http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
박수근 한국노동법학회 2010 노동법학 Vol.0 No.35
회사가 일부 근로자들에 대하여 전직명령 사유로 삼은 ‘근무부적응’은 다의적, 포괄적 개념으로 그 자체로 전직대상자 선별을 정당화할만한 객관적 평가기준으로 채용하기 어려운 한계가 있다. 근무 부적응 평가의 근거로 제출된 자료들은 소속부서장의 주관적이고 추상적인 평가에 기초한 것이어서 전직대상자 선별을 정당화할 근거로 사용될 수 없어, 근로자에 대한 전직명령은 자의적인 인사권의 남용으로서 무효이므로, 발령지로 출근하지 않은 것을 무근결근으로 볼 수 없다.
파견법상 직접고용에서 쟁점과 해석 - 현대차사건의 판결을 중심으로 -
박수근 노동법이론실무학회 2015 노동법포럼 Vol.- No.15
This article aims to review legal issues connected with legal effects of unlawful dispatch employment in Dispatched Workers Act. It is mainly composed of three parts in a view of contents. The first part is to confirm a claim for direct employment in Dispatched Workers Act. if a using employer uses the dispatched worker period of more than two years, the dispatched worker shall be regarded as employed by the using employer. but, amended by Act Dec. 21. 2006, if a using employer falls any of the following article 6-2(Obligation of Employment), he shall directly employ the dispatched worker. it is necessary to analyze difference and legal effects in an old-new regulations. The second part is to treat working conditions about direct employment of dispatched worker. by new regulations, if a using employer directly employs a dispatched worker, working conditions for the dispatched worker shall be applicable to the working conditions prescribed in employment rules in a worker performing the same or similar kind of work. The third part is to review the first trial about the case of Hyundai Motor Company issued an appeal by many dispatched workers. this case has a burning issue between dispatched worker and using employer in application of Dispatched Workers Act.