RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    지적장애학생과 비장애학생의 일기에 나타난 문장 특성

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12889444

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      경산 : 대구대학교, 2012

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 대구대학교 특수교육대학원 , 특수교육학과 , 2012. 8

    • 발행연도

      2012

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      379

    • 발행국(도시)

      경상북도

    • 기타서명

      A study of the characteristics of sentences based on diary of students with and without intellectual disabilities

    • 형태사항

      ⅲ, 71p. : 삽화 ; 26cm

    • 일반주기명

      대구대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수:박찬웅
      참고문헌 : pp.53-57

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 대구대학교 학술정보원 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Writing is a medium of communication and social activities as a member of the community. It is a means of communicating with others. However, Writing activities for students with intellectual disabilities are not being done enough in the field because of the characteristics of them. Analysis and comprehension of the level of students' writing should be first to teach students with intellectual disabilities who have difficulty in writing.
    The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of sentences based on diary for with and without intellectual disabilities. The subjects of this study are 20 students with intellectual disabilities who attend special middle school and 20 primary school students without intellectual disabilities who attend primary school in Daegu.
    The works for this study are living diary written by themselves without a teacher or guardian's help. Those are collected 20 works per each students.
    In this study, frequency-percentage and t-test use to find out the differences between students with and without intellectual disabilities about the sentence length, the words used, the sentence types and the type of sentence errors.
    The results of this study can be summarized as follows.

    First, students with intellectual disabilities use shorter length of the sentence than students without intellectual disabilities. Students with intellectual disabilities use about 7 words in a sentence. Students without intellectual disabilities use about 9 words in a sentence. Students without intellectual disabilities use more words in a work piece than students with intellectual disabilities. Both Students mainly use substantives, subject particle, verb in their works. But, students without intellectual disabilities use them more.

    Second, students with intellectual disabilities use more short sentences than complex sentences. But, students without intellectual disabilities use more complex sentences than short sentences. Students with and without intellectual disabilities are primarily used a declarative sentence. Both students mostly use 'subject + adverbs + verbs' and 'subject + object + adverbs + verbs' in their works.

    Third, there are differences of the type of sentence errors between students with and without intellectual disabilities. Sentences of the students with intellectual disabilities include more sentence errors than sentences of the students without intellectual disabilities in missing sentence elements, duplicating or misusing sentence elements, misusing of subject particle, spelling, punctuation. Sentences of the students with intellectual disabilities show mostly punctuation, spelling, spacing errors.
    번역하기

    Writing is a medium of communication and social activities as a member of the community. It is a means of communicating with others. However, Writing activities for students with intellectual disabilities are not being done enough in the field because...

    Writing is a medium of communication and social activities as a member of the community. It is a means of communicating with others. However, Writing activities for students with intellectual disabilities are not being done enough in the field because of the characteristics of them. Analysis and comprehension of the level of students' writing should be first to teach students with intellectual disabilities who have difficulty in writing.
    The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of sentences based on diary for with and without intellectual disabilities. The subjects of this study are 20 students with intellectual disabilities who attend special middle school and 20 primary school students without intellectual disabilities who attend primary school in Daegu.
    The works for this study are living diary written by themselves without a teacher or guardian's help. Those are collected 20 works per each students.
    In this study, frequency-percentage and t-test use to find out the differences between students with and without intellectual disabilities about the sentence length, the words used, the sentence types and the type of sentence errors.
    The results of this study can be summarized as follows.

    First, students with intellectual disabilities use shorter length of the sentence than students without intellectual disabilities. Students with intellectual disabilities use about 7 words in a sentence. Students without intellectual disabilities use about 9 words in a sentence. Students without intellectual disabilities use more words in a work piece than students with intellectual disabilities. Both Students mainly use substantives, subject particle, verb in their works. But, students without intellectual disabilities use them more.

    Second, students with intellectual disabilities use more short sentences than complex sentences. But, students without intellectual disabilities use more complex sentences than short sentences. Students with and without intellectual disabilities are primarily used a declarative sentence. Both students mostly use 'subject + adverbs + verbs' and 'subject + object + adverbs + verbs' in their works.

    Third, there are differences of the type of sentence errors between students with and without intellectual disabilities. Sentences of the students with intellectual disabilities include more sentence errors than sentences of the students without intellectual disabilities in missing sentence elements, duplicating or misusing sentence elements, misusing of subject particle, spelling, punctuation. Sentences of the students with intellectual disabilities show mostly punctuation, spelling, spacing errors.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 의의 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 5
    • 3. 용어의 정의 5
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 의의 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 5
    • 3. 용어의 정의 5
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 7
    • 1. 문장 길이와 단어 구성 7
    • 2. 문장 종류와 문형 10
    • 3. 문장 오류의 유형 14
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 19
    • 1. 연구 대상 19
    • 2. 연구 도구 20
    • 3. 연구 절차 27
    • 4. 자료 처리 27
    • Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의 28
    • 1. 문장 길이와 단어의 구성 28
    • 2. 문장 종류와 문형 38
    • 3. 문장 오류의 유형 44
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 51
    • 1. 결 론 51
    • 2. 제 언 52
    • 참고문헌 53
    • 영문초록 58
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼