http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 李宗勳(Lee, Jong-Hoon) (검색결과 5 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
李宗勳(Lee, Jong-Hoon) 백산학회 2011 白山學報 Vol.- No.89
한국과 중국의 고구려사에 대한 분쟁은 양국의 학술교류, 정부간 교섭, 각자의 반성 등에 의해 어느 정도 해소되였다고 말할 수 있다. 그러나 고구려사 관련 기본 관점에 대한 양국 학계의 주요 입장 변화는 그다지 크지 않으며 분쟁이 새롭게 일어날 가능성도 없지 않다. 양국은 상당히 많은 관점에서 서로 다르다고 볼수 있으며, 본고에서는 주요 문제상의 관점차이를 중점적으로 비교하고자 한다. 여기에는 고구려의 족속, 정권의 성격, 수당과의 전쟁, 문화의 정체성, 역사귀속, 역사계승 등의 문제를 포함한다. 두 나라의 학계는 계속 상대방 학계의 관점을 더 깊히 파악하고 이해할 필요가 있다. 뿐만 아니라 두 나라의 정부, 학계, 시민단체는 학문의 객관성과 동아시아의 평화를 위하여 동아시아 공동의 역사의식을 높이고 역사학의 평화주의적인 성격을 서로 보완하면서 고구려사 등에 관한 역사분쟁을 근본적으로 해결해 나아가는 길을 모색하기 위한 목적에서 이 글을 작성한다. The disputes with ‘Goguryeo’ history between China and Korea have resolved partially through the academic exchanges, inter-governmental negotiations and respective introspection between two countries. However, thescholars’ standpoints of two countries are still different fundamentally in many points, so there is a possibility of another dispute in the near future. This paper focuses on comparing of these different viewpoints between two countries, which include ‘Goguryeo’ nationality, regime character, the conflicts between the Sui and Tang Dynasties of China, cultural identity, historical belonging and inheritance etc. For the clear academic objectivity and the peace of East Asian, the two countries’scholar groups need to grasp and understand the each other’s viewpoints more in-depth. Furthermore, the governments and civic organizations of two countries are required to realize again the importance of peaceful nature of the history and improve the common historical consciousness of East Asia. This paper aims to find the fundamental solutions to the potential disputes regarding ‘Goguryeo’ history.
-
李宗勳(Lee, Jong-Hoon) 백산학회 2003 白山學報 Vol.- No.67
As Lia-Tung areas in ancient age had lived many nations and tribos, the Characteristic of that place did not explain a single concept Therefore, we cannot describe her culture as seen by modern national identity. But Bohai was a dynasty by the core factors of Malgals with the koguryo’s supports. Bohai was muti-nation dynasty, so that her history and culture could not compare with other ancient countries. This is the reason that Bohai’s stadies were very delicate and complicated in views of one side opproach. In conclusion, bohai(Balhae) had dual characteristics with Koguryo and Malgal. But these double-faced culture of this dynasty had much difficulties in studies. On the other hand, Bohai used the dual-national name by Koguryo and self country.
-
李宗勳(Lee, Jong-Hoon),馮立君 백산학회 2009 白山學報 Vol.- No.83
This paper discusses these questions: the historical background and the process of the Competition between Koguryo and Murong Xianbei from the last of the 3th century to the beginning of the 5th century, the evolution of the balance of the two powers in the process, the cognition of Koguryo occupying Liaodong region. First, introduce the changes in the situation in East Asia and the rise of Murong Xianbei and Koguryo. From the last of the 3th century to the beginning of the 5th century, Western Jin Dynasty empire forces gradually withdrew from most regions north of the Changjiang River, so all ethnic groups in northern China competed in the long-term chaos rule the roost, but the south of China unified by Eastern Jin Dynasty empire. Murong Xianbei and Koguryo bounded roughly by the Liao River,Side-by-side on the north of East Asian mainland. Murong Xianbei had ruled the Liao River area and the middle and lower reaches of Yellow River regions. In the 4th century, Koguryo who occupied Hunjiang River and Yalu Riverregions started to expand to the Datong River region. For Murong Xianbei and Koguryo, Liaodong region in economic development, military and strategic aspects had great significance. Second, according to the Chinese and Korean ancient literature, I sort out a historical process of the Competition between Murong Xianbei and Koguryo, Put focus on Liaodong issue between Murong Xianbei and Koguryo's balance of power changes in a three-stage process. Stage 1 was two ethnic groups in the overall balance of power. Stage 2, Murong Xianbei increased significantly in strength, weakened the strength of Koguryo, Koguryo was forced to concede defeat. Stage 3, after recovery period Koguryo took advantage of potential failure of Murong Xianbei, eventually won the Liaodong region and made western boundaries of the expansion reached its peak. Third, contrary to generally positive assessment of Koguryo occupying Liaodong region, I agree that occupying Liaodong was a very favorable conditions of Koguryo, but at this premise, I emphasized that occupying Liaodong was not conducive to the Koguryo national defense. There are two reasons for that, one is that the China Empire attacked Koguryo in the 6th and 7th century, the other is that Koguryo occupied Liaodong region and Set up a lot of military fortress in Liaodong contained its Southward advance policy. The both reasons were proposed based on real military and diplomatic evidences.
-
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
