The battles of Germantown: Public history and preservation in America's most historic neighborhood during the twentieth century

Young, David W The Ohio State University 2009 해외박사(DDOD)

소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

This dissertation examines how public history and historic preservation have changed during the twentieth century by examining the Germantown neighborhood of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Founded in 1683, Germantown is one of America's most historic neighborhoods, with resonant landmarks related to the nation's political, military, industrial, and cultural history. Efforts to preserve the historic sites of the neighborhood have resulted in the presence of fourteen historic sites and house museums, including sites owned by the National Park Service, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and the City of Philadelphia. Germantown is also a neighborhood where many of the ills that came to beset many American cities in the twentieth century are easy to spot. The 2000 census showed that one quarter of its citizens live at or below the poverty line. Germantown High School recently made national headlines when students there attacked a popular teacher, causing severe injuries. Many businesses and landmark buildings now stand shuttered in community that no longer can draw on the manufacturing or retail economy it once did. Germantown's twentieth century has seen remarkably creative approaches to contemporary problems using historic preservation at their core. What was tried, together with what succeeded and failed, help to explain how urban planning, heritage tourism, architectural preservation and museum studies have evolved in the country overall. Each decade offered examples of attempted solutions and success stories, frequently setting standards for historic preservation nationally. In Germantown's case, history was identified early and throughout the century as a useful tool to build into an economic engine for the neighborhood. And yet, history has not proved to be as beneficial to the neighborhood as had been hoped. Why did history not provide the development spark that people thought it would?. The answer to this question is beset with many ironies to be explored in this study. Germantown's greatest feature, its history, often got in the way. More specifically, the practice of history, locally and more generally, did not always help Germantown's expressed goal to make its history more effective in the economic development of the neighborhood. Beset with many competing groups and unable to overcome entrenched traditions, Germantown's primary selling point, its historic assets, often paradoxically served as a barrier to achieving those goals. Institutional, systemic, and cultural factors have all played in to how Germantown has not been able to take full advantage of its history for the benefit of the entire community. Germantown offers a way to study life in a twentieth century city through the ways that people think about history. Germantown history shows how thinking about preservation went from a notion of attempting to seal off the past in reverent isolation to one of the responsible management of change. The former required authority, the latter requires respect for multiple narratives. The process required the evolution, over many years and many contested issues, of the historical profession as whole.

He polis gar dustokei: The question of Alcibiades in Aristophanes' "Frogs" and Thucydides' History (Greece)

Warren, Brian Matthew The Johns Hopkins University 2003 해외박사(DDOD)

소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

This dissertation investigates the controversies that surround Alcibiades as presented in Aristophanes' <italic>Frogs</italic> and Thucydides' History. In Chapter 1, I use Aristophanes' <italic>Frogs</italic> to illustrate the way in which the question of Alcibiades was a real and immediate historical question for the Athenians. It also introduces two of the basic themes of the controversies that surround Alcibiades also in Thucydides' History: the problematic relation between public and private interest, and the tensions in the relationship between the powerful individual and the city. In Chapter 2, I use Aristotle's <italic>Poetics 9</italic> to begin developing a reading of Thucydides' History which sees Alcibiades as a crucial figure. In Chapter 3, I examine the four passages that pertain to Alcibiades in Thucydides' History which can be classified as narrator interventions. In these passages, Thucydides' evaluation of Alcibiades and his role in Athens' defeat take a very complicated, often “double-edged” form. Furthermore, these passages show that the same issues that emerge in connection with Alcibiades in the <italic>Frogs</italic>—the problematic relation between public and private interest, and the tensions in the relationship between the powerful individual and the city—also receive attention from Thucydides. In Chapter 4, I examine the way in which Thucydides has woven Alcibiades into the fabric of his History. In particular, I examine the parallels between Alcibiades' story and the stories of Pausanias and Themistocles as developed in Book 1 of the History. On a larger scale, Thucydides' History, especially at 6.15, develops an analogy between Alcibiades and Athens which speaks to many of the History's most important themes. Especially at 6.15, there begins to emerge a connection between Thucydides' presentation of Alcibiades and his History's elaboration of <italic>to anthropinion</italic>, the principle according to which events in the past have transpired and will transpire in the same or a similar way. In Chapter 5, I consider three readings of Thucydides' Alcibiades in modern scholarship, those of Westlake, Gribble, and Forde. I conclude by offering a perspective on the profound ambivalence and studied ambiguity of Thucydides' presentation of Alcibiades in terms of Aristotle's categories of rhetoric.

Reading, Interpreting, and Teaching African American History: Examining How African American History Influences the Curricular and Pedagogical Decisions of Preservice Teachers

King, LaGarrett Jarriel The University of Texas at Austin 2012 해외박사(DDOD)

소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

African American history and how it is taught in classroom spaces have been a point of contention with activists, historians, and educators for decades. In it current form, African American history narratives often are ambiguous and truncated, leaving students with a disjointed construction about U.S. history. Additionally, the pedagogical decisions made by teachers regarding African American history are sometimes problematic. To fix this problem, critical scholars have surmised that both pre- and in-service teachers need to be more knowledgeable about African American history. This knowledge will help teachers move past simplistic constructions of the past and provide a transformative educational experience. In essence, these scholars believe that teachers cannot teach [African American history] because they do not know it. This study, however, examines what if they do know [African American history], will they teach it? The purpose of this study was to investigate how knowledge influences teachers’ pedagogical decisions. Using the theoretical and conceptual frameworks of cultural memory and knowledge construction, this qualitative case study explores how four preservice teachers interpreted African American history after engaging in a summer reading program and how that knowledge was implemented in their classroom during their student teaching semester. The reader, entitled A Winding River, was a collection of scholarly journal articles, book chapters, and primary and secondary source documents. Data collection measures included three classroom observations, reflective journals, three interviews, and other classroom documents related to the participant’s student teaching experience. Findings indicate that knowledge acquisition is complex and the process to teach is a generative process. Although, knowledge is an important component in teaching, sociocultural factors also influenced the divergent ways African American history was interpreted and taught. The study indicates that the access of African American history is not always a prerequisite in teaching the subject in transformative ways.

Race, nation and education: Black history during Jim Crow

Snyder, Jeffrey Aaron New York University 2011 해외박사(DDOD)

소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

"Race, Nation and Education: Black History During Jim Crow" traces the cultural and intellectual dimensions of the early black history movement, with an emphasis on the formative role played by the following five scholars--philosopher Alain Locke and historians Carter G. Woodson, Charles Wesley, Rayford Logan and John Hope Franklin. Woodson and his colleagues in the Association for the Study of Negro Life and History researched, wrote and promoted black history as if it were a "life-and-death struggle." "The cause," as Woodson called the movement, spanned the years from 1915 through the 1950s and was both a professional and a grassroots enterprise. It reached all the way from seminars at Howard University to one-room schoolhouses in Alabama and encompassed everything from textbook campaigns to Negro History Week celebrations. This dissertation demonstrates that the study and celebration of black history had a formative influence on some of the most important twentieth-century black institutions and movements from segregated schools and the black press to the Harlem Renaissance and civil rights. It also shows that Woodson and his colleagues turned to history not only to contest racism but also to contest the very idea of "race" itself. With the advent of Negro History Week in 1926, the scope and influence of black history increased dramatically. From the late 1920s through the 1930s, segregated black schools became crucial sites for the transmission of the Harlem Renaissance, broadcasting its art, literature and music to African Americans across the country during their annual Negro History Week celebrations. The emphasis on recovering and showcasing a rich African American artistic and cultural heritage in the 1920s and 30s shifted to an overarching concern, during the 1940s and 50s, with tracing the roots and branches of an energetic black freedom struggle. What remained constant, however, was an almost evangelical faith in the power of history--Association members fervently believed that "the cause" would have a transformative effect on the hearts and minds of women and men, building black pride, on the one hand and reducing white prejudice, on the other.

Cultures of Collection in Late Nineteenth Century American Natural History

Laubacher, Matthew Arizona State University 2011 해외박사(DDOD)

소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

Natural history is, and was, dependent upon the collection of specimens. In the nineteenth century, American naturalists and institutions of natural history cultivated and maintained extensive collection networks comprised of numerous collectors that provided objects of natural history for study. Effective networks were collaborative in nature, with naturalists such as Spencer Baird of the Smithsonian trading their time and expertise for specimens. The incorporation of Darwinian and Neo-Lamarckian evolutionary theory into natural history in the middle of the century led to dramatic changes in the relationship between naturalists and collectors, as naturalists sought to reconcile their observations within the new evolutionary context. This dissertation uses the careers of collectors Robert Kennicott, Frank Stephens, Edward W. Nelson, E.A. Goldman, and Edmund Heller as case studies in order to evaluate how the changes in the theoretical framework of late nineteenth century natural history led to advances in field practice by assessing how naturalists trained their collectors to meet new demands within the field. Research focused on the correspondence between naturalists and collectors, along with the field notes and applicable publications by collectors. I argue that the changes in natural history necessitated naturalists training their collectors in the basics of biogeography -- the study of geographic distribution of organisms, and systematics -- the study of the diversity of life -- leading to a collaborative relationship in which collectors played an active role in the formation of new biological knowledge. The project concludes that the changes in natural history with regard to theory and practice gradually necessitated a more professional cadre of collectors. Collectors became active agents in the formation of biological knowledge, and instrumental in the formation of a truly systematic natural history. As a result, collectors became de facto field naturalists, the forerunners of the field biologists that dominated the practice of natural history in the early and middle twentieth century.

History and human experience in the art of David Wilkie, 1806--1835 (Scotland)

McCurdy, Melinda Ruth University of California, Santa Barbara 2005 해외박사(DDOD)

소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

This dissertation explores the relationship between written and painted history in early nineteenth-century Britain as it was carefully negotiated in the work of Scottish-born artist David Wilkie. In eighteenth-century Britain, historical writing was closely allied with the discipline of rhetoric, designed to persuade its young aristocratic audience to model themselves on the great heroes it described. By the 1824s, however, history had come to be more concerned with social aspects of everyday life that contribute to a broader understanding of a culture and its institutions than with the deeds of heroes and statesmen. This period's re-evaluation of the relationship between individuals and the past also forced a change in written history's visual counterpart, whose sophisticated references to past art geared toward an elite audience had now become obsolete. The major thesis of this dissertation is that the visual language required by new forms of written history evolved out of the work of genre painters, and that it was Wilkie, mainly known as a genre painter, who first successfully used it to express the elevated themes of history painting. I suggest that genre painters, with their focus on everyday life, were better equipped to express the new history than artists working within the stylistic confines of traditional history painting. Through an analysis of three of Wilkie's paintings, contemporary accounts of their reception, and comparisons between his works and those of two of his contemporaries, Benjamin Robert Haydon and Richard Parkes Bonington, I consider how artists struggled to adapt to changing views of history in this period. This study also places Wilkie's art within the contemporary political context in which it was made, when war with France, economic depression, widespread agitation for political reform, and the rise to power of the middle class, challenged Britons' notions of what history meant, and to whom it spoke. A conservative artist with elite patrons, Wilkie found his hybrid works particularly vulnerable to shifting interpretations centered on the struggle between individual enfranchisement and the rights of the established order.

Rehabilitationen Roms: Die roemische Antike in der deutschen Kultur zwischen Winckelmann und Niebuhr

Holzer, Angela Cornelia Princeton University 2011 해외박사(DDOD)

소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

This dissertation uncovers the Roman discourse in late eighteenth century Germany by discussing the characterizations of ancient Rome in art history, historiography and literary theory. The last two decades of the eighteenth century experienced a renewed interest in Roman antiquity. This interest can be fathomed on a quantitative level -- e.g. in an increase in translations of Latin authors -- but it is also perceptible on a theoretical level. The emphasis on the importance of the Greek ideal in German culture after Winckelmann has tended to obscure the continuous reception of, and reflection on Roman antiquity. The negative view of Roman antiquity, especially on the early Roman Empire as part of a critique of French classicism developed by the Storm-and-Stress movement, was not a common attitude in Germany. An analysis of a wider range of texts -- e.g. enlightenment children's books -- shows that there was a heterogeneity of positions toward Rome. The last decades of the eighteenth century moreover demonstrated an interest in early Roman history and, after Edward Gibbon, in the later empire. Characterizations of a "Roman epoch" in world history came to be part of universal history, philosophies of history and literary history. Early Romanticism finally discovered the modernity of Roman antiquity in aesthetic and philosophical regard and postulated the continuing relevance of Rome while devaluing Greece. It thus paved the way for major contributions on Roman history and art history in the nineteenth century. The importance of Roman antiquity was now seen in its function as a culture of transformation. The first part engages Winckelmann's history of art and argues that Winckelmann increasingly engaged with the Roman tradition in his later works and, despite his provocative negation of a Roman style, developed a notion of Roman art. It was, moreover, not common practice to adopt Winckelmann's view on Rome in the decades following his death. F.A. Wolf and Wilhelm von Humboldt, C.G. Heyne and Friedrich Schlegel developed different visions of Rome after Winckelmann, which are also presented in part one. The second part deals with the historiographical discourse on Roman antiquity and especially with the ensuing popularization -- translation, adaptation and transformation -- of French and English historiography in Germany. It emphasizes the increasing importance of the Roman Empire in children's literature of the late Enlightenment. The third part focuses on the early modern genre of Roman antiquities, or "Altertumer", and the ways in which it acquired a new relevance when enriched with autoptic elements that lead to a mixture of textually transmitted and observational knowledge. The fourth part engages the discourse of literary history and aesthetics and argues that during the last years of the eighteenth century, the discovery of the modernity of Roman culture lead to a new perspective on Roman antiquity that was decisive also for the theoretical discourse on Rome during the nineteenth century. The epilog sketches the reflections on the value of the study of Rome on a theoretical level in the historiography and cultural critique of Jacob Burckhardt and Friedrich Nietzsche.

Visual culture in eighteenth-century natural history. Botanical illustrations and expeditions in the Spanish Atlantic

Bleichmar, Daniela Princeton University 2005 해외박사(DDOD)

소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

This dissertation investigates the visual culture of natural history in the eighteenth century and its connection to European colonialism. In the second half of the century, Spain sponsored almost thirty scientific expeditions to its colonies, eight of which focused specifically on natural history. The almost 10,000 images produced by the Spanish expeditions, far from being mere ornamental byproducts of natural history investigation, were central to the project. Expeditions constituted visualization projects that enabled naturalists to identify, translate, transport, and appropriate nature. Natural history, I argue, was an overwhelmingly visual discipline whose notion of sight went beyond the physiological act of seeing to involve acts of expert viewing that required training and specialized practices of observation and representation---not sight, but insight. This visual culture of science was very much a material one linking vision to images, drawn or engraved, and to specimens in collections. Furthermore, the act of viewing nature was inextricably linked to colonialism, as visual culture allowed Europeans to identify, translate, transport, and appropriate foreign natures. The visual culture of nature can not be divorced from its colonial exploitation. More than mere representations, images acted as visual avatars replacing objects that did not survive travel and would otherwise remain unseen and unknown by Europeans. Images defined nature as a series of transportable objects whose identity and importance was divorced from the environment where they grew or the culture of its inhabitants. Pictures were used to reject the local as contingent, subjective, and translatable, favoring instead the dislocated global as objective, truthful, and permanent. In the Spanish Americas, however, hybrid scientific and artistic traditions emerged, presenting alternatives that contested and reappropriated nature from this European uniforming vision. The dissertation discusses, among other topics, the status and uses of images in eighteenth-century natural history; the importance of visual material in training the expert eyes and skilled hands of naturalists, artists, and collectors; the role of print culture in establishing a common vocabulary of scientific illustration, and the ways in which colonial naturalists and artists appropriated and transformed European models, producing hybrid, local representations.

Time's visible surface: Alois Riegl's art history and the discourse on temporality in fin-de-siecle Austria

Gubser, Michael Donald University of California, Berkeley 2001 해외박사(DDOD)

소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

This dissertation considers the seminal work of the art historian Alois Riegl, specifically his concepts of temporality and history, within the context of the fin-de-siècle Austrian academic milieu. One of the foremost late-nineteenth-century architects of the modern discipline of art history, Riegl helped to establish his field as an autonomous discipline by distinguishing its subject matter, thematic goals, and analytic methods from the parent disciplines of history and aesthetics. His work has attracted increasing attention toward the end of the twentieth century because of its impact on such figures as Erwin Panofsky and Walter Benjamin. My dissertation has two primary aims. First, whereas most interpreters of Riegl focus on his notion of <italic>Kunstwollen</italic> or his theories of representation, I approach Riegl's oeuvre as a sustained investigation of the categories of temporality and history. I examine Riegl's notion of the relationship between time, history, and art as it developed from his earliest essays on calendars through his later work on the Roman art industry and Dutch group portraiture. I argue that Riegl's concept of art was fundamentally temporal in constitution; artworks registered the movement of historical time in a formal manner, rendering temporality in visible forms that were available for the empirical investigations of the historian. Thus Riegl's work can be fit within the methodological debates in the human sciences of the late nineteenth century. The second aim of this dissertation is to challenge a pervasive assumption in the recent literature on Austrian cultural and intellectual history, namely, that Austrian modernism adopted a self-consciously ahistorical stance in its investigations of social, cultural, and political phenomena. Faced with political and social turmoil and a nineteenth-century history of decline, so the argument runs, the Austrian cultural elite turned away from history and sought out alternate fields of inquiry that might explain contemporary problems, suggest redemptive solutions, or provide escapes from the social world. By embedding Riegl's analysis of temporality within a broader discourse on time, history, and empiricism that engaged his teachers at the University of Vienna, this dissertation challenges the ahistoricist characterization of Austrian culture. Among the figures discussed are the philosophers Franz Brentano and Robert Zimmermann, the historians Theodor yon Sickel and Max Büdinger, and the art historians Moritz Thausing and Franz Wickhoff.

The re-appropriation of the past: History and politics in Soviet Armenia, 1988--1991

Krikorian, Robert Owen Harvard University 2003 해외박사(DDOD)

소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

Historical narratives played an important role in the undermining of Soviet rule in Armenia during the final years of the Soviet Union. Competing, non-Communist interpretations of history influenced large segments of the population, which in turn led to a “divorce from Sovietism,” and ultimately to secession from the USSR. History was contested terrain over which battles were waged for the “hearts and minds of the nation.” In the Armenian case, history was a tool for mobilizing the resources of the nation in its struggle against Soviet central authorities as well as its neighbor Azerbaijan. The political mobilization and manipulation of history by the Soviets over many decades succeeded in subordinating history to the ideological and strategic needs of the Communist Party. During the relative freedom of glasnost, Armenians began to reassess their past and take issue with the prevailing grand historical narrative of Armenian history constructed by the Soviets. In this narrative, Russia played the role of liberator and savior of the Armenian people, with the Armenians themselves cast in a subordinate role. Given the hardships suffered by the Armenians in the past, including the 1915 Genocide by the Ottoman Turks, this Soviet Armenian grand historical narrative remained the dominant paradigm until the beginning of 1988 and the advent of the Karabagh movement in Armenia. The present study argues that a major paradigm shift occurred in February 1988, when Armenians in the Azerbaijani city of Sumgait were subjected to a pogrom. This one event, more than any other, shattered the tacit social contract between the Soviet state and the Armenian people, whereby loyalty was exchanged for the physical inviolability of the Armenian nation. This social contract was itself based on a particular construction and reading of history. After Sumgait, Armenians began to explore the causes for their inclusion within the USSR. Based on fieldwork in Soviet Armenia from 1988 to 1991, as well as subsequent archival research, this work demonstrates how, from 1988 to the end of the Soviet Union in 1991, the de-construction of Soviet history in Armenia contributed to a vigorous debate regarding the state of affairs in the country. A re-assessment of the Armenian past and the undoing of Soviet revisionism undermined the pillars of Soviet rule in Armenia and led to an irreversible crisis of legitimacy.