137조 제1항, 제2항의 해석과 일치한다고 볼 수 있다. 보호범위론의 입장에서 상법 제137조 제1항, 제2항은 민법 제393조 제1항의 일반원칙을 일부 수정하여 구체화 내지 정형화한 규정이라 해석한다. 그리고 상법 제137조 제3항의 운송인의 고의 또는 중대한 과실은 손해배상의 범위에 관한 민법의 일반원칙을 확장하는 사유가 아니라상법 제137조 제1항, 제2항의 책임제한의 이익을 상실하는 사유로 해석한다. 결론적으로 영국법상의 보호범위론은 상법 제137조를 해석하는 데에 적용가능한 유용한 해석기준이 될 수 있다고 본다.

美國會社法上 株主의 重複代表訴訟에 관한 硏究

許悳會 건국대학교 1998 학술논문집 : 건국대 대학원 Vol.46 No.1

The owner of shares in parent corporation may sue on behalf of a subsidiary, giving rise to what has been termed a "double derivative action." This type of derivative action has been allowed against any wrongdoer whom the subsidiary could sue, and to enforce any claim of the subsidiary. Theoretically, this so-called "multiple derivative action" may involve unlimited multiples so long as there is a chain of proprietary interests. Thus, there may be a "triple derivative action" where three corporations are involved. This occurs when a shareholder in one corporation, which in turn owns shares in a third corporation, sues derivatively to enforce a cause of action belonging to the third corporation. Apparently, a multiple derivative action may lie even when the plaintiff-shareholder's corporation does not own a controlling interest in the corporation whose cause of action is the basis for the action. While some cases have inferred that a multiple derivative action is limited to a situation where a71 the corporations involved by the alleged wrongdoer, the modem trend seemingly favors a broader approach. In these articles, Although these actions are not generally in Korea Corporate Law, the point of departure of multiple derivative sues carry through distinction of legal entities in U.S. Corporate Law, Finally I discuss probability of application of multiple derivative suit to Korea Corporate Law.

상호회사의 주식회사로의 조직변경에 관한 연구

허덕회 건국대학교 1991 대학원 학술논문집 Vol.34 No.-

According to the section of the Insurance Law in korea, it is provided that the corporation can transformed it's organization into the mutual companies. Even though it is authorized that the corporation is organizationally transformed into the mutual companies, there is no porvision in the mutual companies to be formed trans into the corporation conversely, The discassion over the possibility of transformation from the mutual corporation to the business corporation has been actively made in both America and Canada, and begun to be discussed by a few Law scholars. With regard to the idelogical problem so far the mutual corporation has been greatly changed in terms of the meaning of its institutional existence, the meaning of the existience of the mutual corporation would he done away with in the near future, or regulation on the mutual corporation can be limited to insurance business. As the remedy to this problem, it is the ideal stand of statutory requlation that the organizational transformation from the mutual corporation to stipulated in the Law. From the awareness of the problem like this, this paper examines the organizational transformation from the mutual corporation to the business corporation only from the aspect of legal technique For this purpose the organizational transformation from the mutual corporation to the business corporation is inquired into in this study centering around the German Law and the New York State Law havint its proviision Another Meaning to pose this porblem in this paper will contribute to reexchainging what legal the staff of the mutual Corporation will Lave, and visualizing the fundmental problem that is not externalized in core that the organizational transformation is achiered it is continued as it is, And the solution here will come to contribute to give us an understanding of the basis structure of the mutual Corporation.

미국회사법에서 이사에 의한 회사관계자의 이해조정

허덕회 한국기업법학회 2004 企業法硏究 Vol.0 No.16