Social welfare analysis of the net neutrality policy : Allocation for mVoIP service Shin, sun Department of Economics Graduate School Hankuk University of Foreigh Studies Current South Korea, Tele-Communication Firms except for LG Telecom pa...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13109733
서울 : 韓國外國語大學校 大學院, 2013
학위논문(석사) -- 韓國外國語大學校 大學院 , 경제학과 , 2013. 2
2013
한국어
330 판사항(22)
서울
Social welfare analysis of the net neutrality policy : allocation for mVoIP service
40 p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm.
한국외국어대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
지도교수: 정인석
참고문헌 : p. 38-39
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Social welfare analysis of the net neutrality policy : Allocation for mVoIP service Shin, sun Department of Economics Graduate School Hankuk University of Foreigh Studies Current South Korea, Tele-Communication Firms except for LG Telecom pa...
Social welfare analysis of the net neutrality policy : Allocation for mVoIP service
Shin, sun
Department of Economics
Graduate School
Hankuk University of Foreigh Studies
Current South Korea, Tele-Communication Firms except for LG Telecom partially blocked mVoIP service depending a flat-rate payment system. The mVoIP service provider harms profit of Tele-Communication Firms but increases user's utility.
In mVoIP market, I discuss the social welfare effect of zero-price rule and non-discrimination rule in platform monopoly market.
This paper analyzed three policies used Hotelling model. The first policy is represented by an ideal net neutrality that follows zero-price rule and non-discrimination rule. The second policy is represented by an current market follows zero-price rule. The last policy is that keeps non-discrimination rule and permit the termination fee that guaranteed the profit of the present tele-communication firm.
The result of this paper, non-discrimination rule is always enhancing social welfare. Even if our condition for non discrimination rule increase total surplus is satisfied, consumer welfare is not connected to total surplus. It means the model could not suggest the solution which is satisfied the increase of consumer surplus and social welfare if the current level of firm's profit support investment of net neutrality.
목차 (Table of Contents)