RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      시각되먹임 균형훈련이 편측무시와 감각이상이 있는 뇌졸중 환자의 균형에 미치는 영향 = Effect of Visual Feedback Training on Standing-Balance in Stroke with Neglect and/or Sensory Deficit

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10998297

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The researches that concerned with visual feedback training was often used for treatment on symmetrical weight-bearing training in stroke patients. Although there were many researches for the effects of visual feedback training in stroke, it was not identify that effects of visual feedback training in stroke following pure motor, sensory deficit and neglect.
      The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of visual feedback training on standing balance in stroke with neglect and/or sensory deficit.
      Subjects were assigned to pure stroke group, sensory deficit group and neglect group. In all groups, assessed for standing balance(weight-bearing symmetry on quiet standing, maximal voluntary weight bearing on affected/unaffected, limit of stability and training time of program ), balance performance(short form of Berg balance scale) and measured the EMG on lower extremity muscle for lateral stability(gluteus medius, hip adductors, medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius and peroneal muscles) before training.
      Subjects underwent the visual feedback training for three times per week and tested the standing balance once in two weeks during 10weeks. After training, retested the standing balance, balance performance and EMG.
      The results of this study were as follows:
      1. In all groups, there were statistically significant improvement in weight bearing on quiet standing, maximal voluntary weight shifting volume on unaffected side and totally, and program training times following visual feedback training during 10 weeks.
      2. There were a statistically significant difference between groups in weight bearing on quiet standing, maximal voluntary weight shifting volume on affected side, maximal voluntary weight shifting volume on both side totally, and program training times following visual feedback training during 10 weeks.
      3. There were statistically significant correlations among the affected side maximal voluntary limit of stability and weight bearing at least during 6weeks following visual feedback training in all groups, and sensory deficit and neglect group were statistically significant correlations during 10weeks.
      4. In all groups, there were no significant correlations among the unaffected side maximal voluntary limit of stability and weight bearing during 10weeks.
      5. In pure motor and sensory deficit groups, there were statistically significant improvement between pre and post training in SFBBS scores following visual feedback training.
      6. In all groups, there were statistically significant improvement between pre and post training in muscle activation of affected side gluteus medius, medial and lateral gastrocnemius and peroneal muscles when weight transfer on affected side.
      7. In all groups, there were statistically significant improvement between pre and post training in muscle activation of unaffected side lateral gastrocnemius and peroneal muscles when weight transfer on unaffected side.
      In conclusion, although pure motor stroke group was more improve than neglect and/or sensory deficit groups through the visual feedback training, neglect and/or sensory deficit groups also could effect improvement. Therefore, visual feedback training was worth stroke whose included neglect and/or sensory deficit while to improve standing balance.
      번역하기

      The researches that concerned with visual feedback training was often used for treatment on symmetrical weight-bearing training in stroke patients. Although there were many researches for the effects of visual feedback training in stroke, it was not i...

      The researches that concerned with visual feedback training was often used for treatment on symmetrical weight-bearing training in stroke patients. Although there were many researches for the effects of visual feedback training in stroke, it was not identify that effects of visual feedback training in stroke following pure motor, sensory deficit and neglect.
      The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of visual feedback training on standing balance in stroke with neglect and/or sensory deficit.
      Subjects were assigned to pure stroke group, sensory deficit group and neglect group. In all groups, assessed for standing balance(weight-bearing symmetry on quiet standing, maximal voluntary weight bearing on affected/unaffected, limit of stability and training time of program ), balance performance(short form of Berg balance scale) and measured the EMG on lower extremity muscle for lateral stability(gluteus medius, hip adductors, medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius and peroneal muscles) before training.
      Subjects underwent the visual feedback training for three times per week and tested the standing balance once in two weeks during 10weeks. After training, retested the standing balance, balance performance and EMG.
      The results of this study were as follows:
      1. In all groups, there were statistically significant improvement in weight bearing on quiet standing, maximal voluntary weight shifting volume on unaffected side and totally, and program training times following visual feedback training during 10 weeks.
      2. There were a statistically significant difference between groups in weight bearing on quiet standing, maximal voluntary weight shifting volume on affected side, maximal voluntary weight shifting volume on both side totally, and program training times following visual feedback training during 10 weeks.
      3. There were statistically significant correlations among the affected side maximal voluntary limit of stability and weight bearing at least during 6weeks following visual feedback training in all groups, and sensory deficit and neglect group were statistically significant correlations during 10weeks.
      4. In all groups, there were no significant correlations among the unaffected side maximal voluntary limit of stability and weight bearing during 10weeks.
      5. In pure motor and sensory deficit groups, there were statistically significant improvement between pre and post training in SFBBS scores following visual feedback training.
      6. In all groups, there were statistically significant improvement between pre and post training in muscle activation of affected side gluteus medius, medial and lateral gastrocnemius and peroneal muscles when weight transfer on affected side.
      7. In all groups, there were statistically significant improvement between pre and post training in muscle activation of unaffected side lateral gastrocnemius and peroneal muscles when weight transfer on unaffected side.
      In conclusion, although pure motor stroke group was more improve than neglect and/or sensory deficit groups through the visual feedback training, neglect and/or sensory deficit groups also could effect improvement. Therefore, visual feedback training was worth stroke whose included neglect and/or sensory deficit while to improve standing balance.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 배경 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 = 3
      • 3. 연구의 가설 = 4
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 배경 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 = 3
      • 3. 연구의 가설 = 4
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
      • 1. 선 자세에서의 자세조절과 뇌졸중 환자의 균형 = 5
      • 2. 체성감각과 뇌졸중 환자의 체상감각 이상 = 7
      • 3. 자세 조절에서의 시각 입력 = 9
      • 4. 뇌졸중 환자의 편측 무시와 치료적 접근법 = 10
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 = 13
      • 1. 연구대상 = 13
      • 2. 연구기간 = 13
      • 3. 연구 설계 = 14
      • 4. 연구도구 및 측정방법 = 16
      • 1) 편측 무시 검사 = 16
      • 2) 감각 이상 검사 = 18
      • 3) 균형 능력 검사 = 18
      • 4) 근전도 측정 = 23
      • 5) 균형 훈련 방법 = 24
      • 5. 자료 처리 = 26
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 = 27
      • 1. 연구대상자의 일반적 특성 = 27
      • 2. 균형훈련 전 그룹 간 차이에 대한 통계학적 비교분석 = 29
      • 1) 균형훈련 전 정적 선 자세에서 마비측 체중지지율에 따른 분산분석 = 29
      • 2) 세 그룹 간 차이에 대한 사후검정 = 29
      • 3. 시각되먹임 균형훈련이 뇌졸중 환자의 좌우체중지지에 미치는 영향 = 31
      • 1) 균형훈련기간에 따른 정적 선 자세에서의 마비측 체중지지율 비교 = 31
      • 2) 균형훈련 기간에 따른 정적 선 자세에서 마비측으로의 최대 자발적 체중 이동량 비교 = 37
      • 3) 균형훈련 기간에 따른 정적 선 자세에서 비마비측으로의 최대 자발적 체중 이동량 비교 = 44
      • 4) 균형훈련 기간에 따른 좌우 최대 자발적 체중 이동량 비교 = 50
      • 4. 시각되먹임 균형훈련 프로그램 수행 소요시간의 비교 = 56
      • 1) 균형훈련 기간에 따른 그룹 내 프로그램 수행 소요시간 비교 = 56
      • 2) 균형훈련 기간에 따른 그룹 간 프로그램 수행 소요시간 비교 = 60
      • 5. 시각되먹임 균형훈련에 따른 좌우의 체중지지 정도와 안정성 한계(최대이동거리)와의 상관관계 = 62
      • 1) 균형훈련에 따른 각 그룹 간 마비측으로의 최대 자발적 체중지지 정도와 마비측 안정성한계(최대이동거리)와의 상관관계 = 62
      • 2) 균형훈련에 따른 각 그룹별 비마비측으로의 최대 자발적 체중지지 정도와 비마비측 안정성한계(최대이동거리)와의 상관관계 = 65
      • 6. 시각되먹임 균형훈련에 따른 각 그룹 간 SFBBS 점수의 변화 = 68
      • 1) 균형훈련에 따른 각 그룹 내 SFBBS 점수의 전후 비교 = 68
      • 2) 균형훈련에 따른 각 그룹 간 SFBBS 점수 변화의 공분산 분석 = 70
      • 7. 시각되먹임 균형훈련에 따른 근 활성도의 변화 = 72
      • 1) 균형훈련에 따른 마비측으로의 최대 자발적 체중 이동시 근 활성도 비교 = 72
      • 2) 균형훈련에 따른 비마비측으로의 최대 자발적 체중 이동시 근 활성도 비교 = 84
      • Ⅴ. 고찰 = 95
      • Ⅵ. 결론 = 101
      • 참고문헌 = 103
      • Astract = 109
      • 부록 = 111
      • 부록Ⅰ. Brunel balance assessment(BBA) = 112
      • 부록Ⅱ. Short form of the Berg balance scale(SFBBS) = 113
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼