항해용선계약상 도착선의 판단기준에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Judgement Criterion of Arrived Ship under Voyage Charterparty

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of the study aims to analyse the judgement criterion of arrived ship under voyage charterparty with the Merida Case. A ship is an arrived ship if she is in port and either able to proceed immediately to a berth or in such a position that she is at the immediate and effective disposition of the chaterparty. Identification of the specified destination-whether berth or port-impacts on the incidence of loss occasioned by delay in loading or discharging, when the delay is due to the place at which the vessel is obliged by the terms of the charterparty to load or discharge her cargo being occupied by other shipping. The Merida case is an appeal by the charterers from a final Arbitration award of two very experienced arbitrators, dated 20th April, 2009. The arbitrators held that a voyage charterparty, dated 5th February, 2007, of the vessel, The M/V Merida, entered into between charterers and the owners, was a port rather than a berth Charterparty. The Primary relevance of this distinction does to the allocation, as between owners and charterers, of the risk of delay caused by congestion at load and discharge ports. The question of law arising in this appeal is whether the arbitrators were right to conclude that the charterparty was a port and not a berth charterparty. The arbitrators additionary placed some reliance on a post-contractual e-mail from the agents, which suggested that charterers did not dispute the validity of the NOR-and, hence, that this was a port charterparty.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정영석, "해운실무" 해인출판사 2004

2 이용근, "항해용선계약의 법리에 관한 연구" 한국해운학회 1990 (1990): 89-110, 1990

3 우성구, "항해용선계약에서 체선료와 부적운임에 관한 판례분석―Johnny K호 사건을 중심으로―" 한국국제상학회 22 (22): 69-85, 2007

4 박길상, "항해용선계약에서 정박기간의 개시요건" 한국해법학회 28 (28): 279-295, 2006

5 한낙현, "항해용선계약상 안전항담보의무위반에 의한 초과정박손해배상금의 청구에 관한 연구" 한국항만경제학회 25 (25): 149-176, 2009

6 이승환, "항해용선계약상 도착선에 관한 연구 : Johanna Oldendorff호 사건을 중심으로" 성균관대학교 대학원 2012

7 이원정, "항해용선계약상 F.I.O.조건 판결사례연구 -The Jordan Ⅱ사건에서 영국 최고법원 판결을 중심으로" 한국국제상학회 22 (22): 45-65, 2007

8 이광희, "용선계약실무" 박영사 2009

9 임석민, "국제운송론(제3판)" 삼영사 2007

10 谷本裕範, "新·傭船契約の實務的解說" 成山堂 2008

11 Cooke, J., "Voyage Charterers, 3rd ed" Informa 2007

12 Berlingieri, F., "The Allocation of Risk in voyage charter parties" 8 : 497-, 1977

13 Boyd, S. C., "Scrutton on Charterparties and Bill of Lading, 21st ed" Sweet & Maxwell Ltd 2008

14 Schofield, J., "Laytime and Demurrage, 6th ed" Informa Law 2011

15 Davies, D., "Commencement of Laytime, 4th ed" informa 2006

16 Williams, H., "Chartering Document, 3rd ed" Lloyd’s of London Press Ltd. 1996

17 Dockray, M., "Cases and Materials on the Carriage of Goods by Sea, 3rd ed" Cavendish Publishing Ltd 2004

18 Wilson, J. F., "Carriage of Goods by Sea, 7th ed" Pearson Education Ltd 2010

19 Rainey, S., "Arrival, Readiness and the Commencement of Laytime, In The Evolving Law and Practice of Voyage Charterparties" informa 2009

20 Carver, T. C., "A Treaties on the Law Related to Carriage of Goods by Sea, 3rd ed" Stevens & Sons Ltd 1909

21 김정회, "1994년 Gencon 항해용선계약서에 관한 고찰" 한국해운학회 43-73, 1999