http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : 이덕수(李德壽) (검색결과 2 건)
-
18世紀 館閣文學 硏究 : 李宜顯, 李德壽, 徐命膺을 중심으로
본고는 18世紀 館閣文學의 한 樣相을 究明하는 것을 目的으로 삼고, 이 목적을 위하여 陶谷 李宜顯(1669~1745)·西堂 李德壽(1673~1744)·保晩齋 徐命膺(1716~1787)을 논의의 대상으로 삼아, 이들의 문장론과 관각문학 작품을 考察하였다. 특히 이들의 문장론과 관각문학 작품 사이의 연계성에 초점을 맞추어 玉冊文·頒敎文·祭文을 중심으로 관각문학 작품의 양식적 구조와 표현방식, 풍격의 특징, 주제의식을 考究하였다. 지금까지의 논의를 요약하여 본 논문의 결론으로 삼고자 한다.
-
장윤선 경북대학교 교육대학원 2008 국내석사
Seo-dang Lee Duk soo (1673-1744, character : In-no, pen name : Seo-dang, Byeok-gye) was an intellectual who took two times the Myun-hyeon g(the governmental position of greatest scholars) in the Yeong-jo era, at the end of Chosun dynasty. He wrote 169 biji proses, which are Sindobimyung (18 pieces), Myogalmyung(63 pieces, inscriptions on a gravestone), and Myojimyung(88 pieces, which are put in graves) in his collection of works. Because of the distortion of factions and the intensification of the party strife, the bijiryu prose was broken away from practical writings and degraded to the tool for political fights at that time. Recognizing the evil of the literary world, Seo-dang tried to recover it in a right way. So he wanted to present the right direction of the prose by means of the bijiryu prose which formally changed little for long among the oldest proses. We are going to see the features of the bijiryu prose of Seo-dang. They are summarized as follows. First, Most of his bijiryu works were written in an original form. That is, under the existing stylistic cognition that demands both historiographers' talent and a historical view and at the same time calls for a person to write as based on the truth, he organized them with the reason he writes bijiryu proses, one's native place and family line, officers' career, Biju's personality(Biju, a dead man, a star in his prose), family relations, simple arguments, the date of one's death, funerals , and burial places. So, his works can be regarded as featureless proses that have nothing to get from a literary point of view, and were written only from a practical aspect. Once we examine closely the conditions of that time, however, we can see that the bijiryu proses were being broken away from the scope of the practical literature. Nevertheless, at this situation, it rather seems that the works of Seo-dang who left so many graceful works of original form are worth enough to be illuminated at a new point of view. Second, when someone asked him to write about a dead man he didn't know well, as he made clear that he couldn't refuse it because of the humanity he tried to make the construction of the prose most strict and fair. I think he did so because he worried that he would be spotted as Yumyo(a man who highly flatter). So while he wrote about Biju with the help of the people he is familiar with he made an great effort to find a way to intensify the objectivity of the works. Third, Seo-dang left so many bijiryu pieces about the family members and the close acquaintances who died early. As time goes on, the bijiryu works were pulled out from the means for writing about Biju's lifetime and were used to express writers' opinion and feeling. Then maybe biji was enough for Seo-dang who endlessly reflected on and was worried about sentences to express his own opinion. And he And he tried to put the trueness to composition of description ordinary anecdote and memorial scenes, and once expressed sorrows extremely by describing the situation of death very sincerely. Four, the object of the Bijiryu prose work of Seo-dang was most the man who he admired associated. We know that the men were deep in Hyo-woo (to act with duty their parent and brothers and sisters), not swept in their party policy and were scholastically superior person. He had a firm belief that not swept in a faction according to the teaching of the departed of his father. He was annoyed by the prevailing state of society of present generlation scholars that did Guijihak(shallow study of quoting another person) and had Ahngosubi (a good critical eye with no executive skill). And Seo-dang sometimes criticized the politician chasing his rich and honor who didn’t think of politics for common people. So Seo-dang was tried to put his world of thought to "Biji" space. So for coming to deliver to descendant people, he expressed by composing Ui-non(a subject argument) especially on Biju who has moral influence and good conduct, who was possible to leave his name behind in his achievement
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
