RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    문제중심학습에서 튜터의 인지적 역할유형에 따른 발문제공이 문제해결과 만족도에 미치는 효과 = Effects of Types of Questions According to PBL Tutor`s Cognitive Roles on the Problem Solving and Satisfaction

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959483

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There is a growing emphasis on the tutors` cognitive roles that guide students` difficulties in the process of problem solving in problem-based learning environments. Despite the importance of tutors` roles, little research has been conducted to examine what roles tutor should provide and what questions should be employed to facilitate students learning. Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine the effects of tutors questions according to the types of cognitive roles(elaboration stimulator, learning process monitor, knowledge integration facilitator) on problem solving achievements and learners` satisfaction. Participants were 60 adult learners who enrolled in a word office program that were designed based on a problem-based learning approach at a community center located at Ansan city, Gyeonggi province, in Korea. The results show that students who received questioning that stimulate elaboration showed significantly high scores than those in other groups at the stage of problem representation(F(2,19)=22.31, p < .01). Students who received questionings that stimulate knowledge integration showed significantly high scores than those in other groups at the stage of solution development(F(2,19)=12.58, p < .01). In addition, students who received questionings that stimulate knowledge integration showed significantly high scores on satisfaction survey than those in other groups at the stage of solution development(F(2,19)=10.77, p < .01).
    번역하기

    There is a growing emphasis on the tutors` cognitive roles that guide students` difficulties in the process of problem solving in problem-based learning environments. Despite the importance of tutors` roles, little research has been conducted to exami...

    There is a growing emphasis on the tutors` cognitive roles that guide students` difficulties in the process of problem solving in problem-based learning environments. Despite the importance of tutors` roles, little research has been conducted to examine what roles tutor should provide and what questions should be employed to facilitate students learning. Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine the effects of tutors questions according to the types of cognitive roles(elaboration stimulator, learning process monitor, knowledge integration facilitator) on problem solving achievements and learners` satisfaction. Participants were 60 adult learners who enrolled in a word office program that were designed based on a problem-based learning approach at a community center located at Ansan city, Gyeonggi province, in Korea. The results show that students who received questioning that stimulate elaboration showed significantly high scores than those in other groups at the stage of problem representation(F(2,19)=22.31, p < .01). Students who received questionings that stimulate knowledge integration showed significantly high scores than those in other groups at the stage of solution development(F(2,19)=12.58, p < .01). In addition, students who received questionings that stimulate knowledge integration showed significantly high scores on satisfaction survey than those in other groups at the stage of solution development(F(2,19)=10.77, p < .01).

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 숙명여자대학교 교수학습센터, 숙명여자대학교 2008

    2 박은경, "의학교육에서의 문제중심학습에서 튜터의 역할에 관한 평가 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2003

    3 강명희, "의학 PBL(Problem-Based Learning)에서 학습자가 평가한 튜터의 역할이 상호작용 및 학습결과에 미치는 영향" 교육과학연구소 39 (39): 1-25, 2008

    4 장정아, "웹기반 PBL에서 튜터의 역할수행에 대한 사례연구" 한국교육공학회 21 (21): 97-129, 2005

    5 박병학, "사랑의 수업론" 교육과학사 1996

    6 조연순, "문제중심학습의 이론과 실제" 학지사 2006

    7 김주연, "문제중심학습 환경에서 정보문해능력과 학습태도가 학업성취에 미치는 영향" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2002

    8 송해덕, "문제중심학습 환경에서 성찰적사고 지원요인 탐색" 한국열린교육학회 17 (17): 215-232, 2009

    9 송해덕, "멀티미디어 기반 문제중심학습 환경에서 스캐폴딩 설계원리 탐색" 한국열린교육학회 18 (18): 149-164, 2010

    10 Schmidt, H., "What makes a tutor effective? A structural equations modeling approach to learning in problem-based learning curricula" 70 : 708-714, 1995

    1 숙명여자대학교 교수학습센터, 숙명여자대학교 2008

    2 박은경, "의학교육에서의 문제중심학습에서 튜터의 역할에 관한 평가 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2003

    3 강명희, "의학 PBL(Problem-Based Learning)에서 학습자가 평가한 튜터의 역할이 상호작용 및 학습결과에 미치는 영향" 교육과학연구소 39 (39): 1-25, 2008

    4 장정아, "웹기반 PBL에서 튜터의 역할수행에 대한 사례연구" 한국교육공학회 21 (21): 97-129, 2005

    5 박병학, "사랑의 수업론" 교육과학사 1996

    6 조연순, "문제중심학습의 이론과 실제" 학지사 2006

    7 김주연, "문제중심학습 환경에서 정보문해능력과 학습태도가 학업성취에 미치는 영향" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2002

    8 송해덕, "문제중심학습 환경에서 성찰적사고 지원요인 탐색" 한국열린교육학회 17 (17): 215-232, 2009

    9 송해덕, "멀티미디어 기반 문제중심학습 환경에서 스캐폴딩 설계원리 탐색" 한국열린교육학회 18 (18): 149-164, 2010

    10 Schmidt, H., "What makes a tutor effective? A structural equations modeling approach to learning in problem-based learning curricula" 70 : 708-714, 1995

    11 Markert, R. J., "What makes a good teacher? Lessons from teaching medical students" 76 (76): 809-810, 2001

    12 Dolmans, D., "Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: Conclusions and implications for educational practice and research" 24 (24): 173-180, 2002

    13 Barrows, H. S., "The tutorial process" Southern Illinois University School of Medicine 1992

    14 Neville, A. J., "The problem-based learning tutor: Teacher? Facilitator" 21 (21): 393-401, 1999

    15 Duch, B. J., "The power of problem-based learning" Stylus Publishing, LLC 2001

    16 Uden, L., "Technology and problem-based learning" Information Science Publishing 2006

    17 Mayo, P., "Student perceptions of tutor effectiveness in problem-based surgery clerkship" 4 : 227-233, 1993

    18 Ge, X., "Scaffolding students’ problem-Solving processes on an ill-Structured task using question prompts and peer interactions" Pennsylvania State University 2001

    19 Grave, W. S., "Profiles of effective tutors in problem-based learning: Scaffolding student learning" 33 : 901-906, 1999

    20 Torp, L., "Problems as Possibilities: Problem-Based Learning for K-16 Education(2nd Ed)" Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) 2002

    21 Dolmans, D. H., "Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research" 39 : 732-741, 2005

    22 Hmelo-Silver, C. E., "Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn" 16 (16): 235-246, 2004

    23 Evensen, D. H., "Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc 2000

    24 Prpic, K., "Problem solving objectives of problem-based learning"

    25 Barrows, H. S., "Practice-based learning: Problem-based learning applied to medical education" Southern Illinois University School of Medicine 1994

    26 Uden, L., "Lifelong learning for software engineers" 14 (14): 101-110, 2004

    27 Jonassen, D. H., "Learning to solve problems with technoligy: A constructivist perspective" Pearson Education Inc 2003

    28 Delisle, R., "How to use problem-based learning in the classroom" Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 1997

    29 Dolmans, D. H., "A rating scale for tutor evaluation in a problem-based curriculum: Validity and reliability" 28 : 550-558, 1994

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼