RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고려전기 왕실 출신 승려들의 출가와 활동 = The Royal family members entering Buddhist priesthood, and their activities as Buddhist priests, in the early half period of Goryeo

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      family members who left the palace, entered (Buddhist) priesthood, acted as members of the Buddhist community, until their very death. Also examined here, are how the government managed them, and continued this kind of practice(letting Royal family members entering priesthood).
      These (Buddhist) priests from the Royal family entered priesthood at the order of the King. And they went through necessary rituals before leaving the palace. With the support of the King, they studied under Royal or National priests, and also under priests renowned for their deeds, studies and integrity. Right after their entrance into priesthood they received Gujok-gyae, and was automatically exempted from having to apply for the priesthood examination.
      Priests who were formerly (and still) princes inside the Royal family received high designations such as ‘Seungtong’ or ‘Dae-Seonsa’. On the other hand, sons of Royal concubines('Sogun') received relatively lower designations, yet in cases of taking the priesthood examination they could be named to either Seungtong or Dae-Seonsa as well. ‘Prince-priests' were usually named as head priests for large, famous and powerful Buddhist temples, and in many cases they served as head priests for not one but several temples at the same time. And these priests from the Royal family generally never served as head priests for temples located in the ‘local areas’(they did so only in special cases like having to escape political turmoils). Whenever a priest who was part of the Royal family died, the King provided special treatments, and more so when the deceased was one was a prince. In such occasion, the King would change into a mourning attire, skip the morning conferences, and honor the one with the (posthumous) title of a National priest.
      Although there were slight differences between the status granted to priests who were originally princes and the status granted to priests who were originally a royal concubine’s son, in general, priests from the Royal family were granted with special favors and privileges compared to other ordinary priests. The Kings provided them with all these privileges under the intention of having them obtain higher positions inside the Buddhist community, and also Buddhist order through them. Plus, the noble deed of abandoning a prestigious position as a prince, and taking the humble and difficult path to seek for 'the truth', served as a significantly strong demonstration of the fact that the King and the Royal family were actively practicing the teachings of Budda themselves, which could only be helpful in capturing the hearts and approval of the public.
      The priests from the Royal family were allowed to freely enter and exit the palace. And they were perceived as dignitaries, and recognized as an entity having an extensive relationship with the King, like the King’s son(皇子), or the King’s brother(大弟). And like Euicheon, who suggested that a policy of casting coins for national usage be established(‘鑄錢論’), they served as counselors and aides for the King and the Royal family as well, providing counsels regarding dynastic policies.
      번역하기

      family members who left the palace, entered (Buddhist) priesthood, acted as members of the Buddhist community, until their very death. Also examined here, are how the government managed them, and continued this kind of practice(letting Royal family me...

      family members who left the palace, entered (Buddhist) priesthood, acted as members of the Buddhist community, until their very death. Also examined here, are how the government managed them, and continued this kind of practice(letting Royal family members entering priesthood).
      These (Buddhist) priests from the Royal family entered priesthood at the order of the King. And they went through necessary rituals before leaving the palace. With the support of the King, they studied under Royal or National priests, and also under priests renowned for their deeds, studies and integrity. Right after their entrance into priesthood they received Gujok-gyae, and was automatically exempted from having to apply for the priesthood examination.
      Priests who were formerly (and still) princes inside the Royal family received high designations such as ‘Seungtong’ or ‘Dae-Seonsa’. On the other hand, sons of Royal concubines('Sogun') received relatively lower designations, yet in cases of taking the priesthood examination they could be named to either Seungtong or Dae-Seonsa as well. ‘Prince-priests' were usually named as head priests for large, famous and powerful Buddhist temples, and in many cases they served as head priests for not one but several temples at the same time. And these priests from the Royal family generally never served as head priests for temples located in the ‘local areas’(they did so only in special cases like having to escape political turmoils). Whenever a priest who was part of the Royal family died, the King provided special treatments, and more so when the deceased was one was a prince. In such occasion, the King would change into a mourning attire, skip the morning conferences, and honor the one with the (posthumous) title of a National priest.
      Although there were slight differences between the status granted to priests who were originally princes and the status granted to priests who were originally a royal concubine’s son, in general, priests from the Royal family were granted with special favors and privileges compared to other ordinary priests. The Kings provided them with all these privileges under the intention of having them obtain higher positions inside the Buddhist community, and also Buddhist order through them. Plus, the noble deed of abandoning a prestigious position as a prince, and taking the humble and difficult path to seek for 'the truth', served as a significantly strong demonstration of the fact that the King and the Royal family were actively practicing the teachings of Budda themselves, which could only be helpful in capturing the hearts and approval of the public.
      The priests from the Royal family were allowed to freely enter and exit the palace. And they were perceived as dignitaries, and recognized as an entity having an extensive relationship with the King, like the King’s son(皇子), or the King’s brother(大弟). And like Euicheon, who suggested that a policy of casting coins for national usage be established(‘鑄錢論’), they served as counselors and aides for the King and the Royal family as well, providing counsels regarding dynastic policies.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 머리말
      • 1. 출가
      • 2. 활동
      • 3. 입적
      • 맺음말
      • 머리말
      • 1. 출가
      • 2. 활동
      • 3. 입적
      • 맺음말
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 李仁在, "金富軾과 朴浩·林存의 義天 評價" 역사교육연구회 (99) : 95-133, 2006

      2 세계성전간행협회, "망월불교대사전" 2488-, 1974

      3 김용선, "고려금석문연구 - 돌에 새겨진 사회사" 일조각 329-331, 2004

      4 김용선, "고려금석문연구" 일조각 2004

      5 김용선, "고려 승려의 일대기" 한림대 인문학연구소 7 : 2000

      6 金龍善, "高麗蔭敍制度硏究" 一潮閣 137-141, 1991

      7 이정란, "高麗時代의 小君과 國庶" 한국사연구회 (122) : 3-96, 2003

      8 許興植, "高麗時代의 國師·王師制度와 그 機能 in: 高麗佛敎史硏究" 一潮閣에 1986

      9 박윤진, "高麗時代 승려의 血族間 師承과 그 意味" 한국사연구회 (142) : 69-103, 2008

      10 朴胤珍, "高麗時代 王師․國師 硏究" 景仁文化社 2006

      1 李仁在, "金富軾과 朴浩·林存의 義天 評價" 역사교육연구회 (99) : 95-133, 2006

      2 세계성전간행협회, "망월불교대사전" 2488-, 1974

      3 김용선, "고려금석문연구 - 돌에 새겨진 사회사" 일조각 329-331, 2004

      4 김용선, "고려금석문연구" 일조각 2004

      5 김용선, "고려 승려의 일대기" 한림대 인문학연구소 7 : 2000

      6 金龍善, "高麗蔭敍制度硏究" 一潮閣 137-141, 1991

      7 이정란, "高麗時代의 小君과 國庶" 한국사연구회 (122) : 3-96, 2003

      8 許興植, "高麗時代의 國師·王師制度와 그 機能 in: 高麗佛敎史硏究" 一潮閣에 1986

      9 박윤진, "高麗時代 승려의 血族間 師承과 그 意味" 한국사연구회 (142) : 69-103, 2008

      10 朴胤珍, "高麗時代 王師․國師 硏究" 景仁文化社 2006

      11 李貞蘭, "高麗時代 庶孼 연구" 고려대학교 2003

      12 韓基汶, "高麗寺院의 構造와 機能" 民族社 1998

      13 "高麗史節要 권13, 명종 22년 10월"

      14 "高麗史"

      15 이정란, "高麗前期 庶孼의 身分規定에 관한 一考察" 7 : 2001

      16 韓基汶, "高麗中期 興王寺의 創建과 華嚴宗團" 5 : 1990

      17 許興植, "韓國金石全文(中世上)" 亞細亞文化社 1984

      18 權相老, "韓國寺刹全書(上)" 동국대출판부 1979

      19 "東國李相國集 권35, 비명·묘지, 曹溪山第二世故斷俗寺住持修禪社主贈謚眞覺國師碑銘"

      20 許興植, "擇窩許善道先生停年紀念 韓國史學論叢 in: 고려의 문화전통과 사회사상" 집문당 1992

      21 "宋史 권29, 高麗傳"

      22 崔柄憲, "天台宗의 성립 in: 한국사 6" 국사편찬위원회 85-, 1973

      23 "大覺國師文集 권12, 鑄錢建議上疏"

      24 "三國遺事 권4, 義解5, 心地繼祖"

      25 최연식, "‘大覺國師碑’ 建立過程에 대한 새로운 고찰" 83 : 1993

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼