http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이신화(Lee, Shinwha) 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소 2013 亞細亞硏究 Vol.56 No.2
International peacekeeping operations consist of UN-led PKO(UNPKOs) and non-UN-led ones. UNPKOs are directly deployed and financed by the United Nations with the approval of the Security Council, while non-UN PKOs, also known as multinational peacekeeping force(MNF), are international military groups constituting forces from different countries. The latter also requires the Security Council’s consent, but their activities are financially and administratively sponsored by participating countries, usually with a lead nation. As MNF operations are often claimed to be more effective and successful than UN-led PKOs, western (and powerful) countries, which have operational and financial resources with strong combat capabilities, tend to prefer it over UNPKOs. In the case of Korea, however, there has been a gap, what I call “PKO divide,” where the public, policy makers and national assemblymen have had little objection to dispatching UNPKO forces whereas showing strong reservation or resistance when sending MNF, especially when the U.S. has made a request. As a consequence, the law on UNPKO participation was passed at the National Assembly in 2009, but this law is not applicable to the cases of MNF dispatchment. Against this backdrop, this paper examines the changing development of international peacekeeping activities and evaluates the role of Korean PKOs, both UN-led and non-UN-led. Then the paper discusses why the PKO divide occurs in Korea and seeks institutional and legal solutions to reduce the gap.