RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고려 후기 얼자(孽子)의 지위 향상과 그 역사적 배경 = Elevation in the status of the “concubines’ sons”(孽子) : Historical background

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100970212

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Examined in this article are the Seo’eol figures of the Goryeo period, who were also the former version of the Joseon Seo’eol figures. They were called as a whole as ‘Seo/Eol’ in Joseon, but in Goryeo there was a strict distinction between ‘Seo(庶)’ and ‘Eol(孼).’ In the early half of the Goryeo period, the latter(“Eolja” figures) were not allowed to be appointed to governmental positions, and the former(“Seoja” figures) were in some cases restricted from applying for the dynastic competitive examination and was not allowed to rise above certain level of posts inside the government.
      But coming into the second half of the Goryeo period, not only cases of Seoja figures but also those of Eolja figures, in which they were able to apply for the dynastic exam and rise to the highest level of posts inside the government, started to emerge. We can see such changes inside the royal family as well, as the Eolja sons of the king, who were formerly without any right to claim succession to the throne and were forced to become Buddhist priests, were now entitled to become governmental officials or receive honorary entitlements. We can see that from the case of King Gongmin-wang’s Eolja son Wang Wu, who was enthroned in 1374 as Gongmin-wang’s successor.
      Elevation in the Eolja figures’ status in the second half of the Goryeo period was enabled in the wake of the Yuan imperial government’s strong and steady influences and interventions into Goryeo internal affairs. At first, the Eolja figures mounted individual attempts and efforts to use the situation to their advantage. And when they grew sufficiently accustomed to the Yuan imperial order, their acknowledgement of the Yuan order, its law codes which were not without Chinese elements, and the Chinese nature of such behavioral protocols, all enabled them to accept the notion that Eolja figures deserve new chances and especially avenues of career advancement which were not available for them before. The Yuan law code which dictated and defined the status and rights of the ‘Seo(庶)’ figures literally granted the Seo and Eol figures in Goryeo the right to claim fiscal properties and career opportunities. The Goryeo leadership, including all the Confucian intellectuals, positively responded to the situation and recognized the Eolja figures’ political and social rights. Their status elevation did not involve anything abnormal or illegal, and even after Yuan lost its influences, they maintained such elevated status, which explain how the social status of the Seo/Eol figures in the early half of the Joseon period came to be established.
      번역하기

      Examined in this article are the Seo’eol figures of the Goryeo period, who were also the former version of the Joseon Seo’eol figures. They were called as a whole as ‘Seo/Eol’ in Joseon, but in Goryeo there was a strict distinction between ‘...

      Examined in this article are the Seo’eol figures of the Goryeo period, who were also the former version of the Joseon Seo’eol figures. They were called as a whole as ‘Seo/Eol’ in Joseon, but in Goryeo there was a strict distinction between ‘Seo(庶)’ and ‘Eol(孼).’ In the early half of the Goryeo period, the latter(“Eolja” figures) were not allowed to be appointed to governmental positions, and the former(“Seoja” figures) were in some cases restricted from applying for the dynastic competitive examination and was not allowed to rise above certain level of posts inside the government.
      But coming into the second half of the Goryeo period, not only cases of Seoja figures but also those of Eolja figures, in which they were able to apply for the dynastic exam and rise to the highest level of posts inside the government, started to emerge. We can see such changes inside the royal family as well, as the Eolja sons of the king, who were formerly without any right to claim succession to the throne and were forced to become Buddhist priests, were now entitled to become governmental officials or receive honorary entitlements. We can see that from the case of King Gongmin-wang’s Eolja son Wang Wu, who was enthroned in 1374 as Gongmin-wang’s successor.
      Elevation in the Eolja figures’ status in the second half of the Goryeo period was enabled in the wake of the Yuan imperial government’s strong and steady influences and interventions into Goryeo internal affairs. At first, the Eolja figures mounted individual attempts and efforts to use the situation to their advantage. And when they grew sufficiently accustomed to the Yuan imperial order, their acknowledgement of the Yuan order, its law codes which were not without Chinese elements, and the Chinese nature of such behavioral protocols, all enabled them to accept the notion that Eolja figures deserve new chances and especially avenues of career advancement which were not available for them before. The Yuan law code which dictated and defined the status and rights of the ‘Seo(庶)’ figures literally granted the Seo and Eol figures in Goryeo the right to claim fiscal properties and career opportunities. The Goryeo leadership, including all the Confucian intellectuals, positively responded to the situation and recognized the Eolja figures’ political and social rights. Their status elevation did not involve anything abnormal or illegal, and even after Yuan lost its influences, they maintained such elevated status, which explain how the social status of the Seo/Eol figures in the early half of the Joseon period came to be established.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 머리말
      • 1. 얼자(?子)의 관직 진출과 왕위 계승
      • 2. 원 법률의 적용과 한족 예제(禮制)의 긍정
      • 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • 머리말
      • 1. 얼자(?子)의 관직 진출과 왕위 계승
      • 2. 원 법률의 적용과 한족 예제(禮制)의 긍정
      • 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 지승종, "조선전기의 서얼신분" 27 : 1991

      2 배재홍, "조선전기 처첩분간과 서얼" 41 : 1991

      3 박천규, "조선전기 서얼의 사회적 지위" 30 : 1980

      4 배재홍, "조선시대 천첩자녀의 종량과 서얼신분 귀속" 3 : 1994

      5 신동근, "조선시대 서얼의 신분적 지위와 재산소유" 영남공업전문대학 18 : 1989

      6 배재홍, "조선시대 서얼 차대론과 통용론" 21 : 1998

      7 최이돈, "조선 초기 서얼의 차대와 신분" 역사학회 (204) : 141-187, 2009

      8 이태진, "서얼차대고" 27 : 1965

      9 노명호, "고려시대의 다원적 천하관과 해동천자" 105 : 1999

      10 허흥식, "고려시대 소군의 신분상 특성" 1992

      1 지승종, "조선전기의 서얼신분" 27 : 1991

      2 배재홍, "조선전기 처첩분간과 서얼" 41 : 1991

      3 박천규, "조선전기 서얼의 사회적 지위" 30 : 1980

      4 배재홍, "조선시대 천첩자녀의 종량과 서얼신분 귀속" 3 : 1994

      5 신동근, "조선시대 서얼의 신분적 지위와 재산소유" 영남공업전문대학 18 : 1989

      6 배재홍, "조선시대 서얼 차대론과 통용론" 21 : 1998

      7 최이돈, "조선 초기 서얼의 차대와 신분" 역사학회 (204) : 141-187, 2009

      8 이태진, "서얼차대고" 27 : 1965

      9 노명호, "고려시대의 다원적 천하관과 해동천자" 105 : 1999

      10 허흥식, "고려시대 소군의 신분상 특성" 1992

      11 이정란, "고려시대 서얼 연구" 고려대학교 2003

      12 李康漢, "고려 충선왕의 국정 및 ‘구제’ 복원" 진단학회 (105) : 73-109, 2008

      13 이정란, "高麗 王家의 龍孫意識과 왕권의 변동" 고려사학회 (55) : 7-41, 2014

      14 李奭, "元朝中期 法典編纂 硏究와 [至正條格]의 發見" 동양사학회 83 : 6-202, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼