RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • SCOPUSKCI등재

        On the Feasibility of Economic Cooperation in East Asia: Perspectives from Trade Creation and Trade Diversion

        ( Deng Shing Huang ),( Jenn Hwa Tu ) 세종대학교 경제통합연구소 1994 Journal of Economic Integration Vol.9 No.3

        This paper attempts to measure the feasibility of economic cooperation in East Asia from an economic point of view. To approach this issue, we decompose the effect of economic cooperation into trade creation (TC) and trade diversion (TD) by using the well-known revealed comparative advantage (RCA) index. Diversity in the RCA indices among member countries should be closely related to the magnitude of TC. On the other hand, TD occurs in the case of a union in goods in which the outside region as a whole has a comparative advantage. In addition, members who suffer from TD will be those that have a low RCA index and thus have to import. The results show that the export structures differ quite significantly between ASEAN and the NICs. Based on the RCA index, we would expect an intraregional trade creation effect in the case of commodity groups 1 (agriculture), 2 (mining), 31 (food, beverages and tobacco), 32 (textiles), 33 (wood & products) and 39 (other manufactures) if ASEAN and the NICs form a union. Since Japan has a revealed comparative advantage in commodity groups 37 (basic metals) and 38 (metal manufactures), excluding it from the union would induce TD in these goods and the importing member countries will thus suffer. Therefore, if Japan is included into the union, trade diversion in the case of goods 37 and 38 disappears, and trade creation follows. However, for goods 31 (food, beverages and tobacco), 34 (Paper and products), and 35 (chemicals), in which these ten countries, as a whole, have a comparative disadvantage compared with the rest of the world, TD is inevitable. Again, countries that have to import or have a comparative disadvantage in these goods will suffer from trade diversion.

      • SCOPUSKCI등재

        On the Feasibility of Economic Cooperation in East Asia : Perspectives from Trade Creation and Trade Diversion

        Huang, Deng-Shing,Tu, Jenn-Hwa 세종대학교 국제경제연구소 1994 Journal of Economic Integration Vol.9 No.3

        This paper attempts to measure the feasibility of economic cooperation in East Asia from an economic point of view. To approach this issue, we decompose the effect of economic cooperation into trade creation (TC) and trade diversion (TD) by using the well-known revealed comparative advantage (RCA) index. Diversity in the RCA indices among member countries should be closely related to the magnitude of TC. On the other hand, TD occurs in the case of a union in goods in which the outside region as a whole has a comparative advantage. In addition, members who suffer from TD will be those that have a low RCA index and thus have to import. The results show that the export structures differ quite significantly between ASEAN and the NICs. Based on the RCA index, we would expect an intraregional trade creation effect in the case of commodity groups 1 (agriculture), 2 (mining), 31 (food, beverages and tobacco), 32 (textiles), 33 (wood & products) and 39 (other manufactures) if ASEAN and the NICs form a union. Since Japan has a revealed comparative advantage in commodity groups 37 (basic metals) and 38 (metal manufactures), excluding it from the union would induce TD in these goods and the importing member countries will thus suffer. Therefore, if Japan is included into the union, trade diversion in the case of goods 37 and 38 disappears, and trade creation follows. However, for goods 31 (food, beverages and tobacco), 34 (paper and products), and 35 (chemicals), in which these ten countries, as a whole, have a comparative disadvantage compared with the rest of the world, TD is inevitable. Again, countries that have to import or have a comparative disadvantage in these goods will suffer from trade diversion.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼