Examined in this article are the Seo’eol figures of the Goryeo period, who were also the former version of the Joseon Seo’eol figures. They were called as a whole as ‘Seo/Eol’ in Joseon, but in Goryeo there was a strict distinction between ‘...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100970212
2015
Korean
900
KCI등재
학술저널
163-191(29쪽)
5
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Examined in this article are the Seo’eol figures of the Goryeo period, who were also the former version of the Joseon Seo’eol figures. They were called as a whole as ‘Seo/Eol’ in Joseon, but in Goryeo there was a strict distinction between ‘...
Examined in this article are the Seo’eol figures of the Goryeo period, who were also the former version of the Joseon Seo’eol figures. They were called as a whole as ‘Seo/Eol’ in Joseon, but in Goryeo there was a strict distinction between ‘Seo(庶)’ and ‘Eol(孼).’ In the early half of the Goryeo period, the latter(“Eolja” figures) were not allowed to be appointed to governmental positions, and the former(“Seoja” figures) were in some cases restricted from applying for the dynastic competitive examination and was not allowed to rise above certain level of posts inside the government.
But coming into the second half of the Goryeo period, not only cases of Seoja figures but also those of Eolja figures, in which they were able to apply for the dynastic exam and rise to the highest level of posts inside the government, started to emerge. We can see such changes inside the royal family as well, as the Eolja sons of the king, who were formerly without any right to claim succession to the throne and were forced to become Buddhist priests, were now entitled to become governmental officials or receive honorary entitlements. We can see that from the case of King Gongmin-wang’s Eolja son Wang Wu, who was enthroned in 1374 as Gongmin-wang’s successor.
Elevation in the Eolja figures’ status in the second half of the Goryeo period was enabled in the wake of the Yuan imperial government’s strong and steady influences and interventions into Goryeo internal affairs. At first, the Eolja figures mounted individual attempts and efforts to use the situation to their advantage. And when they grew sufficiently accustomed to the Yuan imperial order, their acknowledgement of the Yuan order, its law codes which were not without Chinese elements, and the Chinese nature of such behavioral protocols, all enabled them to accept the notion that Eolja figures deserve new chances and especially avenues of career advancement which were not available for them before. The Yuan law code which dictated and defined the status and rights of the ‘Seo(庶)’ figures literally granted the Seo and Eol figures in Goryeo the right to claim fiscal properties and career opportunities. The Goryeo leadership, including all the Confucian intellectuals, positively responded to the situation and recognized the Eolja figures’ political and social rights. Their status elevation did not involve anything abnormal or illegal, and even after Yuan lost its influences, they maintained such elevated status, which explain how the social status of the Seo/Eol figures in the early half of the Joseon period came to be established.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 지승종, "조선전기의 서얼신분" 27 : 1991
2 배재홍, "조선전기 처첩분간과 서얼" 41 : 1991
3 박천규, "조선전기 서얼의 사회적 지위" 30 : 1980
4 배재홍, "조선시대 천첩자녀의 종량과 서얼신분 귀속" 3 : 1994
5 신동근, "조선시대 서얼의 신분적 지위와 재산소유" 영남공업전문대학 18 : 1989
6 배재홍, "조선시대 서얼 차대론과 통용론" 21 : 1998
7 최이돈, "조선 초기 서얼의 차대와 신분" 역사학회 (204) : 141-187, 2009
8 이태진, "서얼차대고" 27 : 1965
9 노명호, "고려시대의 다원적 천하관과 해동천자" 105 : 1999
10 허흥식, "고려시대 소군의 신분상 특성" 1992
1 지승종, "조선전기의 서얼신분" 27 : 1991
2 배재홍, "조선전기 처첩분간과 서얼" 41 : 1991
3 박천규, "조선전기 서얼의 사회적 지위" 30 : 1980
4 배재홍, "조선시대 천첩자녀의 종량과 서얼신분 귀속" 3 : 1994
5 신동근, "조선시대 서얼의 신분적 지위와 재산소유" 영남공업전문대학 18 : 1989
6 배재홍, "조선시대 서얼 차대론과 통용론" 21 : 1998
7 최이돈, "조선 초기 서얼의 차대와 신분" 역사학회 (204) : 141-187, 2009
8 이태진, "서얼차대고" 27 : 1965
9 노명호, "고려시대의 다원적 천하관과 해동천자" 105 : 1999
10 허흥식, "고려시대 소군의 신분상 특성" 1992
11 이정란, "고려시대 서얼 연구" 고려대학교 2003
12 李康漢, "고려 충선왕의 국정 및 ‘구제’ 복원" 진단학회 (105) : 73-109, 2008
13 이정란, "高麗 王家의 龍孫意識과 왕권의 변동" 고려사학회 (55) : 7-41, 2014
14 李奭, "元朝中期 法典編纂 硏究와 [至正條格]의 發見" 동양사학회 83 : 6-202, 2003
[총론] 동아시아적 관점에서 본 한국 고대 군제(軍制)
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2005-10-05 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL | ![]() |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2001-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
1998-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.87 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.87 | 0.92 | 1.68 | 0.36 |