RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        논문(論文) : 현대중국어 "A착(着)VP"구조에 대한 통사분석

        양영매 영남중국어문학회 2015 중국어문학 Vol.0 No.69

        In modern Chinese, some adjectives can accompany “着” a dynamic postposition, and the adjectival phrase “A着” can combine with a verbal phrase to make the “A着VP” structure. The “A着VP” structure is frequently used in actual linguistic discourse, but there have been almost no studies on it. This study aims to look into the types of the “A着VP”structure through analyzing the syntax of the structure and the adjectives and verbs appearing in the structure. According to this study, the “A着VP” structure can be divided into a connection, modification and predicate-object relation depending on the relationship between “A着” and “VP”. Most of the adjectives appearing in this structure are qualitative adjectives but some may be conditional adjectives. It was confirmed that action verbs with semantic features of [+human description] and [+controllable] mainly appeared.

      • KCI등재

        의문대사호응식(疑問代詞呼應式)의 구문의미(構文意味) 연구(硏究)

        양영매 한국중국언어학회 2012 중국언어연구 Vol.0 No.41

        本文提出了現代漢語疑問代詞匹配式的構式義是條件關系的假設。爲了證明這一假設的成立, 本文運用Goldberg(1995)的構式語法理論, 對疑問代詞匹配式所表達的各種關系意義進行了細致的分析。通過分析證明了疑問代詞匹配式是多義性構式, 其中充分條件關系和無條件關系意義是條件關系意義的子部分聯接, 假設關系意義是條件關系意義的隱喩擴展聯接, 循序關系意義是條件關系意義的實例聯接, 從而進一步證明了疑問代詞匹配式的構式義是條件關系。

      • KCI등재

        현대중국어 선택의문형 반어문의 부정의미 연구

        양영매 한국중국언어학회 2014 중국언어연구 Vol.0 No.53

        本文旨在闡明選擇問型反問句的否定義. 爲此,首先重新分析了選擇問型反問句的否定對象,結果論證了選擇問型反問句的否定對象是前提. 倂在此基礎上對選擇問型反問句的否定義進行了分析,得出了選擇問型反問句不僅可以表示部分否定--否定先行選項、後行選項,也可以表示全體否定--否定前後選項的結果. 其次,進壹步分析了選擇問型反問句否定義的形成機制,分析結果表明選擇問型反問句否定義源于其形式---選擇問,因此再壹次證明了疑問和否定相同的觀點. 此外,還從選擇問型反問句識別依據的角度分析了選擇問型反問句否定義的形成機制,結果證明了選擇問型反問句識別依賴于上下文和情景.

      • KCI등재

        현대중국어 수반의미 연동문의 상과 부정 - `V1착(着)V2`구조를 중심으로

        양영매 한국중문학회 2016 中國文學硏究 Vol.0 No.65

        The serial verb construction in modern Chinese is a special construction that shares the same subject, comprises two or more consecutive verbs or verbal phrases and functions as the predicate of the whole sentence. It is syntactically classified into several types according to relations between preceding and following verb: simultaneous movement, mode-movement, movement-object, movement-result, and reciprocal complement. The objective of this thesis is to study the aspect and negation of serial verb construction with the syntactic type of `V1着V2` and semantically accompanying meaning. The results of studying the internal structure of V1着V2 on the basis of movement occurrence time have revealed that the serial verb construction “V1着V2” has the relation of co-occurrence, sequential occurrence, and cross-occurrence. The results of studying the aspect of V1着V2 have revealed that no aspect marker follows V2 in some cases but perfective aspect marker “了,” progressive “着,” and experiential “過” do so in most cases. Finally, the results of studying the negation of V1着V2 have revealed that negative adverbs appear in front of V1 and negate only verb 1. It has been also found that, while negative adverbs follow V2 in some cases, they do not negate the whole sentence but complement the preceding V1.

      • KCI등재

        현대 중국어 선택의문형 반어문의 의미 연구

        양영매 한국중국언어문화연구회 2016 한중언어문화연구 Vol.- No.42

        The research aims to analyze and formulate meanings of rhetorical question of alternative questions through the sematic approach. For this purpose, the paper addresses the recognition conditions of rhetorical question of alternative questions and then, analyzes their meaning structures, and finally, reviews the meaning formation conditions. The results are as follows: First, through analyzing the recognition conditions of rhetorical question of alternative questions, the conditions can be divided into marked types and unmarked ones depending on markedness; marked types also can be classified into direct and indirect markedness. On the other hand, in unmarked types, situational, social morals, general common senses are considered. Second, in semantic structure analysis, based on semantic hierarchy theory proposed by Sebastian Löbner, 2002, the meaning of rhetorical question of alternative questions was analyzed in three ways: expressive meaning, utterance meaning, and communicative one. Additively, its formative structure is expressive plus utterance plus communicative meaning. Third, by analyzing meaning formation condition of rhetorical question of alternative questions, ‘negative meaning’ of rhetorical question of alternative questions, an expressive meaning, was derived from syntactic form of alternative questions, thus the ‘negative meaning’ takes syntactic form of alternative questions as the meaning formation prerequisite. Meanwhile, the others, the conditions of utterance and communicative meanings are mainly context, morality, common sense, etc.

      • KCI등재

        현대중국어 연동문의 완료상과 부정

        양영매 한국중국언어학회 2015 중국언어연구 Vol.0 No.59

        The purpose of this paper is to study the correlation between the perfective aspect and the negation of serial-verb constructions in modern Chinese. For methodology, the distribution patterns of “了, ” a perfective aspect marker that appears at the back of verbs to represent the completion of action or changes of events, were analyzed. The results of the analysis have revealed that, as more than two verbal phrases are continuously used in a serial-verb construction, the perfective aspect marker “了” not only shows various distribution patterns but also changes the meaning of a sentence according to its location. It has been also revealed that the negative adverb “沒(有)” appears only in front of VP1 when it is used to express a negative meaning in serial-verb constructions. In other words, the distribution pattern of the perfective aspect marker “了” is asymmetrical with that of the negative adverb “沒(有)” in the serial-verb constructions of the modern Chinese language.

      • KCI등재

        현대중국어 부정부사와 시간부사의 어순 제약 요소 고찰 -"부(不)"과 "몰(沒)(유(有))를 중심으로

        양영매 한국중국언어학회 2013 중국언어연구 Vol.0 No.49

        本文旨在考察影響現代漢語否定副詞"不","沒(有)"和時間副詞語序的制約因素。幷此,先對否定副詞"不","沒(有)"和時間副詞的語序進行了考察。考察結果表明只用於否定副詞"不``前面的時間副詞有87個; 只用於否定副詞"不"後面的時間副詞只有2個; 可用於否定副詞"不"前或後的時間副詞有31個,不能與否定副詞‘不’共現的時間副詞有12個。而只用於否定副詞"沒(有)"前面的時間副詞有44個; 只用於否定副詞"沒(有)"後面的時間副詞只有1個; 可用於否定副詞"沒(有)"前或後的時間副詞也只有7個,可不能與否定副詞"沒(有)"共現的時間副詞却多達80個。然後,對其中的可用於否定副詞前或後的Ⅲ類時間副詞進行了進壹步的句法、語義、語用分析,對影響現代漢語否定副詞和時間副詞語序的制約因素進行了考察,結果發現除了否定範圍、否定焦點制約否定副詞和時間副詞語序以外,否定副詞、時間副詞與VP的語義上的協調,大語境也影響否定副詞和時間副詞語序。?外,還發現否定副詞、時間副詞與VP的音節數也是壹個制約因素。

      • KCI등재

        논문(論文) : 현대중국어 의문대사호응식 의문대사의 지칭, 양화 의미 형성 기제 연구

        양영매 중국어문연구회 2012 中國語文論叢 Vol.0 No.55

        本文旨在分析疑問代詞匹配式中疑問代詞的指稱義、量化義的形成機制。疑問代詞在表示條件關係的疑問代詞匹配式中不表示疑問,而表示全指、任指、虛指、借指、確指。其中,表示全指、任指的疑問代詞具有全稱量化義,表示虛指、借指、確指的疑問代詞?具有存在量化義。本文??疑問代詞在表示條件關係的疑問代詞匹配式中?失疑問功能,而表示指稱義、量化義是由于構式?制。?外,疑問代詞匹配式中疑問代詞之所以能?表示多種指稱義和量化義是因?受?境的影?。

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼