RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    <이춘풍 난봉기>와 <열하일기만보>를 통해 본 손진책의 “마당미학” = Sohn Jin-Chaek`s ``Madang`` Aesthetics in Playboy Lee Chunpoongjeun and Yulha Ilgyee Manbo

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99550821

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Son Jinchaek got into his directing career since 1976 when he founded the theatre group Minye with huhgyu and others. His experience in Minye was the turnaround of his life; Huhgyu was a teacher in his artist`s life whereas Brecht was a teacher for his ideology to make ``Korean Theatre``. From these two teachers, he learned how and why Korean Theatre should be made. Since then, Korean theatre was his calling for 40 years of his directing career. As he established Michoo in 1986, it served a turning point in his art. His focus was on intrinsic attributes of Korean Theatre with Madang Jungshin. With Madang Jungshin, he tried to get over the former generation`s fixation on external materials of Korean traditional theatre and folk culture to make Korean Theatre. Rather, he believed Korean Theatre could be realized when it grafted Korean social reality onto the stage, while the form was subsequent. He advocated Korean Theatre should mirror present social reality and circulate social energy. Also, he did not give up aesthetics. On the contrary, his aesthetic style was conspicuously evident in his productions. In spite of his life long career with noteworthy works, the critical discourses are strikingly scarce especially when compared with other senior and peer directors such as Hugh Gyu, Ahn Minsoo, Oh Taesok, and Lee Yoontaek. During his career he has crossed into various genres from Changeuk, Madangnori, and to theatres, which were too versatile to thread them into a discourse and caused a lack of theoretical greeting. Madangnori has anchored its artistic structure on its polished aesthetics which were acclaimed by the general audience for 30 years. For theatre, he concentrated on one production per year to grasp its own style. Theatre works also had revealed his own style of being opened and of being emptied which was certainly different from Madangnori, but had same aesthetic principle within it. This paper attempts to recompose his stylistic features with ``Madang aesthetics`` which were based on open space, open acting style, and graphic ensemble. This paper tries to demonstrate how his ``Madang aesthetics`` has refined his productions in scenography, acting style, and in more like metaphoric and metonymic symbolic expression of the graphic ensemble. To do this, two productions were explored: Lee Chunpoongjeun and Yulha Ilgyee Manbo. Madangnori was sorely explored by Son Jinchaek with his atistic colleagues Yoon Munshik, Kim Jongyeup, Kim Sungnyu, music designer Park Buhmhoon, and choreographer Guk Sooho. Though it has been ignored for its popular appeal by the doctrinaire theoretical opinions, it started to pull academic attention recently. His theatres are also getting sharp with his ``Madang aesthetics`` as well as minimalistic expression in scenography, acting style, and graphic ensemble. Madang Jungshin is the soul and Madang aesthetics is the body in his artistic works. The Madang Jungshin animates the Madang aesthetics, so they become alive in his theatre.
    번역하기

    Son Jinchaek got into his directing career since 1976 when he founded the theatre group Minye with huhgyu and others. His experience in Minye was the turnaround of his life; Huhgyu was a teacher in his artist`s life whereas Brecht was a teacher for hi...

    Son Jinchaek got into his directing career since 1976 when he founded the theatre group Minye with huhgyu and others. His experience in Minye was the turnaround of his life; Huhgyu was a teacher in his artist`s life whereas Brecht was a teacher for his ideology to make ``Korean Theatre``. From these two teachers, he learned how and why Korean Theatre should be made. Since then, Korean theatre was his calling for 40 years of his directing career. As he established Michoo in 1986, it served a turning point in his art. His focus was on intrinsic attributes of Korean Theatre with Madang Jungshin. With Madang Jungshin, he tried to get over the former generation`s fixation on external materials of Korean traditional theatre and folk culture to make Korean Theatre. Rather, he believed Korean Theatre could be realized when it grafted Korean social reality onto the stage, while the form was subsequent. He advocated Korean Theatre should mirror present social reality and circulate social energy. Also, he did not give up aesthetics. On the contrary, his aesthetic style was conspicuously evident in his productions. In spite of his life long career with noteworthy works, the critical discourses are strikingly scarce especially when compared with other senior and peer directors such as Hugh Gyu, Ahn Minsoo, Oh Taesok, and Lee Yoontaek. During his career he has crossed into various genres from Changeuk, Madangnori, and to theatres, which were too versatile to thread them into a discourse and caused a lack of theoretical greeting. Madangnori has anchored its artistic structure on its polished aesthetics which were acclaimed by the general audience for 30 years. For theatre, he concentrated on one production per year to grasp its own style. Theatre works also had revealed his own style of being opened and of being emptied which was certainly different from Madangnori, but had same aesthetic principle within it. This paper attempts to recompose his stylistic features with ``Madang aesthetics`` which were based on open space, open acting style, and graphic ensemble. This paper tries to demonstrate how his ``Madang aesthetics`` has refined his productions in scenography, acting style, and in more like metaphoric and metonymic symbolic expression of the graphic ensemble. To do this, two productions were explored: Lee Chunpoongjeun and Yulha Ilgyee Manbo. Madangnori was sorely explored by Son Jinchaek with his atistic colleagues Yoon Munshik, Kim Jongyeup, Kim Sungnyu, music designer Park Buhmhoon, and choreographer Guk Sooho. Though it has been ignored for its popular appeal by the doctrinaire theoretical opinions, it started to pull academic attention recently. His theatres are also getting sharp with his ``Madang aesthetics`` as well as minimalistic expression in scenography, acting style, and graphic ensemble. Madang Jungshin is the soul and Madang aesthetics is the body in his artistic works. The Madang Jungshin animates the Madang aesthetics, so they become alive in his theatre.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "황현희(<이춘풍난봉기>와 <열하일기만보> 출연 ‘미추’ 극단 배우)와 필자와의 인터뷰"

    2 김성희, "한국 현대극의 형성과 쟁점" 연극과인간 2007

    3 김방옥, "한국 현대 연기에 있어서 전통적 요소의 수용과 모색" 한국연극학회 (28) : 53-126, 2006

    4 한상철, "한국 연극의 쟁점과 비평" 현대 미학사 1992

    5 유민영, "한국 연극의 사적 성찰과 지향" 푸른 사상 2010

    6 김광선, "한국 연극 무대의 브레히트 수용에 관한 고찰" 4 : 5-22, 1997

    7 김용수, "퍼포먼스 연구의 시각에서 본 한국연극학의 새로운 접근방법-한국연극의 전통수용을 중심으로" 한국연극학회 (29) : 39-82, 2006

    8 김남수, "철학극장, 알레고리와 관념 사이로 어슬렁 거리다-<열하일기만보>" 45 : 177-185, 2007

    9 "전지현(<이춘풍난봉기> 조연출)과 필자와의 인터뷰"

    10 김지일, "이춘풍난봉기"

    1 "황현희(<이춘풍난봉기>와 <열하일기만보> 출연 ‘미추’ 극단 배우)와 필자와의 인터뷰"

    2 김성희, "한국 현대극의 형성과 쟁점" 연극과인간 2007

    3 김방옥, "한국 현대 연기에 있어서 전통적 요소의 수용과 모색" 한국연극학회 (28) : 53-126, 2006

    4 한상철, "한국 연극의 쟁점과 비평" 현대 미학사 1992

    5 유민영, "한국 연극의 사적 성찰과 지향" 푸른 사상 2010

    6 김광선, "한국 연극 무대의 브레히트 수용에 관한 고찰" 4 : 5-22, 1997

    7 김용수, "퍼포먼스 연구의 시각에서 본 한국연극학의 새로운 접근방법-한국연극의 전통수용을 중심으로" 한국연극학회 (29) : 39-82, 2006

    8 김남수, "철학극장, 알레고리와 관념 사이로 어슬렁 거리다-<열하일기만보>" 45 : 177-185, 2007

    9 "전지현(<이춘풍난봉기> 조연출)과 필자와의 인터뷰"

    10 김지일, "이춘풍난봉기"

    11 "윤문식과 경향 신문 인터뷰. 「싸가지 없는 말로 사회풍자, 관객들이 시원해 하죠」"

    12 김옥란, "우리 시대의 극작가" (주)돌꽃컴퍼니/월간객석 2010

    13 배삼식, "열하일기만보"

    14 김방옥, "열린 연극의 미학: 전통극에서 포스트모더니즘까지" 문예마당 1997

    15 김방옥, "열린 연극의 미학" 문예마당 1999

    16 피터 브룩, "열린 문" 평민사 1996

    17 한상철, "연출 작업으로 본 한국 현대 연극" 25-33,

    18 안민수, "연출 기능의 변천" 3 : 131-156, 1989

    19 윤현식, "연극인 허규 연구" 동국대학교 대학원 2003

    20 아우그스트 보알, "아우구스트 보알의 연극 메소드" 현대 미학사 1998

    21 "손진책과 필자와의 인터뷰"

    22 엄현희, "손진책 연출의 〈열하일기만보〉-박지원의 예술과 정치의 결합, 혹은 교란" 현대미학사 56 : 188-190, 2007

    23 베르톨트 브레히트, "새로운 예술을 찾아서" 새길 1998

    24 임진택, "새로운 연극을 위하여: 마당극에 관한 몇 가지 견해" 55 : 97-122, 1980

    25 오성균, "브레히트의 서사극 이론에서 게스투스 개념이 갖는 의미" 4 : 173-198, 1997

    26 김미도, "배삼식과 손진책의 유유자적 고전 읽기-극단 ‘미추’의 <열하일기만보>" 2007

    27 Benjamin, Walter, "문예이론" 민음사 1983

    28 김방옥, "모방으로부터의 탈주: 무대 위의 동물, 혹은 ‘동물되기’-<염소, 혹은 실비라는 누구인가?>, <열하일기만보>" 45 : 101-116, 2007

    29 안진상, "마당놀이의 역사적 전개와 문화산업적 성과 : 극단 '미추'의 마당놀이를 중심으로" 중앙대학교 국악교육대학원 2012

    30 정지창, "마당극의 성과와 과제, In 서사극, 마당극, 민족극" 창작과 비평 40-66,

    31 김월덕, "마당극의 공연학적 특성과 문화적 의미" 11 : 349-378, 2000

    32 "김상희(<열하일기만보> 조연출)와 필자와의 인터뷰"

    33 손희영, "극단 미추 마당놀이 연구 : 축제적 성격을 중심으로" 울산대학교 대학원 2011

    34 이유라, "극단 「미추」의 마당놀이 연구" 동국대학교 대학원 2005

    35 은현정, "고전 고설의 현대적 변용에 대한 문화론적 고찰 - 마당놀이 <이춘풍 난봉기>를 중심으로 -" 겨레어문학회 (43) : 151-172, 2009

    36 "http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=200811241820025&code=210000"

    37 Guay, Louis-Martin, "Theatre of the Unexpected: When the Spectator becomes the actor" 143 : 6-10, 2010

    38 한정양, "<이춘풍전>과 그 상호 관련 작품 연구" 강원대학교 교육대학원 2004

    39 유민영, "20세기 후반의 연극 문화" 국학자료원 2000

    40 김숙경, "1970년대 이후 한국 현대극 연출에 나타난 전통의 현대화 양상 연구 : 김정옥,오태석,손진책,김명곤,이윤택을 중심으로" 중앙대학교 대학원 2009

    41 백현미, "1950년대, 60년대 한국 전통 담론에 대한 연구" 14 : 45-87, 2000

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-07-05 학술지등록 한글명 : 한국연극학
    외국어명 : Journal of Korean Theatre Studies Association
    KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.34 0.34 0.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.36 0.34 0.825 0.04
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼