http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
한국어판 PADUA 강박척도 : 신뢰도와 타당도 Reliability and Validity
박제민,김명정,김성곤,박재흥,강철중,김병철,전명호,김재형,양구범 釜山大學校 醫科大學 精神科學敎室 1998 釜山精神醫學 Vol.7 No.-
This study reports the psychometric peroperties and factorial structure of a Korean version of the Padua Inventory (PI) in clinical (35 patients withobsessive-compulsive disorder and 66 with other psychiatric disorders) and non-clinical (458 including 120 undergraduate medical students) samples. The PI total and subscales showed good internal consistency, convergent and known-group validity. Test-retest reliability with interval of one year was superior to that of obsessive-compulsive subscale of SCL-90R. PI scores of non-clinical sample were lower than those reported in western countries, apart from Dutch sample. Principal component analysis on data from whole sample suggested four-factor solutions, which was comparable to that found in other versions of the PI developed in the western cultures. Items asking urges or worries of breaking or stealing things were separated from the factor 'urges and worries of losing control over motor behavior'. Factor analysis on data from non-clinical sample revealed five-factor solution: being contaminated, checking behaviors, doubting, worries of disasters, and ruminations. The first two factors were very same as the western reports, the other three were comparable to 'impaired control over mental activities', but 'urges and worries of losing control over motor behavior' was not extracted as a separate factor in this study. Needs for cross-cultural study including other Asian countries arise to confirm lower PI scores and different factor structures in this sample reflects Korean-specific or Asian-specific culture.