RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 韓·露關係 : 1880年代부터 1910年代까지를 중심으로 1880~1910

        辛承權 단국대학교 미소연구소 1987 미소연구 Vol.1 No.-

        The Russian Policy toward korea has never been explained in detail. The traditional interpretation is that Korea had always great importance for Tsarist Russia. My contention is that Korea itself was insignificant for Russia. It was only due to the Russian need for passage through the Korean Strait that it would not allow any other power to occupy Korea. Apart from Sergei Witte’s designs on Korea in 1897, Russian policy toward Korea was less attentive than the historians claim. My finding is that it was rather Korea which turned to Russia for protection in the 1880’s and later in order to maintain its independence from the Chinese and Japanese imperialism. Not for a moment am I implying that the Tsarist Russian policy in East Asia was peace-loving. The Russian policy toward China was aggressive. But its policy toward Korea was determined by its much greater China interest: Russia did not attempt to seize Korea in the 1880’s because it did not wish to jeopardize its relations with China. In he 1890’s and early 20th century Russia could not seize Korea because this would have provoked war with Japan. In other words, for Russia Korea was not worth fighting a war with either China or Japan. Another important thing to bear in mind is that the so-called Russian a ggression against Korea was justified on the grounds that Russia longed for an ice-free port such as Port Lazaref near Wonsan. But there was no Russian version of Seikan Ron(conquer Korea argument). The Russian policy toward Korea from the 1870’s to 1910 was a series of inconsistent sto gap measures and was not strictly speaking a policy at all.

      • 韓國戰爭의 기원

        신승권 한양대학교 사회과학대학 1997 社會科學論叢 Vol.16 No.-

        Historically the Korean peninsula has been a battleground between china, Russia, and Japan, each of which considered Korea vital to its security. At the end of Second World War Korea once again became the buffer zone for China, the Soviet Union, and the United States. During the war the Russians kept complete silence as to their aspiration in Korea, although they have agreed to establishing a four-power trusteeship. The Russians have formulated for occupation of the entire Korean peninsula, but they agreed to partition Korea along the 38th parallel in order to avoid a direct confrontation with the United States. Once partition had become an accomplished fact, the Soviet goal was to solidify their control over north Korea and to block any attempt to implement the four-power trusteeship. At the meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers in Moscow in December 1945, Stalin had plans to communise the entire Korean peninsula, but he kept silence about it. The Moscow trusteeship agreement was to oust all foreign enfluences and establish a Korean provisional government which is composed of left wing representatives and "friendly" to the Soviet Union. By the end of 1948 it became clear that the Soviet and American troops would be withdrawn from the Korean peninsula. In early 1949 Joseph Stalin began to prepare for the Korean War. Stalin's goals in the Korean War were the domination of all of the Korean peninsula in order to strengthen Soviet power and influence in the Far East. In his Memoirs, Nikita Khrushchev said that the Korean War was not initiated by Stalin but by Kim Il-sung. Since Stalin distructed Mao Tae-tung, scholars gave assumed that he did not consult the Chinese leader during the Sino-Soviet summit meeting in December 1949. However, recently released Kremlin documents by Dmitrii Volkogonov make clear that Stalin consulted Mao in Moscow in his Korean War strategy. From the beginning Stalin asked Kim Il-sung to approach Communist China concerning the war.

      • 스탈린과 韓國戰爭

        辛承權 한양대학교 사회과학대학 1993 社會科學論叢 Vol.12 No.-

        Historically the Korean peninsula has been a battleground between China, Russia, and Japan, each of which considered Korea vital to its security. At the end of the Second World War Korea once again became the buffer zone for China, the Soviet Union, and the United States. During the war the Russians kept complete silences as to their aspirations in Korea, although they have agreed to establishing a four-power trusteeship. The Russians have formulated for occupation of the entire Korean peninsula, but they agreed to partition Korea along the 38th parallel in order to avoid a direct confrontation with the United States. Once partition had become an accomplished fact, the Soviet goal was to solidify their control over north Korea and to block any attempt to implement the four-power trusteeship. At the meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers in Moscow in December 1945, Stalin had plans to communise the entire Korean peninsula, but he kept silence about it. The Moscow trusteeship agreement was to oust all foreign influences and establish a Korean provisional government which is composed of left wing representatives and "friendly" to the Soviet Union. By the end of 1948 it became clear that the Soviet and American troops would be withdrawn from the Korean peninsula. In early 1949 Joseph Stalin began to prepare for the Korean War. Stalin's goals in the Korean War were the domination of all of the Korean peninsula in order to strengthen Soviet power and influence in the Far East. In his Memories, Nikita Khrushchev said that the Korean War was not initiated by Stalin but by Kim Il-sung. Since Stalin distructed Mao Tse-tung, scholars have assumed that he did not consult the Chinese leader during the Sino-Soviet summit meeting in December 1949. However, recently released Kremlin documents by Dmitrii Volkogonov make clear that Stalin consulted Mao in Moscow in his Korean War strategy. From the beginning Stalin asked Kim Il-sung to approach Communist China concerning the war. Stalin's strategy was to weaken China through protracted military conflict which would confined to the Korean peninsula and the Chinese mainland. Stalin predicted that China would participate in the Korean War. Stalin's aim was to weaken China and make the Mao regime even more dependent on the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union's boycott of the UN Security Council from January 1950 until after the Korean War began was Stalin's strategy. The Russians calculated to first boycott the council on the pretext of pressing for recognition of communist China, while knowing that United States would intervene in the war and the Chinese would send in troops. Stalin tried to camouflage the Korean War as a war for national liberation. However, from the beginning the United States considered the war was started by the Soviet Union. In July 1951 Stalin was confronted with most critical situation. The Truman government was considering using atomic boms against the Chinese troops in Korea. Statlin had no choice except to terminate the Korean conflict. After Statlin's death, in July 1953, China ended the Korean War.

      • AHCISCOPUSKCI등재
      • AHCISCOPUSKCI등재
      • AHCISCOPUSKCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼