RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      ‘사회과탐구’에 대한 의미 형성과정과 유형 탐색

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105105151

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to investigate how elementary pre-service teachers inquiry and inquiry instruction change and develop by examining inquiry and inquiry instruction as they understand based on teachers educational experience. The current study explored and categorized the meanings of inquiry shown in pre-service teachers inquiry theory, guidance plan preparation, and experience in teaching practice and the results are as follows: First, the meanings of inquiry pre-service teachers built up based on theory were identified as three types including a type of stressing ‘expression of inquiry’, a type of stressing ‘process of inquiry’, and a type of stressing ‘results obtained from inquiry’. Second, pre-service teachers expand the meanings of inquiry into four types including a type of pursuing relationships, a type of pursuing knowledge, a type of pursuing empathy, and a type of pursuing motivation by designing inquiry class plans. This means that the meanings of inquiry become sophisticated according to the teaching context a teacher need to consider in the relationship between inquiry and instruction. Third, pre-service teachers understand inquiry on more detailed and strategic level than before performing instruction through teaching practice. At this time, a function pursuing type and a social participation type were added to inquiry types along with a relationship-oriented type, an empathy-oriented type, a knowledge-expanding type, and an interest-lasting type. It is practical knowledge pre-service teachers produced through a reflective process of fully considering the practice of teaching. Through this study, inquiry of pre-service teachers changed from ‘theory-centered abstract inquiry’ before teaching practice into ‘practical and concrete inquiry’ to consider main agents of teaching and teaching situations after teaching practice. Preliminary teachers do understand inquiry class not by clarifying the attributes of inquiry, but by constantly generating the new meanings of inquiry suitable for actual teaching situations. Therefore, the teacher education institute need to develop practice-centered teaching models in addition to trying to encourage and acknowledge the meanings of inquiry generated diversely in teaching practice as well as theoretical exploration of the existing inquiry learning models.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to investigate how elementary pre-service teachers inquiry and inquiry instruction change and develop by examining inquiry and inquiry instruction as they understand based on teachers educational experience. The current ...

      The purpose of this study is to investigate how elementary pre-service teachers inquiry and inquiry instruction change and develop by examining inquiry and inquiry instruction as they understand based on teachers educational experience. The current study explored and categorized the meanings of inquiry shown in pre-service teachers inquiry theory, guidance plan preparation, and experience in teaching practice and the results are as follows: First, the meanings of inquiry pre-service teachers built up based on theory were identified as three types including a type of stressing ‘expression of inquiry’, a type of stressing ‘process of inquiry’, and a type of stressing ‘results obtained from inquiry’. Second, pre-service teachers expand the meanings of inquiry into four types including a type of pursuing relationships, a type of pursuing knowledge, a type of pursuing empathy, and a type of pursuing motivation by designing inquiry class plans. This means that the meanings of inquiry become sophisticated according to the teaching context a teacher need to consider in the relationship between inquiry and instruction. Third, pre-service teachers understand inquiry on more detailed and strategic level than before performing instruction through teaching practice. At this time, a function pursuing type and a social participation type were added to inquiry types along with a relationship-oriented type, an empathy-oriented type, a knowledge-expanding type, and an interest-lasting type. It is practical knowledge pre-service teachers produced through a reflective process of fully considering the practice of teaching. Through this study, inquiry of pre-service teachers changed from ‘theory-centered abstract inquiry’ before teaching practice into ‘practical and concrete inquiry’ to consider main agents of teaching and teaching situations after teaching practice. Preliminary teachers do understand inquiry class not by clarifying the attributes of inquiry, but by constantly generating the new meanings of inquiry suitable for actual teaching situations. Therefore, the teacher education institute need to develop practice-centered teaching models in addition to trying to encourage and acknowledge the meanings of inquiry generated diversely in teaching practice as well as theoretical exploration of the existing inquiry learning models.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 권오정, "한국 사회과수업의 구성논리와 개혁운동의 한계. 달라져야 할 사회과교육" 교학사 1991

      2 Dewey, J., "하우 위 싱크 과학적 사고의 방법과 교육" 학이시습 2011

      3 홍미화, "초등교사의 사회과 교실 수업 구성에 대한 연구" 한국사회교과교육학회 19 (19): 83-97, 2012

      4 정길용, "제3차 교육과정기 사회과 탐구학습의 수용" 9 (9): 127-158, 2002

      5 한글학회, "우리말 큰 사전" 어문각 1992

      6 Sisa english co., "영한대사전" 시사영어(주) 1993

      7 Maxim, G. W., "살아있는 사회과교육" 학지사 2008

      8 송인주, "사회과교육에 있어 탐구학습의 실제" 대구교대초등교육연구원 22 (22): 25-39, 2006

      9 황인석, "사회과 탐구의 후향적 성격 연구 : 콜링우드의 철학적 방법론을 중심으로" 한국교원대학교 대학원 2012

      10 한국교육개발원, "사회과 탐구수업" 한국교육개발원 1975

      1 권오정, "한국 사회과수업의 구성논리와 개혁운동의 한계. 달라져야 할 사회과교육" 교학사 1991

      2 Dewey, J., "하우 위 싱크 과학적 사고의 방법과 교육" 학이시습 2011

      3 홍미화, "초등교사의 사회과 교실 수업 구성에 대한 연구" 한국사회교과교육학회 19 (19): 83-97, 2012

      4 정길용, "제3차 교육과정기 사회과 탐구학습의 수용" 9 (9): 127-158, 2002

      5 한글학회, "우리말 큰 사전" 어문각 1992

      6 Sisa english co., "영한대사전" 시사영어(주) 1993

      7 Maxim, G. W., "살아있는 사회과교육" 학지사 2008

      8 송인주, "사회과교육에 있어 탐구학습의 실제" 대구교대초등교육연구원 22 (22): 25-39, 2006

      9 황인석, "사회과 탐구의 후향적 성격 연구 : 콜링우드의 철학적 방법론을 중심으로" 한국교원대학교 대학원 2012

      10 한국교육개발원, "사회과 탐구수업" 한국교육개발원 1975

      11 정세구, "사회과 탐구수업" 교육과학사 1982

      12 한면희, "사회과 탐구논리" 교육과학사 1998

      13 최용규, "사회과 교수․학습 모형의 특성에 대한 이해" (창간) : 159-172, 1995

      14 박성익, "교수‧학습 방법의 이론과 실제(1)" 교육과학사 1997

      15 Elbaz, F., "The Teacher's Practical Knowledge : Report of a Case Study" 11 (11): 43-71, 1981

      16 Schön, D. A., "The Reflective Turn: Case Studies In and On Educational Practice" Teachers College, Columbia University 1991

      17 Fenton, E., "The New Social Studies" Rinehart and Winston 1967

      18 Hunt, M. P., "Teaching high school Social Studies: Problems in reflective thinking and social understanding" Harper and Row 1968

      19 Russell, T., "Teachers' Professional Knowledge and the Future of Teacher Education" 19 (19): 205-216, 1993

      20 Rugg, H., "Reconstructing the Curriculum, In Educating the Democratic Mind" Univ. New York 1996

      21 정용재, "Peirce의 귀추법에 관한 이론적 고찰을 통한 과학교육적 함의 탐색" 한국과학교육학회 26 (26): 703-722, 2006

      22 Massialas, B. G, "Inquiry in Social Studies" Mcgraw Hill Book Co 1966

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-06 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction -> The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.29 1.29 1.31
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.37 1.42 1.436 0.33
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼