RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국내 e-러닝 개발과정과 모형개발요구 탐색 = A Study on e-learning ID Processes and Instructional Designer`s Need Analysis on e-Learning Design & Development Models

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959373

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the e-learning design & development process which has been conducted by e-learning instructional designers/PM in Korea and identify their needs about developing an e-learning design & development model that can guide instructional designers` activities. A survey and an in-depth interview with instructional designers/PM were conducted. The survey data of 40 instructional designers/PM and the interview data of 9 instructional designers/PM were collected and analyzed. The results of research were as follows. First, the e-learning design & development process included the ADDIE process, and design phase and development phase concurrently occurred. The learner analysis, context analysis, and pilot test were not conducted usually and the evaluation activities(learner evaluation, course evaluation) were conducted by a managing team instead of instructional designers/PM. Working with SMEs is very important in the planning/design phase and developing a prototype is also an important activity in the design phase. Instructional designers decided instructional strategies with considering the type of learning content by dividing it into three types: knowledge acquisition, knowledge application, and attitude change. Most of e-learning companies had job procedure documents or a model for developing e-learning courses, but the need for developing a new model or improving the existing model was very high. In developing a new e-learning design & development model, instructional designers/PM wanted to include the following: the concrete guidance for selecting appropriate instructional strategies, need analysis activities, contents analysis & design, macro-micro instructional design activities, guidance for working with SMEs, rapid prototyping, evaluation activities, PM`s management activities, quality control, feedback & revision process, etc. They expected that a new model(or improved model) is selectively utilized by instructional designers according to a given e-learning project situation, and sample examples or checklists for guiding instructional designer`s performance are provided.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the e-learning design & development process which has been conducted by e-learning instructional designers/PM in Korea and identify their needs about developing an e-learning design & development model that...

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the e-learning design & development process which has been conducted by e-learning instructional designers/PM in Korea and identify their needs about developing an e-learning design & development model that can guide instructional designers` activities. A survey and an in-depth interview with instructional designers/PM were conducted. The survey data of 40 instructional designers/PM and the interview data of 9 instructional designers/PM were collected and analyzed. The results of research were as follows. First, the e-learning design & development process included the ADDIE process, and design phase and development phase concurrently occurred. The learner analysis, context analysis, and pilot test were not conducted usually and the evaluation activities(learner evaluation, course evaluation) were conducted by a managing team instead of instructional designers/PM. Working with SMEs is very important in the planning/design phase and developing a prototype is also an important activity in the design phase. Instructional designers decided instructional strategies with considering the type of learning content by dividing it into three types: knowledge acquisition, knowledge application, and attitude change. Most of e-learning companies had job procedure documents or a model for developing e-learning courses, but the need for developing a new model or improving the existing model was very high. In developing a new e-learning design & development model, instructional designers/PM wanted to include the following: the concrete guidance for selecting appropriate instructional strategies, need analysis activities, contents analysis & design, macro-micro instructional design activities, guidance for working with SMEs, rapid prototyping, evaluation activities, PM`s management activities, quality control, feedback & revision process, etc. They expected that a new model(or improved model) is selectively utilized by instructional designers according to a given e-learning project situation, and sample examples or checklists for guiding instructional designer`s performance are provided.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한국생산성본부, "한 권으로 끝내는 이러닝 교수설계 실무" 한국생산성본부 정보문화원 2008

      2 조은순, "최상의 학습 성과를 위한 e-러닝의 활용" 한국능률협회 2002

      3 나일주, "웹기반 가상교육 프로그램 설계를 위한 활동모형 개발" 17 (17): 27-52, 2000

      4 강명희, "미래를 생각하는 e-러닝 콘텐츠 설계" 서현사 2007

      5 장명희, "기업 e-러닝 인력 연수 프로그램 개발 및 운영" 한국직업능력개발원 2004

      6 오은경, "국내 e-Learning 교수설계자의 역량 조사" 이화여자대학교 2004

      7 박기용, "교수설계 모형과 실천 간의 차이와 원인분석" 23 (23): 1-30, 2007

      8 정인성, "가상기업교육 설계를 위한 Network-Based ISD 모형. 21세기 한국기업교육의 나아갈 길" 41-63, 1997

      9 김영신, "e-Learning 교수설계자의 교수설계 수행활동 사례 및 실태 연구" 숙명여자대학교 2006

      10 Driscoll,M., "Web-based training: Creating e-learning experiences" Jossey- Bass/ Pfeiffer 2002

      1 한국생산성본부, "한 권으로 끝내는 이러닝 교수설계 실무" 한국생산성본부 정보문화원 2008

      2 조은순, "최상의 학습 성과를 위한 e-러닝의 활용" 한국능률협회 2002

      3 나일주, "웹기반 가상교육 프로그램 설계를 위한 활동모형 개발" 17 (17): 27-52, 2000

      4 강명희, "미래를 생각하는 e-러닝 콘텐츠 설계" 서현사 2007

      5 장명희, "기업 e-러닝 인력 연수 프로그램 개발 및 운영" 한국직업능력개발원 2004

      6 오은경, "국내 e-Learning 교수설계자의 역량 조사" 이화여자대학교 2004

      7 박기용, "교수설계 모형과 실천 간의 차이와 원인분석" 23 (23): 1-30, 2007

      8 정인성, "가상기업교육 설계를 위한 Network-Based ISD 모형. 21세기 한국기업교육의 나아갈 길" 41-63, 1997

      9 김영신, "e-Learning 교수설계자의 교수설계 수행활동 사례 및 실태 연구" 숙명여자대학교 2006

      10 Driscoll,M., "Web-based training: Creating e-learning experiences" Jossey- Bass/ Pfeiffer 2002

      11 Davidson-Shivers,G., "Web-based learning: design, implementation, and evaluation. Upper Saddle River" Pearson Education 2006

      12 Visscher-Voerman,I., "Paradigms in theory and practice of education and training design" 52 (52): 60-89, 2004

      13 Dabbagh,N., "Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River" Pearson Education 2005

      14 Lee,W.W., "Multimedia-based instructional design" Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer 2000

      15 Allen,M.W., "Michael Allen's guide to e-learning" John Wiley & Sons 2003

      16 Richey,R.C., "Instructional design competences: The standards" ERIC Clearninghouse on Instruction and Technology 2001

      17 Alonso,F., "An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach" 36 (36): 217-235, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼