RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      대리인 문제 및 경영전략에 따른 판매관리비와 연구개발비의 비대칭적 원가행태 = (The) impacts of agency costs and business strategy on differential cost stickiness on felling and general administration costs and R&D expenses

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13553006

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The previous studies regarding cost stickiness consider the existence of fixed costs, future expected outlook of products, and managers’agency costs as determinants of the sticky behavior of certain costs categories. Especially they focused on how the selling and general administration costs(SGAC) behave as sales declines, using the above mentioned variables as drivers of cost stickiness. But the previous studies ignore how managers’agency costs and business strategies of firms may influence cost stickiness.
      Managers’opportunistic behavior can have different impacts on cost stickiness of certain expenses such as R&D and SGAC. For example, as agency costs of managers increase, the stickiness of SGAC increases because managers get personal utilities from SGAC. On the other hand, as agency costs of managers increase, the stickiness of R&D decreases because managers’annual or near term compensation gets higher as investment in R&D decreases.
      Therefore the purposes of this thesis are (a) first to investigate how SGAC and R&D expenses behave as managers’agency costs vary among firms and firms choose different business strategies and (b) next to explore whether or not the governance mechanisms of the firm can have any moderating effects on the cost stickiness patterns of those expenses. The hypotheses of this thesis can be summarized as follows:
      Firstly, we investigate whether or not agency costs can have any different effects on the stickiness behaviors of SGAC and R&D expenses. As sales decline, the stickiness of SGAC and R&D can be different because of agency problems. As sales decline, managers may have incentives to reduce SGAC less. However, managers may have incentives to reduce R&D expenses greatly as sales decline.
      Secondly, the strategy can determine the stickiness patterns of SGAC and R&D expenses. In this thesis we consider two generic strategies(cost leadership and product differentiation strategy) and empirically investigate how cost stickiness patterns of those two expenses differ as sales varies.
      Thirdly, various governance mechanisms can control managers’agency problems and thus can have significant impacts on the behavior of cost stickiness. We investigate how various governance mechanisms can have any moderating impacts on (a) the relationship between agency costs and cost stickiness of two types of expenses(SGAC and R&D) and (b) the relationship between business strategy and cost stickiness of two types of expenses(SGAC and R&D).
      To test empirically the above mentioned hypotheses, we gathered firm-year data of manufacturing firms from 1999 to 2012. The sample firms are listed on the Korean Stock Exchange. The total data points are 3,970. The results we found can be summarized as follows:
      Firstly, for those firms whose agency problems are high(above the median value of free cash flow used as a proxy of agency costs), the stickiness of SGAC increases but the stickiness of R&D decreases as sales decline. The results imply that in case of SGAC managers are not willing to reduce their perquisite consumption in proportion with sales reduction. On the other hand, in case of R&D managers have incentives to reduce R&D more. That is, the cost stickiness of R&D expenses rather decrease because reduction of R&D can increase their near-term monetary compensation.
      Secondly, for those firms that implement cost leadership strategy the stickiness of SGAC decreases and for those firms that implement product leadership strategy the stickiness of R&D increases. The results imply that for those firms that implement cost leadership strategy, it is very critical to value maximization to efficiently control SGAC and thus the stickiness of SGAC decreases as sales decline. On the other hand, for those firms that implement product leadership strategy, it is very critical to value maximization to maintain R&D as before to innovate and thus the stickiness of R&D increases as sales decline.
      Thirdly, we investigate how governance mechanisms influence the cost stickiness behaviors of SGAC and R&D for those firms whose agency costs are high(above the median value of free cash flow). The results are that as the effectiveness of governance mechanisms improves, (a) the cost stickiness of SGAC decreases and (b) the cost stickiness of R&D increases.
      Lastly, we explore what impacts, if any, governance mechanisms have on the relationship between business strategies and the cost stickiness patterns of SGAC and R&D expenses. The results are that (a) for those firms which implement cost leadership strategy the stickiness of SGAC decreases as some(not all) of the governance mechanisms improve and (b) for those firms which implement product leadership strategy the stickiness of R&D increases as some(not all) of the governance mechanism improve.
      The empirical evidence suggests that agency costs and business strategy have differential impacts on the cost stickiness of SGAC and R&D. And effective governance mechanisms moderate those differential cost stickiness behaviors of SGAC and R&D that agency costs and business strategy induce.
      번역하기

      The previous studies regarding cost stickiness consider the existence of fixed costs, future expected outlook of products, and managers’agency costs as determinants of the sticky behavior of certain costs categories. Especially they focused on how t...

      The previous studies regarding cost stickiness consider the existence of fixed costs, future expected outlook of products, and managers’agency costs as determinants of the sticky behavior of certain costs categories. Especially they focused on how the selling and general administration costs(SGAC) behave as sales declines, using the above mentioned variables as drivers of cost stickiness. But the previous studies ignore how managers’agency costs and business strategies of firms may influence cost stickiness.
      Managers’opportunistic behavior can have different impacts on cost stickiness of certain expenses such as R&D and SGAC. For example, as agency costs of managers increase, the stickiness of SGAC increases because managers get personal utilities from SGAC. On the other hand, as agency costs of managers increase, the stickiness of R&D decreases because managers’annual or near term compensation gets higher as investment in R&D decreases.
      Therefore the purposes of this thesis are (a) first to investigate how SGAC and R&D expenses behave as managers’agency costs vary among firms and firms choose different business strategies and (b) next to explore whether or not the governance mechanisms of the firm can have any moderating effects on the cost stickiness patterns of those expenses. The hypotheses of this thesis can be summarized as follows:
      Firstly, we investigate whether or not agency costs can have any different effects on the stickiness behaviors of SGAC and R&D expenses. As sales decline, the stickiness of SGAC and R&D can be different because of agency problems. As sales decline, managers may have incentives to reduce SGAC less. However, managers may have incentives to reduce R&D expenses greatly as sales decline.
      Secondly, the strategy can determine the stickiness patterns of SGAC and R&D expenses. In this thesis we consider two generic strategies(cost leadership and product differentiation strategy) and empirically investigate how cost stickiness patterns of those two expenses differ as sales varies.
      Thirdly, various governance mechanisms can control managers’agency problems and thus can have significant impacts on the behavior of cost stickiness. We investigate how various governance mechanisms can have any moderating impacts on (a) the relationship between agency costs and cost stickiness of two types of expenses(SGAC and R&D) and (b) the relationship between business strategy and cost stickiness of two types of expenses(SGAC and R&D).
      To test empirically the above mentioned hypotheses, we gathered firm-year data of manufacturing firms from 1999 to 2012. The sample firms are listed on the Korean Stock Exchange. The total data points are 3,970. The results we found can be summarized as follows:
      Firstly, for those firms whose agency problems are high(above the median value of free cash flow used as a proxy of agency costs), the stickiness of SGAC increases but the stickiness of R&D decreases as sales decline. The results imply that in case of SGAC managers are not willing to reduce their perquisite consumption in proportion with sales reduction. On the other hand, in case of R&D managers have incentives to reduce R&D more. That is, the cost stickiness of R&D expenses rather decrease because reduction of R&D can increase their near-term monetary compensation.
      Secondly, for those firms that implement cost leadership strategy the stickiness of SGAC decreases and for those firms that implement product leadership strategy the stickiness of R&D increases. The results imply that for those firms that implement cost leadership strategy, it is very critical to value maximization to efficiently control SGAC and thus the stickiness of SGAC decreases as sales decline. On the other hand, for those firms that implement product leadership strategy, it is very critical to value maximization to maintain R&D as before to innovate and thus the stickiness of R&D increases as sales decline.
      Thirdly, we investigate how governance mechanisms influence the cost stickiness behaviors of SGAC and R&D for those firms whose agency costs are high(above the median value of free cash flow). The results are that as the effectiveness of governance mechanisms improves, (a) the cost stickiness of SGAC decreases and (b) the cost stickiness of R&D increases.
      Lastly, we explore what impacts, if any, governance mechanisms have on the relationship between business strategies and the cost stickiness patterns of SGAC and R&D expenses. The results are that (a) for those firms which implement cost leadership strategy the stickiness of SGAC decreases as some(not all) of the governance mechanisms improve and (b) for those firms which implement product leadership strategy the stickiness of R&D increases as some(not all) of the governance mechanism improve.
      The empirical evidence suggests that agency costs and business strategy have differential impacts on the cost stickiness of SGAC and R&D. And effective governance mechanisms moderate those differential cost stickiness behaviors of SGAC and R&D that agency costs and business strategy induce.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제 1 장 서 론 1
      • 1.1 연구의 필요성 1
      • 1.2 연구의 목적 2
      • 1.3 연구방법 및 논문의 구성 3
      • 제 1 장 서 론 1
      • 1.1 연구의 필요성 1
      • 1.2 연구의 목적 2
      • 1.3 연구방법 및 논문의 구성 3
      • 제 2 장 이론적 배경 및 선행연구 5
      • 2.1 이론적 배경 5
      • 2.1.1 원가행태 5
      • 2.1.2 대리인 이론 8
      • 2.1.3 경영전략 11
      • 2.1.4 기업 지배구조 13
      • 2.2 선행연구 16
      • 2.2.1 비대칭적 원가행태에 관한 연구 16
      • 2.2.2 대리인 문제와 비대칭적 원가행태 26
      • 2.2.3 경영전략과 비대칭적 원가행태 28
      • 2.2.4 기업 지배구조와 비대칭적 원가행태 29
      • 2.2.5 관련 선행연구의 요약 및 평가 32
      • 제 3 장 연구설계 34
      • 3.1 연구가설의 설정 34
      • 3.1.1 기업의 대리인 문제와 비대칭적 원가행태 34
      • 3.1.2 기업의 경영전략과 비대칭적 원가행태 37
      • 3.1.3 대리인 문제의 크기, 기업 지배구조와 비대칭적 원가행태 39
      • 3.1.4 경영전략 및 기업 지배구조와 비대칭적 원가행태 41
      • 3.2 연구모형의 설계 42
      • 3.2.1 판매관리비와 연구개발비의 하방경직성 기본모형 43
      • 3.2.2 판매관리비와 연구개발비의 하방경직성 추가모형 44
      • 3.2.3 대리인 문제의 크기에 따른 판매관리비와
      • 연구개발비의 하방경직성 분석모형 46
      • 3.2.4 경영전략에 따른 판매관리비와 연구개발비의
      • 하방경직성 분석모형 48
      • 3.2.5 판매관리비와 연구개발비의 하방경직성에 영향을
      • 미치는 기업 지배구조의 조절효과 분석모형 49
      • 3.3 변수의 조작적 정의 51
      • 3.3.1 종속변수 52
      • 3.3.2 설명변수 53
      • 3.4 표본선정 및 자료수집 60
      • 제 4 장 실증분석 64
      • 4.1 기술통계량 64
      • 4.2 상관관계분석 67
      • 4.3 판매관리비와 연구개발비의 하방경직성 분석결과 69
      • 4.3.1 기본모형 분석결과 69
      • 4.3.2 추가모형 분석결과 71
      • 4.3.3 대리인 문제의 크기에 따른 판매관리비와 연구개발비의
      • 하방경직성 분석결과 75
      • 4.3.4 경영전략에 따른 판매관리비와 연구개발비의
      • 하방경직성 분석결과 79
      • 4.3.5 대리인 문제의 크기에 따른 기업 지배구조의
      • 조절효과 분석결과 83
      • 4.3.6 경영전략에 따른 기업 지배구조의 조절효과 분석결과 88
      • 4.4 분석결과의 요약 91
      • 제 5 장 결 론 93
      • 5.1 연구결과의 요약 93
      • 5.2 연구의 의의 및 한계점, 미래연구방향 94
      • 참 고 문 헌 97
      • Abstract 103
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼