http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 王艳军 ( Wang Yanjun ) (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
中国地方官员的民主价值观为何会有差异? ——对1456个地方官员的问卷分析
肖唐镖 ( Xiao Tangbiao ),王艳军 ( Wang Yanjun ) 성균관대학교 성균중국연구소 2020 중국사회과학논총 Vol.2 No.1
本文从现代化程度、既得利益卷入、职业与政治规训、受教育程度与学习经历、传统权威观念等5个方面描述相关模式,分析其对地方官员民主价值观的影响。研究发现,以地区经济发展为中心的现代化程度、既得利益卷入与传统权威观念均起着消极的反作用,既得利益卷入越深、传统权威观念越重的干部,以及在经济较为发达地区的干部,其民主价值观相对薄弱; 受教育程度越高的地方官员越倾向于支持公民权利,但具有跨国交流与学习经历的地方官员则更倾向于排斥公民权利; 职业与政治规训假设未得到检验,也就是说,现部门性质和党员身份等变量并未对地方官员的民主价值观产生显著影响。 This paper demonstrates a descriptive pattern of local officials’ democratic values upon five factors – the degree of modernization, the involvement of vested interests, professional and political discipline, educational level and learning experience and the traditional-authoritarian ideas. It suggests that the degree of modernization, the involvement of vested interests, and the traditional ideas of authority are negatively correlated with democratic values. The officials who are with deeply involved interests, holding more traditional-authoritarian attitudes, and working in more economically developed areas are less likely to support democratic values. The more educated local officials were, the more likely they were to support civil rights, but the more likely they were to exclude them if they had experience of cross-border communication and learning.While no sufficient evidence supports the hypothetical role of professional and political discipline, in other words, there is no systematic evidence showing that local officials’ democratic values are differing by their department nature and party membership.
KCI
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
