http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
조용애 ( Cho Yong Ae ),이선희 ( Lee Seon Heui ),김경숙 ( Kim Kyeong Sug ),임효민 ( Im Hyo Min ),김태희 ( Kim Tae Hee ),최미영 ( Choi Mi Young ),서현주 ( Seo Hyun Ju ),박효선 ( Park Hyo Sun ),왕금현 ( Wang Keum Hyun ),김찬희 ( Kim 병원간호사회 2020 임상간호연구 Vol.26 No.2
Purpose: This study aimed to update the previously published nursing practice guideline for oral care. Methods: The guideline were updated according to the manuals developed by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), and a Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Developer Version 1.0. Results: Updated nursing practice guideline for oral care was consisted of 10 domains and 79 recommendations. The number of recommendations in each domain were: 5 general issues, 2 oral care indications, 9 oral assessment, 16 general oral care, 12 oral care for critically ill patients, 16 oral care for cancer patients, 12 oral care for cancer patients with oral complications, 5 oral care education, 1 oral care referral, and 1 documentation and report. In terms of grades for recommendations, 11.4% was grade A, 17.0% was grade B, and 68.2% was grade C. Twelve new recommendations were developed and 7 previous recommendations were deleted. Conclusion: Updated nursing practice guideline for oral care is expected to serve as an evidence-based practice guideline for oral care in South Korea. It is recommended that this guideline be spread to clinical nursing settings nationwide to improve the effectiveness of oral care practice.
권정순(Kwon, Jeong Soon),정재심(Jeong, Jae Sim),김경숙(Kim, Kyeong Sug),김선경(Kim, Sun Kyung),김신미(Kim, Shin Mi),김은현(Kim, Eun Hyeon),서현주(Seo, Hyun Ju),이선희(Lee, Seon Heui),정영선(Jeong, Young Sun),정인숙(Jeong, Ihn Sook 한국근거기반간호학회 2016 근거와 간호 Vol.4 No.1
Purpose: This study was performed to identify the current status of organization and education for evidence-based nursing (EBN) among acute care hospitals in Korea. Methods: Using a questionnaire, the data were collected from 60 acute general hospitals selected conveniently from October to November in 2016. Results: The response rate was 83.3% and the mean number of beds for responded hospitals were 977.83. Responded hospitals appeared to perceive the importance of EBN, though approximately 50% of hospitals showed insufficient status for EBN. EBN project implemented in accordance with institutional support. EBN education courses have operated within hospitals and also have attended at outside courses. Conclusion: The current status of EBN organization and education have identified and it is needed to monitor continuously to activate and expand EBN in clinical settings.
국내 상급종합병원과 종합병원에서의 정맥주입간호실무지침에 대한 태도와 확산정도
은영(Young Eun),구미옥(Mee Ok Gu),조용애(Young Ae Cho),김신미(Shin Mi Kim),정재심(Jae Shim Jeong),권정순(Jeong Soon Kwon),유정숙(Cheong Suk Yoo),정영선(Young Sun Jeong),정인숙(In Sook Jung),김경숙(Kyeong Sug Kim)이선희(Seon Heui Lee 한국근거기반간호학회 2014 근거와 간호 Vol.2 No.1
Purpose: This study was conducted to investigate the level of attitudes to and diffusion of Intravenous infusion nursing practice guideline in advanced general hospitals and general hospitals in Korea. Methods: The subjects were 41 nurses who were in charge of guideline diffusion in 41 advanced general hospitals and general hospitals. Data were collected between September 25 and November 2, 2014 by mail (return rates: 68.3 %). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, and ANOVA with SPSS/WIN 18.0. Results: The average attitude score of guideline among nurses in charge of guideline diffusion were 3.98±0.38 (range 1~5). The average guideline diffusion score and levels of diffusion was 2.26±1.39 (level of “persuasion of nursing knowledge”) for staff nurses, 3.05±0.86 (level of “use sometimes”) for nurses in charge of guideline diffusion, 2.87±0.78 (level of “use sometimes”) for nurse directors. 41.4 % of nursing divisions in 41 hospitals reviewed the intravenous infusion nursing practice guideline, educated the guideline to nurses, and implemented the guideline in clinical practice for guideline diffusion. Conclusion: Study findings indicate that nurses in charge of intravenous infusion nursing practice guideline in hospitals had positive attitude for guideline. The levels of guideline diffusion in hospitals was “persuasion of nursing knowledge” to “use sometimes”. Therefore, the strategies for promoting the diffusion and implementation of guideline in clinical practice in the level of nursing division is needed. Further study of outcome evaluation of guideline implementation will be needed.
국내 상급종합병원과 종합병원 간호사의 정맥주입간호실무지침의 확산정도
은영(Young Eun),구미옥(Mee Ok Gu),조용애(Young Ae Cho),정재심(Jae Shim Jeong),권정순(Jeong Soon Kwon),유정숙(Cheong Suk Yoo5),정영선(Young Sun Jeong),정인숙(In Sook Jung),김경숙(Kyeong Sug Kim),이선희(Seon Heui Lee),서현주(Hyun Ju S 한국근거기반간호학회 2015 근거와 간호 Vol.3 No.1
Purpose: This study was conducted to investigate the extent of diffusion of Intravenous infusion nursing practice guideline among nurses in advanced general hospitals and general hospitals in Korea. Methods: The subjects were 234 nurses who practice the intravenous infusion in 24 advanced general hospitals and general hospitals. Data were collected between October 5 and November 2, 2015 by mail (return rates: 97.5 %). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, and ANOVA with SPSS/ WIN 21. Results: The average guideline diffusion score and levels of diffusion was 3.39±0.58 (level of “use sometimes”). 44 recommendations (46%) were in level of “use always” and 50 recommendations (53%) were in “use sometimes”. Extent of diffusion were significantly different according to present status (F=2.81, p=.040) and education (F=4.35, p=.014). The facilitating factors to use the guideline were education by department of nursing service, convenient composition of guideline and barrier factors were “no time to use the guideline”, “don’t know the guideline” and “there is no guideline at ward”. Conclusion: Extent of diffusion of Intravenous infusion nursing practice guideline among nurses was moderate level. The strategies for promoting the implementation of guideline in clinical practice is needed. Further study of outcome evaluation of guideline implementation will be needed.