RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      생태현장교육이 중학생의 생명존중 태도변화에 미치는 영향

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11003984

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In contemporary education, an excessive competitive sense, school violence are increasing because of absence of humanity education. Also, the rate of juvenile suicide is increasing which is originated from loss of identity. It is needed to convert the education for juveniles who will live in the future into new paradigm. The future education should foster a knowledge of ecosystem by eco-friendly way. It will grow the level of understanding and attitude of respect towards the life at the same time. Also, it will teach how human and nature live together in whole ecosystem.
      On basis of the judgement above, I have researched and analyzed how much effect the ecology field education on the change of eco-respect attitude of secondary school student's.
      To achieve the aim, I established three subjects which are same as blow;
      Fisrt, Can the ecology field education make students have friendly attitude towards nature by affecting their original information and perception.
      Second, Can the ecology field education make student realize the value of nature and have eco-respect attitude? Furthermore can it make students realize the value of human life?
      Third, Can the ecology field education induce student's substantial acts for eco protection and eco-respection?
      I have divided secondary school students into comparison group and experimental group. Questionnaire is used in this research, which consists of 20 questions;
      1) Information and perception : 5 Questions.
      2) Value and attitude : 10 Questions.
      3) Behave and participation : 5 Questions.
      Comparison group does not got ecology field education and experimental group got ecology field education from specialist. I operated questionnaire before and after ecology field education and compared. I used SPSS 12.0 for Windows to analyze the result. I practiced One way - ANOVA to test whether it is significant or not. P-value is 0.05.
      To make conclusion, the living knowledge from ecology field education increase the information and perception of value of eco system compared to indoor monolithic education. Also, it makes students to know how to keep good relationship between human and eco system, to make eco-respect attitude, to exert ti protection rather than development, to participate and act voluntarily for eco protection. Finally it affects the attitude of students towards life.
      번역하기

      In contemporary education, an excessive competitive sense, school violence are increasing because of absence of humanity education. Also, the rate of juvenile suicide is increasing which is originated from loss of identity. It is needed to convert the...

      In contemporary education, an excessive competitive sense, school violence are increasing because of absence of humanity education. Also, the rate of juvenile suicide is increasing which is originated from loss of identity. It is needed to convert the education for juveniles who will live in the future into new paradigm. The future education should foster a knowledge of ecosystem by eco-friendly way. It will grow the level of understanding and attitude of respect towards the life at the same time. Also, it will teach how human and nature live together in whole ecosystem.
      On basis of the judgement above, I have researched and analyzed how much effect the ecology field education on the change of eco-respect attitude of secondary school student's.
      To achieve the aim, I established three subjects which are same as blow;
      Fisrt, Can the ecology field education make students have friendly attitude towards nature by affecting their original information and perception.
      Second, Can the ecology field education make student realize the value of nature and have eco-respect attitude? Furthermore can it make students realize the value of human life?
      Third, Can the ecology field education induce student's substantial acts for eco protection and eco-respection?
      I have divided secondary school students into comparison group and experimental group. Questionnaire is used in this research, which consists of 20 questions;
      1) Information and perception : 5 Questions.
      2) Value and attitude : 10 Questions.
      3) Behave and participation : 5 Questions.
      Comparison group does not got ecology field education and experimental group got ecology field education from specialist. I operated questionnaire before and after ecology field education and compared. I used SPSS 12.0 for Windows to analyze the result. I practiced One way - ANOVA to test whether it is significant or not. P-value is 0.05.
      To make conclusion, the living knowledge from ecology field education increase the information and perception of value of eco system compared to indoor monolithic education. Also, it makes students to know how to keep good relationship between human and eco system, to make eco-respect attitude, to exert ti protection rather than development, to participate and act voluntarily for eco protection. Finally it affects the attitude of students towards life.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • Ⅱ. 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 3
      • 1. 생태현장교육의 특성 및 중요성 = 3
      • 2. 생태현장교육의 현황 = 5
      • 3. 용어의 정의 = 7
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • Ⅱ. 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 3
      • 1. 생태현장교육의 특성 및 중요성 = 3
      • 2. 생태현장교육의 현황 = 5
      • 3. 용어의 정의 = 7
      • 4. 선행연구의 분석 = 9
      • 5. 연구의 목적 = 10
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 및 연구과정 = 11
      • 1. 연구문제 = 11
      • 2. 연구 대상 = 12
      • 3. 연구 설계 = 13
      • 4. 연구 과정 = 14
      • 5. 연구의 제한점 = 19
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 및 고찰 = 20
      • 1. 사전 검사 결과 = 20
      • 2. 사후 검사 결과 = 22
      • 3. 고찰 = 30
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 34
      • Ⅵ. 참고문헌 = 37
      • ABSTRACT = 40
      • 부록 = 42
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼