http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 太田修(Osamu Ota) (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
太田修(Osamu Ota) 고려대학교 한국사연구소 2000 International Journal of Korean History Vol.1 No.-
The central focus of diplomatic policies towards Japan during the Chang My?n regime was the 'Korean-Japanese Economic Alliance.' This alliance, based on the adopted platform of "economy first" (ky? ngje cheil chu?i), might also be said to have been a reason for the regime's downfall. Immediately after the April Revolution (April 19, 1960) that overthrew the Syngman Rhee government, the Chang My?n regime promulgated "economy first" in response to popular demands for self-sustained economic growth and state demands to consolidate government land for commercializing the economy ahead of North Korea. Thus, the economic alliance was a campaign with strong democratic overtones. In the national assembly, the first to handle issues of Korean-Japanese relations, the minority party fiercely criticized the government's 'Korean-Japanese Economic Alliance' as a form of collaborative pro-Japanese diplomacy. In the economic sphere, the Korea Economic Association (Hanguk ky?ngje hy?p ?ihoe) showed positive support of it while the Korea Foreign Trade Association (Muy?k hy?bhoe) and the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Taehan sanggong hoe?lso) were unsupportive. In discussion forums the Tonga Ilbo gave its support while the Chas?n Ilbo took a stance as critical as the minority party on this issue. Chang My?n regime's 'Korean-Japanese Economic Alliance' thus did not receive unanimous support domestically. Amidst all this, the Japanese, focusing on this economic alliance suggested by the Chang My?n regime, unofficially proposed a strategy to settle the question of Japanese restitutions for colonizing Korea through economic collaboration between the two countries, and as a result of the disputes over legislation and evidence in the fifth Korean-Japanese talks, the Koreans considered abandoning restitution demands. The Chang My?n regime initially did not have any intention of accepting 'economic collaboration' as a substitute for restitution. However, in the process of conducting debates on economic alliance, the regime began to pursue a course that made it impossible to avoid economic collaboration. Furthermore, in the fifth conference, Japan demanded that they present legal evidence and basis for Korea's restitution demands, putting them in a position where they could only but agree to 'political compromise.' Therefore, the 5th conference put both parties on a road to compromise on the restitution issue, settled through economic collaboration, and although the Chang My?n regime's economic alliance theory never intended to be used to resolve the restitution debate, ultimately it became a catalyst in facilitating the adoption of economic collaboration.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
