http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
자궁내막암 수술적 병기설정 과정에서 림프절 절제술의 역할
유희석,장준석 대한부인종양학회 2006 Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Vol.17 No.2
A review of the role of lymph nodes dissection for patients with endometrial cancer was performed. The prognostic value of node status for endometrial cancer patients has been recognized, and lymph nodes dissection performed by experienced surgeons has acceptable morbidity. Multiple series have suggested that significantly less external beam radiation is given to patients with known negative nodes. In 1988 FIGO established the surgical staging system for endometrial cancer, ever since the decreased use of postoperative whole pelvic radiation has potential cost savings. However a survival advantage for lymph nodes dissection has not yet been proven in a randomized clinical trial. The interim result of ASTEC study showed that there is no survival advantage for endometrial cancer patients who undergo lymph nodes dissection. Although the morbidity, potential cost savings, and prognostic impact of node status are well accepted, it remains controversial as to whether lymph nodes dissection provides a survival advantage.
유희석 대한의사협회 2010 대한의사협회지 Vol.53 No.3
The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) updated the staging system for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium in 2009. A new staging system for uterine sarcoma has been designed. This review summarizes the changes. There were minor changes in carcinoma of endometrium and cervix. The staging systems for uterine sarcomas were newly developed. Major changes were made for the carcinoma of vulva. There were no changes for cancer of the ovary, tube, vagina, and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
하이데거와 과학기술: “과학은 사유하지 않는다”라는 단언을 중심으로
유희석 한국하이데거학회 2023 현대유럽철학연구 Vol.- No.71
Martin Heidegger's notorious dictum, "Die Wissenschaft denkt nicht," compels both philosophers and scientists to confront a provoking question: Is science truly incapable of thought? If so, what defines this so-called omnipotent science? Against the grain of the prevailing scientistic culture, Heidegger embraces "die Erörterung" as a philosophical vocation, elucidating the scholarly raison d'être of various branches of learning and situating them in their proper places. For him, engaging in philosophy as Ur-wissenschaft cannot be merely a discursive practice but a compelling task. Consequently, science and technology logically fall under the purview of the study of Ur-wissenschaft, which assigns them their rightful positions. However, the actual situation in contemporary universities worldwide is quite the opposite. Far from situating science and technology appropriately, philosophy, as an academic discipline, often finds itself subservient to them. When every philosophical thought today is relentlessly influenced by scientific ways of thinking, one must ask a critical question about philosophy, which has comfortably ensconced itself in the university. This paper, titled "Heidegger and Science/Technology," poses such a question by pondering on Heidegger's assertion, "Die Wissenschaft denkt nicht," and comparing it with Kuhn's concept of Scientific Revolution. In doing so, it argues for ‘the Ur-wissenshaftliche role’ of philosophy in the modern world.