http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
"인생의 의미에 대한 고찰" : 톨스토이와 릭 워렌의 기독교적 접근을 중심으로 According to Christian Approach
최흥순 국립7개대학공동논문집간행위원회 2004 人文學論叢 Vol.4 No.-
As you know, there are lots of philosophical debate about the meaning of our life. But extremely to say, we can devide two kinds of approach for that problem. One is theistic approach, and the other is atheistic approach. In this paper, particularly, I want to research on the meaning of life according to christian approach made by Leo Tolstoi and Rick Warren. The most famous Russian, thinker and writer, Leo Tolstoi tried to find out the real meaning of life in his middle age. But he could not find the meaning and value of our life. Then, he concluded that our life is in vain after he surveyed the whole sciences and philosophies. When he focus on the 'faith' of ordinary people, he suddenly awakened that life has a meaning. He asserted that without faith in God, we have no meaning in our life. Then he turned his attitude from skepticism to real Christianity. The most famous American pastor and bestseller book writer, Rick Warren, who wrote Purpose-Driven Church and Purpose-Drive Life, has a theistic attitude toward meaning of life. He said to us about five purposes for our lives. We were planned for God's pleasure. We were formed for God's family. We were created to become like Christ. We were shaped for serving God. We were made for a mission. Without these five purposes, we can not see our life rightly. He asserted that we were born by God's purpose and for his purpose.
최흥순 국립7개대학공동논문집간행위원회 2003 人文學論叢 Vol.3 No.-
Contemporary philosophers criticize Plato's philosophy, because of his 'Essentialism.' Some logical positivist argue against Plato's writings that made of poems. They said, "Plato's works is a kind of art, not of science. But I think Plato has many faces like great thinkers in human history. Particularly, in this paper, I research at the problem of 'arete'(virtue) and 'episteme'(knowledge). In his writings, he asserted that arete is episteme. If arete is good, then that is real knowledge. If arete is real truth, then it will teach by wiser. What is the main source or academic ground of his assertion as above? That is the 'Idea of Good'. That is the metaphysical substance of Plato's philosophy. That is the bridge of 'theory of knowledge' and 'metaphysics' and 'ethics.' As you know, in Plato's philosophy, the Truth, the Good, and the Beauty are same. In this respect, his argument is too much radical. But when we survey his beautiful ways of thinking, then we enlighten by his elaborate system. Many modern philosophers criticize the philosophy of Plato, but his philosophy is not a old fashioned stuff. His philosophy is a fountain of new thought in world history.