Generally, food acceptability is determined within an implicit frame shaped by an integration of personal, environmental, and contextual factors. The acceptability rating is prone to change when the frame shifts. We investigated the effect of implicit...
Generally, food acceptability is determined within an implicit frame shaped by an integration of personal, environmental, and contextual factors. The acceptability rating is prone to change when the frame shifts. We investigated the effect of implicit frame constructed by flavor principles on the stability of liking ratings of instant noodles and on the change of food neophobia, and also the effect of neophobia on the preference of instant noodles cross-culturally.
Chinese(n=258) and Koreans(n=263) were recruited. The implicit frame was manipulated by exposing consumers to various instant noodles composed different ethnic flavor principles prior to tasting the target samples. Two noodles with the highest market share in China(T_CHN) and Korea(T_KOR) were chosen as the targets. Consumers were split into five groups and were allocated to one of the five frame conditions (1_general Asian, 2_Chinese, 3_Korean, 4_ no frame T_CHN, 5_no frame T_KOR). Consumers in the Asian frame tasted three noodles popular in Indonesia, Thai, and Japan prior to the two target noodles. Three Chinese and three Korean noodles were served prior to the two targets in Chinese and Korean flavor frame. Two groups of consumers within each country served as control groups and tasted a single sample, either T_CHN or T_KOR, without exposure to other products. All consumers rated the liking of samples using a 9-point hedonic scale and the food neophobia scale (FNS) was used to measure the degree of fear of new foods.
The Chinese control groups gave mean scores 7.0 and 6.6 on overall liking (OL) for T_CHN and T_KOR, respectively. Koreans gave 6.5 and 6.9 OL, respectively. The OL ratings of these target samples were relatively stable for the more familiar sample, T_CHN for Chinese and T_KOR for Koreans, when the consumers were exposed to different types of frames. For the less familiar sample, the liking score fluctuated depending on the type of flavor frame condition. This effect was more drastic among Koreans.
After calculating the FNS total score of consumers in each country and sorting the ranking, hey were divided into neophilics (Chinese: 10-27, Korean: 10-29 scores), neutrals (Chinese: 28-34, Korean: 30-38 scores), and neophobics (Chinese: 39-66, Korean: 35-64 scores) groups by country based on the 33rd and 66th percentiles. Compared to Koreans, Chinese consumers showed relatively lower level of food neophobia. Overall, the neophilics gave higher preference scores for samples than the neophobics group. Also, food neophobia affected differently depending on the degree of familiarity with the sample. The liking rating for familiar samples were similar between the neophobics and neophilics groups, but the liking rating for unfamiliar samples were significantly influenced by the degree of food neophobia. In addition, the food neophobia score was analyzed to be significantly influenced by the type of implicit frame exposed. Food neophobia was found to be more intense when exposed to implicit frame composed of flavors from other ethnic cultures among Chinese and Korean consumers. For testing new products, researchers should consider that the OL score can vary easily depending on the contextual conditions, especially, if the product is unfamiliar to consumers.