대학교양 국민윤리 교과운영 실태

이준구,양흥모 한국국민윤리학회 1988 倫理硏究 Vol.26 No.1

分配理論 서베이 : 基一 : 分配적 正義의 探索

李俊求 서울大學校 經濟硏究所 1988 經濟論集 Vol.27 No.2

Ⅰ. 머리말 Ⅱ. 傳統的인 諸思潮 Ⅲ. 롤즈의 分配的 正義觀 Ⅳ. 哲學과 經濟學 Ⅴ. 맺음말

大學新聞의 役割에 關한 一硏究

李俊球 弘益大學校 1975 弘大論叢 Vol.7 No.-

College newspaper is quite naturally distinguished form general newspaper, since the goal of college newspaper is to better the reciprocal communication in the college society. College newspaper should speak for the interests or concerns common to the college compoments-professors, students and academic authorities and also its mission should be consistent with the proper functcon of college soiety. Therefore, to reasonably establish the position of college newspaper, we have to clarify the characteristics of college newspaper prior to touching the other matters. College newspaper is not only for professors, nor only for students. nor the more only for the academic authorities. As indicated in the above, college newspaper belongs to the whole people of college. Accordingly, in the light of its character, college newspaper should live together with college and find its ground in the duties college performs. In other words, the most vital function of college newspaper is no other than to strenuously back up college so that all the duties of college might be implemented more smoothly relative to education, research, student's movement and social services. It is quite true that college newspaper originally presented itself before students with an appearance of organizational paper for the academic authorities. However, it is also real that students have transformed college newspaper into the paper only for them as if they would have obtained the exclusive right to compile from the academic authorities. In a word, all the possible misfortunes have been derived from these two facts. Firstly, students have disregarded the college newspaper of academic authorities and that of student's exclusive compilation has become alien from academic authorities and professors. In this manner, college newspaper had to come in its thorny and winding road. Differently from the adverse period of general newspaper, this thorny road, however, is due to the fact that college newspaper has struggled to traverse the boundary of college society. Furthermore, the struggle has turned out to be the fallacy that college newspaper tries to be in line with social newspapers beyond college society that is a peculiar world of intellectual development. Repeatedly to say, students in part have the notion that college newspaper also should keep the attitude to report objectively and to comment critically on all the affairs occurring in the college society. But this notion has a grave defect owing to its subjective prejudice to see college newspaper identical with social newspapers College society has no need of sensational and shocking news unlike general society. The reason is that the reporting eye of social newspaer concentrates its focus on the greatest concernss of the largest multitude while that of college society sticks to the specialities which college is most concerned about and expects to occur in the unique society named college. Here we feel is worth while to review the functions of social newspaers: 1. self-conservation 2. report 3. instruction 4. recreation What relation could the above functions of social newspaper have with those of college newspaper? First, the function of self-conservation is not necessary to college newpaper, for college newspaper may well only get along with publicity regardless of merchandisability. Second, despite of the similar function of report both college and social newspapers perform, college newspaper cannot but pay attention to the concerns peculiar to college rather the greatest interests of the largest multitude. Third, as for the function of instruction, college newspaer should display it sufficiently through the editional, essay, column and the voices of readers(students). Fourth, by the recreational function college newspaper does not have to manage to attract more readers and to flatter them with a view to maintain itself. In brief, college newspaper should be strictly distinguished from the social ones by consolidating the posture of high dignity. College newspaper is not regarded only journalism as general newspaper is. College newspaper takes an important role of creating college culture by the way of coordination of journalism and academism, and at the same time, as the public utilities of college society and instrument of college education, it should be a front runner actualizing the college spirit. Nevertheless, some college newspaper shows the image of prossor's essay in general magazines and college newapaper itself seems to be essay paper. Next, strictly speaking, not a few of student's literary works on college newspaper seem to be in the same level of high school and the news also cannot surpass notice boards in campus. Beside, there's nothing worthy to be transferred into social newspaper. This is the big problem, intellectual poverty of college newspaper. In addition, our college newspaper try to expose the peculiarity of college so exceedingly that we often becoming far apart from the realization of ideal. College shall, by all means, see the whole notwithstanding its location in the specific territory, and what college shall pursue is to conquer the whole adversity and tribulation that we, all mankind encounter today and tomorrows, although college consist of a small part of people. College cannot live by itself. Open the windows of college, all the windows toward other college, general society and the world. College newspaper will perform its great task to look out of college and look into college from outside through these windows. With this role college newspaper shall strive to report emphasizing the deep and specialized, differently from social newspaper which reports the facts covering diversified and extensive fields on the viewpoint of objectivity.

個人과 社會와의 關係에 對한 一硏究 : Georg Simmel의 相互作用을 中心으로

李俊球 弘益大學校 1976 弘大論叢 Vol.8 No.-

韓·日 雨國의 近代化와 敎育 : A Special Study in Terms of Comparative Educational History 比較敎育史的 考察을 中心으로

李俊球 弘益大學校 1985 弘大論叢 Vol.17 No.1

This article is concerned with a comparative study on the modernization and educational renovation of Korea and Japan between the later part of century and 1910. Specifically, the writer tries to make a concrete research on why Korea was destined to be colonized as a result of the failure of its modernization while Japan could rise to the first advanced country in Asia after its Maiji Rehabilitation. In Chapter Ⅰ, the writer compares their modernization and educational renovation on the basis of the writer's conviction that a comparative study of such matters of the two countries is significant and worthy. In Chapter Ⅱ, the writer delves into what were the fundamental problems in the mdernization and education of Korea, diligentry referring to the data obtained in the preceding chapter.

韓國近代의 留學과 民族主義 : with Referance to the Refration and Frustration of Their Movement 民族意識의 屈折과 展開

李俊球 弘益大學校 1990 弘大論叢 Vol.22 No.1

The Korean education as the leading factor of historical innovation and consciousness formation during the later 19th century was expected to to play a double role: encouragement of national consciousness and counter power to the rapid international surge. In the context of the contemporary national danger, the Korean students' national consciousness was relatively strong. However, it is noteworthy that their consciousness was gradually refracted and became eventually subject to the change of direction influenced by the outside world trend. Their change of direction is well illustrated by the fact that instead of pursuing their national consciousness movement, they turned toward the movement of independance and national salvation.

Global Value Chains and the Digital and Green Transition

이준구 비판사회학회 2022 비판사회학회 학술대회 자료집 Vol.2022 No.11

우리 나라 租稅制度의 所得再分配 效果

李常英,李俊求 서울大學校經濟硏究所 1996 經濟論集 Vol.35 No.2

우리 나라 조세제도의 부담분배에 관한 최근의 연구는 조세부담의 누진성이 점차 강화되는 방향으로 변화되고 있다는 분석결과를 제시하여 우리의 관심을 끌고 있다. 본 논문은 이와 같은 연구결과가 과연 현실을 정확하게 반영하고 있는지 다시 한번 그 결론의 타당성을 검증할 필요가 있다는 데서 그 출발점을 찾고 있다. 기존 연구가 갖는 방법론상의 문제점을 보완하고 새로운 시각에서 우리 나라의 조세제도가 부담분배의 측면에서 갖고 있는 성격을 분석하려는 것이 이 논문의 주안점이다. 본 연구는 대우경제 연구소에서 수집한 『1993년도 한국가구 패널조사』의 통계자료를 분석의 기초로 삼는다는 점에서 기존의 연구와 차이를 갖고 있다. 이 자료는 전국가구를 모집단으로 하여 표본조사한 미시자료라는 점에서 기존의 연구가 기초하고 있는 자료들에 비해 상대적인 장점을 갖고 있다. 또한 본연구는 탈세가 이루어지고 있는 사실을 명백히 고려에 넣었다는 점에서도 기존의 연구와 큰 차이를 보인다. 우리 사회에서 탈세가 광범하게 이루어지고 있는 것이 사실인데도 기존의 연구들은 이를 전혀 고려에 넣지 않았고, 그 결과 우리 나라 조세제도가 갖는 부담분배의 누진성을 과장해서 평가하게 되었다. 본 연구는 실제의 부담분배가 기존의 연구에서 밝혀진 것보다 훨씬 더 역진적이라는 분석결과를 제시하고 있다.

신자유주의적 개혁의 이상과 현실

이준구 서울大學校經濟硏究所 2011 經濟論集 Vol.50 No.3

It is very difficult to see an example of country which has been remarkably successful in the task of reforming the public sectior. A variety of ways to reform the public sector have been tried, but no one has proved to be a magic bullet. Recently, a new move which tries to reform the public sector by providing performance-based incentives has been in fashion. Supporters of the policies utilizing performance-based incentives argue that we can make bureauctrats work harder voluntarily by subjecting them to powerful incentives. One good example of such policies is performance-based accountability systems which has been the main backbone of educational reform in the United States. Many states had been experimenting with this neo-liberal reform agenda since the 1980s, and the federal government introduced a very similar system by enacting No Child Left Behind Act. However, the introduction of performance-based accountability system has failed to revolutionize the American education. Critics point out that such a system creates incentives to raise test scores per se, not to improve student learning. It has been observed that teachers and administrators use various kinds of methods to raise test scores. They are observed even to cheat in order to raise students' test scores. In view of this somewhat disappointing results of performanced-based accountability system, we can conclude that neo-librarl reform could not be a good medicine for the chronic ills of the public sector. 세계 여러 나라에서 공공부문의 효율성을 획기적으로 높이기 위한 개혁 프로그램의 실험이 활발하게 이루어지고 있다. 최근 들어 성과에 기초한 유인을 제공하는 신자유주의적 개혁방식이 많은 관심을 끌고 있다. 미국 주정부 차원에서 시작된 성과에 기초한 책임 정책, 그리고 이것의 연장선상에서 연방정부가 도입한 NCLB 정책은 이 신자유주의적 개혁 노력의 대표적 사례라고 할 수 있다. 이 교육개혁 프로그램이 미국 교육에 어떤 영향을 미쳤는지를 심도 있게 분석해 보면 과연 신자유주의적 개혁이 공공부문의 대대적 혁신을 가져올 수 있는지에 대한 분명한 답을 얻을 수 있다. 한 마디로 말해 강력한 유인을 제공해 교육개혁을 이루려는 시도는 약속된 결과를 가져다주는 데 실패했다. 성과 평과의 기초가 되는 시험의 성적은 향상된 것으로 나타났지만, 그것이 진정한 의미에서의 교육의 질 향상을 뜻하는 것은 아니었다. 성적의 향상은 성적 그 자체를 올리려는 학교와 교사의 노력이 가져온 결과라는 해석이 설득력을 얻고 있다. 그 과정에서 오히려 교육의 내용이 왜곡되는 부작용만 가져왔다고 볼 수 있다. 신자유주의적 방식에 의한 교육개혁 시도가 가져온 가장 비극적인 결과는 가장 깨끗해야할 교육부문에서 부정행위가 횡행하게 되었다는 점이다. 학생들의 부정행위를 적발해 엄격하게 다스려야 할 학교와 교사가 스스로 부정행위를 저지르는 어이 없는 일이 벌어지게 된 것이다. 이는 강력한 유인의 제공이 가져다주는 긍정적 효과를 모두 합친 것을 상쇄하고도 남을 부정적 효과다. 미국의 교육개혁 실험에서 분명하게 드러난 것처럼, 강한 유인을 부여함으로써 공공부문을 개혁한다는 것은 생각하는 것만큼 좋은 방법이 아니다. 특히 유인의 제공이 마치 공공부문의 비효율성을 치료하는 만병통치약이나 되는 듯 과도한 기대를 거는 것은 결코 바람직하지 않다. 공공부문의 개혁에 오히려 더 효과를 발휘할 수 있는 방법은 공공의 이익을 위해 일한다는 자부심을 느끼게 만드는 것일지도 모른다.

大學內의 弘報機能과 大學新聞의 役割에 關한 硏究

李俊球 弘益大學校 敎育硏究所 1978 敎育硏究論叢 Vol.- No.1

This paper aims at the basic study to establish a theory for active use of the function of Public Relations in the college. But this study does not present some concrete plans, for it is carried out only through the references or books. To restore the academic reliability in the college, school authorities should stop the one-way publicty of its policy. The function of public relations should be reexamined for the expression of professors' and students' opinions and active exchange of mutual intention. Overall attention should be paid to college newspaper which plays an improtant part in bringing about effective public relations.