http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : ( Leon De Haas ) (검색결과 7 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Socrates in the 21st century-A Justification of Skeptical Interventions in Narrative Encounters -
( Leon De Haas ) 한국철학상담치료학회 2018 철학 실천과 상담 Vol.8 No.-
In this essay, which is a summary of the main ideas in the author’s Ph.D. research (still work in progress), the author proposes a method to justify philosophical practice philosophically. Such a justification is necessary for the sake of the connection with academic philosophy and to avoid philosophical bungling. The author connects to Socrates’ skeptical and maieutic legacy, as well as to Husserl’s perceptive/experiential and Wittgenstein’s descriptive and ordinary language legacies. He explains his hypothesis that a philosopher might be aware of his epistemic premises and able to test these premises in the practice of philosophizing. He discusses his methodic and epistemic hypotheses, the latter being experiential and semantic questioning.
-
-
Situational Philosophy : Towards a theory of philosophical practice
( Leon De Haas ) 한국철학상담치료학회 2012 철학 실천과 상담 Vol.3 No.-
This essay is a revised and expanded version of the text which was the basis for the author’s Masterclass at the 11th International Conference on Philosophical Practice (ICPP), the 18th of July 2012 at the Humanities Institute, Kangwon National University in Chuncheon, Republic of Korea. The main goal of the essay is, to contribute to a theory of philosophical practice. To do this, the author develops a criticism of reductionist practices in philosophy. The theoretical point of departure is an abridged survey of the two paradigmatic changes in European philosophy in the 20th century, i.e., Husserl’s phenomenology, and Wittgenstein’s language game analysis. The line of thinking is illustrated by a case story of the author. Part I discusses the phenomenological and linguistic turns in European philosophy. Part II describes and discusses a case story. Part III criticizes two forms of reductionism in philosophical practice, namely psychological and conceptual reductionism. Part IV gives an initial impetus to a theory of philosophical practice beyond any reductionism. In the present essay, the author is dealing with Western philosophy only, as the origins of post-Modern philosophical practice are rooted in Western philosophy. Lately, Eastern philosophy has been an inspiration for philosophical practice as well.
-
Leon de Haas 강원대학교 인문과학연구소 2018 Journal of Humanities Therapy Vol.9 No.1
Lydia Amir calls on philosophers to take responsibility in society by offering rational alternatives to irrational New Age cosmology in spiritual matters and to amateurish psychological answers in moral issues. She offers a skeptical worldview, in which humor plays the key role. This essay discusses her worldview critically. Her view of epistemology is limited, like her view of skepticism. In both cases, the Socratic practice of skeptical investigation of truth claims in dialogical encounters is ignored. Her project is seen as one of the contemporary attempts to restore philosopher’s lost key role in society.
-
Encounters and Dialogues: Styles and Levels of Communication in Philosophical Practice
Leon de Haas 강원대학교 인문과학연구소 2011 Journal of Humanities Therapy Vol.2 No.-
The world of philosophical practice is a patchwork of partly vague, partly not reducible styles and methods. We badly lack a common language regarding the quality of philosophical practice. The author contributes to the professional discussion of philosophical practice by being explicit about his approach. He characterizes his phenomenologically inspired way of philosophical practice as ‘dialogical encounter’. He describes some examples from his coaching practice. In the last part of the essay, he makes a distinction between encountering and procedural practices by describing two events.
-
A Skeptic’s Look on Philosophical Therapy
Leon de Haas 강원대학교 인문과학연구소 2015 Journal of Humanities Therapy Vol.6 No.1
Philosophical practice is a historical and social phenomenon. As such it reflects and reproduces developments in the society which it is part of. In Western countries the post-industrial mass culture of the Self can be seen as a struggle with ‘nihilism’. Attempts to proclaim a philosophical therapy are both part of the culture of the Self, and, particularly, a sign of resistance against the loss of philosophical identity. In the context of the Industrial Revolution philosophy lost substantial crafts to the new sciences and humanities. In different ways, Husserl and Wittgenstein gave due consideration to that loss, and developed new practices of philosophy. Their paradigmatic innovations are known as the linguistic and phenomenological turns, the latter radicalized by Levinas. In this essay, the work of the three protagonists is called the ‘Open Senses’ paradigm. After World War II this paradigmatic revolution has been ignored, or at least debunked. Peter Raabe’s book on philosophical therapy is discussed as a present-day example of restorative philosophy in the field of philosophical practice.
-
사례 없는 철학자: -대화-내러티브 철학에 있어서 방법과 사례-
레옹드하스 ( Leon De Haas ) 한국철학상담치료학회 2016 철학 실천과 상담 Vol.6 No.-
철학실천에 관한 논의 중 가장 중요한 이슈는 방법을 사용하는 것이 적합한가 하는 문제이다. 학실천의 사례를 기술하는 것이 가능한가 혹은 바람직한가 하는 문제는 방법론 논의와 관련된다. 이 두 문제 모두에 있어 전문 철학적 논의는 도덕적 논의와 섞여있고 심지어 비도덕적 행위를 비난하는 것과도 관련된다. 어떤 점에서는 거기에 바벨탑과 같은 혼동 또한 있다. 방법론 지지자들은 그것을 도덕적 목적이나 의도가 없는 수단, 시스템, 구조의 관점에서 생각한다. 반면 그 반대자들은 방법을 비인간적 행위는 아니더라도 비도덕적인 행위의 수단으로 여긴다. 방법을 사용한다는 것은 실천에 있어 내담자에 대한 (인지적) 폭력으로 여겨진다. 그것이 바로 철학실천에 있어 방법의 사용을 거부하는 이유이다. 이런 논리는 결의론에 관한 논의로 전환된다. 지지자들은 철학실천에 있어 상호주관적으로 통제할 수 있는 수월성을 추구하기 위해서는 사례에 대한 기술이 필요하다고 주장한다. 반대자들은 사례 기술이 사고를 도구적으로 사용함으로써 철학적 수월성을 근본적으로 해친다고 말한다. 논자는 이 논쟁의 현장에서 벗어나고자 한다. 방법으로서의 근대철학의 전통, 그중에서도 특히 현상학적·언어적 전환을 가지고 참여한다. 자신의 철학실천 사례의 경험과 관찰을 언급하면서 논자는 대화에 있어 철학실천가의 ‘능동-수동적’ 참여를, 내담자에 대해 어떤 길과 목적을 정하지 않은 채 실천가가 대화에 나타나고 참여하는데 집중하는 방법으로 설명한다. 논자는 어떤 ‘학문적’ 기법의 특징을 설명함으로써 실천가가 내러티브 대화에 나타나고 활동하는 것을 명확하게 만든다. 그래서 철학을 내러티브 대화로 그리는 것이 독자에게 전해지는 것이다.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
