컨볼루션 신경망을 기반으로 한 의료 이미지의 NR-IQA 연구 쉬 멍 동신대학교 대학원 컴퓨터학과 (지도교수 이태원) 이미지 품질 평가는 지난 십여 년 동안 관련 이미지 전송 하드웨어, 이미지...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16952379
나주 : 동신대학교 일반대학원, 2024
학위논문(박사) -- 동신대학교 일반대학원 , 컴퓨터학과 , 2024. 2
2024
한국어
전이 학습 ; 의료 영상 ; 무 참조 이미지 품질 평가 ; 컨볼루션 신경망 ; 심층 학습
전라남도
; 26 cm
지도교수: 이태원
I804:46001-200000743138
0
상세조회0
다운로드컨볼루션 신경망을 기반으로 한 의료 이미지의 NR-IQA 연구 쉬 멍 동신대학교 대학원 컴퓨터학과 (지도교수 이태원) 이미지 품질 평가는 지난 십여 년 동안 관련 이미지 전송 하드웨어, 이미지...
컨볼루션 신경망을 기반으로 한 의료 이미지의 NR-IQA 연구 쉬 멍 동신대학교 대학원 컴퓨터학과 (지도교수 이태원) 이미지 품질 평가는 지난 십여 년 동안 관련 이미지 전송 하드웨어, 이미지 소프 트웨어, 이미지 수집 기술, 이미지 재구성 또는 이미지 처리 알고리즘 등에서 중요 한 역할을 하고 있다. 의료 이미지는 특수한 이미지 형성 방식을 가지고 있으며, 다 양한 이미지 형식에서 많은 다른 특징과 내용이 존재하여 현실 세계에서 완벽한 의 료 참조 이미지를 찾을 수 없게 된다. 이러한 여러 요소를 고려하여 인간의 주관적 인 평가에 맞으며 강력한 일반화 능력을 갖춘 의료 이미지 품질 평가 모델을 설계 하는 것은 중요한 응용 가치를 가지고 있다. 이 논문에서는 공개 데이터셋에서 다양한 의료 이미지 데이터를 수집하였으며, 일 반적으로 사용되는 데이터셋 확장 방법과는 다른 왜곡 확장 방법을 사용하였으며. 가우시안 잡음, 소금-후추 잡음, 점 잡음, 포아송 잡음 등의 잡음 유형이 포함되었 다. 교사 및 대학원 평가 그룹에 의해 평가, 점수 처리 및 이상치 제거를 거친 후, 868개의 점수 라벨이 부여된 이미지를 모델의 훈련 및 테스트 샘플로 사용하였다. 전이 학습 기반의 컨볼루션 신경망 의료 영상 품질 평가 모델 은 다양한 분류 감 지 CNN을 기반으로 구성되었으며, 전이 학습을 활용하여 네트워크 모델을 수정하 고 구조를 조정하여 분류 감지 작업을 의료 영상 품질 평가 작업으로 전환하였다. 이를 통해 의료 영상 품질 평가 데이터셋의 학습과 검증을 수행하였다. 다양한 네트워크 모델을 비교하여 여러 실험 지표를 평가하였다. 실험 결과, 테스 트에서 모델의 예측 점수와 주관적인 평가 점수 사이의 피어슨 상관 계수가 최대 0.9690, 스피어만의 순위 상관계수가 최대 0.9625, 켄달 순위 상관 계수가 최대 0.6599로 나타났으며, 평균 제곱 오차가 4.7330로 가장 낮게 나타났으며, 평균 절대 오차가 3.4010로 가장 낮게 나타났으며, 이는 모델의 높은 견고성과 유효성을 검증 하였다. 본 연구에서 개발한 의료 영상 품질 평가 모델은 강력하고 효과적이며, 일반화 능 력도 뛰어나다는 것을 확인하였다. 이 모델은 인간의 주관적인 평가와도 일치하며, 향후 연구에서 더욱 발전할 가능성을 가지고 있다. 주제어: 전이 학습, 의료 영상, 무 참조 이미지 품질 평가, 컨볼루션 신경망, 심층 학습
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1. Noise-Blind Image Deblurring, Paolo Favaro, Meiguang Jin, Stefan Roth, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017 IEEE Conference onpp.3834-3842, , 2017
2. Unbiased look at dataset bias, A. Efros, A. Torralba and, InProc. CVPR,2011 INSIDabcdef_:MS_0001MS_0001, , 2011
3. Undoing the damage of dataset bias, T. Malisiewicz, A. Khosla, A. Torralba, T. Zhou, A. Efros and, In Proc. ECCV,2012, , 2012
4. Learning bounds for domain adaptation, F. Pereira and, A. Kulesza, K. Crammer, J. Wortman, J. Blitzer, In Proc. NIPS,2007, , 2007
5. Domain adaptation for object recognition, R. Gopalan, R. Li and, R. Chellappa, An unsupervised approach In Proc. ICCV,2011, , 2011
6. 评价图像质量指标以增强清晰度, 姚诚,陈光学., 第十届图像与信号处理与分析研 讨会论文集,2017pp.115-120, , 2017
7. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, K. He, J. Sun, X. Zhang, S. Ren and, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp.770-778,2016, , 2016
8. CUQI: cardiac ultrasound video quality index., Razaak, Manzoor and, Maria G Martini, ,2016pp.011-012, , 2016
9. Adapting visual category models to new domains, M. Fritz and, B. Kulis, T. Darrell, K. Saenko, . In Proc. ECCV,2010, , 2010
10. LIVE Image quality assessment database release 2, Cormack L, Bovik A C, Wang Z, Sheikh H R, available,2015, , 2015
1. Noise-Blind Image Deblurring, Paolo Favaro, Meiguang Jin, Stefan Roth, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017 IEEE Conference onpp.3834-3842, , 2017
2. Unbiased look at dataset bias, A. Efros, A. Torralba and, InProc. CVPR,2011 INSIDabcdef_:MS_0001MS_0001, , 2011
3. Undoing the damage of dataset bias, T. Malisiewicz, A. Khosla, A. Torralba, T. Zhou, A. Efros and, In Proc. ECCV,2012, , 2012
4. Learning bounds for domain adaptation, F. Pereira and, A. Kulesza, K. Crammer, J. Wortman, J. Blitzer, In Proc. NIPS,2007, , 2007
5. Domain adaptation for object recognition, R. Gopalan, R. Li and, R. Chellappa, An unsupervised approach In Proc. ICCV,2011, , 2011
6. 评价图像质量指标以增强清晰度, 姚诚,陈光学., 第十届图像与信号处理与分析研 讨会论文集,2017pp.115-120, , 2017
7. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, K. He, J. Sun, X. Zhang, S. Ren and, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp.770-778,2016, , 2016
8. CUQI: cardiac ultrasound video quality index., Razaak, Manzoor and, Maria G Martini, ,2016pp.011-012, , 2016
9. Adapting visual category models to new domains, M. Fritz and, B. Kulis, T. Darrell, K. Saenko, . In Proc. ECCV,2010, , 2010
10. LIVE Image quality assessment database release 2, Cormack L, Bovik A C, Wang Z, Sheikh H R, available,2015, , 2015
11. Analysis of representations for domain adaptation, J. Blitzer, S. Ben-David, F. Pereira et al, K. Crammer, Proc. NIPS,2007, , 2007
12. On ambiguity of objective image quality assessment, M. Cheon, J.-S. Lee, Electronics Letterspp.34-35, , 2016
13. 用于无参考图像质量评价的混合NSS特征, 秦敏,吕晓新,陈晓慧,王卫东., 图像 处理IET,2017pp.443-449, , 2017
14. No-reference image quality metrics for structural MRI, Carley-Spencer MP, Woodard JP, Neuroinformatics,pp.243-262,2006, , 2006
15. Deep domain confusion:Maximizing for domain invariance, Zhang, Hoffman, J., Tzeng, E., arXiv preprint 2011. INSIDabcdef_:MS_0001MS_0001, , 2011
16. How transferable are features in deep neural networks?, Clune, J., Lipson, H., Bengio, Y. and, Yosinski, J., In Advances in neural information processing systems,pp3320–3328,2014, , 2014
17. Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation, B. Gong, Y. Shi, K. Grauman, F. Sha and, In Proc. CVPR,2012, , 2012
18. Multivariate Statistical Approach to Image QualityTasks, Gupta, Praful et al, pp.302-304, , 2018
19. Blind curvelet watermarking method forhigh-quality images, S.-H. Nam, W.-H. Kim, H.-K. Lee, Electronics Letterspp.1302-1304. INSIDabcdef_:MS_0001MS_0001, , 2017
20. One-shot learning of supervised deep convolutional models, J. Hoffman, K. Saenko and, T. Darrell, E. Tzeng, Y. Jia, J. Donahue, In arXiv 1312.6204; presented at ICLR Workshop,2014, , 2014
21. Tabula rasa: Model transfer for object category detection, A. Zisserman, Y. Aytar and, In Proc. ICCV,2011, , 2011
22. Multi-column deep neural networks for image classification, U. Meier and, D. C. Ciresan, J. Schmidhuber, In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,pp.3642 –3649,2021, , 2021
23. Objective Video QualityAssessment Based on Neural Networks, Carlos A. B. Mello, Diego P. A. Menor, Cleber Zanchettin, pp1551-1559, , 2016
24. Adapting SVM classifiers to data with shifted distributions, R. Yan and, A. Hauptmann, J. Yang, In ICDM Workshops,2007, , 2007
25. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain, A. C. Bovik, A. Mittal, A. K. Moorthy, IEEE Trans. Image Process.21(12),pp.4695 –4708,2012, , 2012
26. Discovering latent domains for multisource domain adaptation, J. Hoffman, T. Darrell and, K. Saenko, B. Kulis, In Proc. ECCV,2012, , 2012
27. Efficient learning of domain-invariant image representations, E. Rodner, T. Darrell, J. Donahue, K. Saenko and, J. Hoffman, In Proc. ICLR,2013, , 2013
28. No-reference image quality assessment using visual codebooks, Doermann, D. Peng Ye, IEEE Trans. Image Process.21(7),2012,pp.3129–3138, , 2012
29. Nonlocal Means-Based Speckle Filtering for Ultrasound Images, Kervrann C , et al, Hellier P, Coupe P, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,pp.2221-2229,2009, , 2009
30. Phase congruence measurement for image similarity assessment, LAGANIRER, LIU Zheng, Pattern Recognition,pp.166-172,2007., , 2007
31. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment for Defocus Restoration, Chengshuo Zhang, Baoshu Xu, Bin Feng, Zelin Shi, Multimedia and Image Processing (ICMIP) 2016 First International Conference on,2016pp.51-56, , 2016
32. SOM: Semantic obviousness metric for image quality assessment, L. Wu and, W. Zhou, H. Li, P . Zhang, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,pp.2394–2402,2015, , 2015
33. A trainable feature extractor for handwritten digit recognition, Bloch G, Suen CY, Lauer F, Pattern Recogn pp.1816–1824,2007, , 2007
34. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, I. Sutskever and, A. Krizhevsky, G. E. Hinton, In NIPS,2012:4, , 2012
35. Learning convolutional feature hierachies for visual recognition, Y .-L. Boureau, K. Kavukcuoglu, K. Gregor, Y . LeCun, P . Sermanet, M. Mathieu and, In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS),2010, , 2010
36. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A., International conference on learning representations,2015, , 2015
37. Medical Image Quality Assessment Using CSO Based Deep Neural Network, Jayageetha J, Vasanthanayaki C., pp.42(11):224,2018, , 2018
38. A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognition, J. Hoffman, Y. Jia, N. Zhang, J. Donahue, E. Tzeng and, T. Darrell, O. Vinyals, In Proc. ICML,2014, , 2014
39. No-reference synthetic image quality assessment using scene statistics, Debarati Kundu, Brian L. Evans, Signals Systems and Computers 2015 49th Asilomar Conference on,2015pp.1579-1583, , 2015
40. Convolutional Neural Networks for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment,, L. Kang, D. Doermann, Y. Li and, P. Ye, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,pp.1733–1740,2014, , 2014
41. Deep Convolution Neural Network for Big Data Medical Image Classification, R. Ashraf et al., in IEEE Access, vol.8, pp.105659-105670, , 2020
42. Deep Learning in Large and Multi-Site Structural Brain MR Imaging Datasets., Bento M, Rittner L, Park J, Frayne R., Fantini I, Front Neuroinform.15:805669, , 2022
43. Comparison of image quality assessment methods formulti-focused image fusion, A. Noskov and, A. Priorov, 2017 20th Conference of Open Innovations Association(FRUCT),pp.339-344, , 2017
44. Tongue image quality assessment based on a deep convolutional neural network, Yao XH, Wu QF, Jiang T, Huang JB, Cui J, Xu INSIDabcdef_, Hu XJ, Tu LP, Ma XX, MS_0001MS_0001 JT, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. pp.5;21(1):147.2021, , 2021
45. Interobserver variability in quality assessment of magnetic resonance images., Obuchowicz, Rafal et al, BMC medical imaging,. pp.109-122, , 2020
46. Massive online crowdsourced study of subjective and objective picture quality, A. C. Bovik, D. Ghadiyaram and, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.25,pp.372–387,2016, , 2016
47. A CNN based neurobiology inspired approach for retinal image quality assessment, Roy PK, Mahapatra D, Garnavi R., Sedai S, Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. pp.1304-1307,2016, , 2016
48. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization, A. Das, D. Parikh and, D. Batra, R. R. Selvaraju, R. Vedantam, M. Cogswell, IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 618-626,2017, , 2017
49. Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment, Samek W., Muller KR, Maniry D, Wiegand T, Bosse S, IEEE Trans Image Process,pp.206-219,2018, , 2018
50. FUIQA Fetal Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment With Deep Convolutional Networks., Li S, Ni D., Wang T, Lei B, Cheng JZ, Wu L, IEEE Trans Cybern. pp:1336-1349,2017, , 2017
51. Mobilenets Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications, Howard A, Zhu M, Chen B, et al, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,2017, , 2017
52. Unsupervised feature learning framework for no-reference image quality assessment, D. Doermann, P. Ye, L. Kangand, J. Kumar, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,pp.1098–1105,2012, , 2012
53. All-reference IPTV image quality assessment through deep learning structural clues, Kong Yanqiang, Liu Cui, Hou Rui, Signal processing: image communication,2020,pp.83-84, , 2020
54. Automated detection of COVID-19 cases using deep neural networks with X-ray images, Tulin Ozturk, Muhammed Talo, U. Rajendra Acharya, Ulas Baran Baloglu, Ozal Yildirim, Eylul Azra Yildirim, Computers in Biology and Medicine ,Vol.121,2020, , 2020
55. Modified-BRISQUE as no reference image quality assessment for structural MR images, Rajagopal H., Chow LS, pp.43:74-87,2017, , 2017
56. Blind image quality assessment: from natural scene statistics to perceptual quality, A. C. Bovik, A. K. Moorthy, IEEE Trans. Image Process.20(12),2011pp.3350–3364, , 2011
57. No-reference visually significant blocking artifact metric for natural scene images, S. Suthaharan, Signal Process.89(8),2009pp.1647–1652, , 2009
58. A content-specific IQM augmentation technique for better assessment of image quality, Irene Cheng, Navaneeth Kamballur Kottayil, Systems Man and Cybernetics (SMC) 2017 IEEE International Conference on,2017pp.1289-1303, , 2017
59. Blind image quality assessment: a natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain, A. C. Bovik, M. A. Saad, C. Charrier, IEEE Trans. Image Process.21(8),2012,pp.3339–3352, , 2012
60. What you saw is not what you get: Domain adaptation using asymmetric kernel transforms, K. Saenko and, B. Kulis, T. Darrell, In Proc. CVPR,2011, , 2011
61. For subjective classification of training data quality assessment with uncertain labels, DaiYing, pp.152-168, , 2017
62. Ultrasound image quality assessment: a framework for evaluation of clinical image quality, M. M. Pedersen, M. C. Hemmsen, M. B. Nielsen, S. I. Nikolov, J. A. Jensen, Proc. SPIE 7629 Medical Imaging,pp.1020-1022, , 2010
63. Quality assessment of compressed MR medical images using general regression neural network, K. Thakur, B. Kumar, G. R. Sinha, Int. J. Pure Appl. Sci,2011pp158–169, , 2011
64. Batch NormalizationAccelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift., C. Szegedy, S. Ioffe and, In ICML,2015, , 2015
65. Analysis of various quality metrics for medical INSIDabcdef_:MS_0001MS_0001 image processing, R. Kumar, M. Rattan, Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 2 (11) ,2012 pp137–144, , 2012
66. Learning a blind measure of perceptual INSIDabcdef_:MS_0001MS_0001 image quality in CVPR 2011, A. Kapoor, N. Joshi, H. Tang, Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR), Colorado Springs,CO,2011pp.305–312, , 2011
67. Performance Analysis of CWSSIM VideoQuality Metric with Different Window Size on LIVE Database, K . Ganesh, Chandrashekar M. Patil, Current Trends in Computer Electrical Electronics and Communication (CTCEEC) 2017 InternationalConference on,2017pp.263-266, , 2017
68. Perceptual Quality Prediction on Authentically Distorted Images Using a Bag of Features Approach, Ghadiyaram, Deepti, Bovik, Alan., pp126-132, , 2016
69. Convolutional Neural Networks INSIDabcdef_:MS_0001MS_0001 for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment, L. Kang, D. Doermann, Y. Li and, P. Ye, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,pp.1733-1740,2014, , 2014
70. A FlexibleFuzzy Regression Method for Addressing Nonlinear Uncertainty on Aesthetic QualityAssessments, Kit Yan Chan, Hak-Keung Lam, Tharam S. Dillon, Cedric Ka Fai Yiu, Systems Man and Cybernetics: Systems IEEE Transactions onpp.2363-2377, , 2017
71. No-reference stereoscopic image quality assessment based on image distortion and stereo perceptual information, Wu, D., Shen, L., Fang, R., Yao, Y. and, IEEE Trans. Emerg. Topics Comput.2018, , 2018
72. Local Indicators of Spatial Autocorrelation (LISA):Application to Blind Noise-Based Perceptual Quality Metric Index for MagneticResonance Images., Osadebey, Michael et al., ,2019pp.210-213, , 2019
73. Despeckle Filtering for Multiscale Amplitude-ModulationFrequency-Modulation (AM-FM) Texture Analysis of Ultrasound Images of theIntima-Media Complex., Loizou, C P et al, ,2014pp.518-519, , 2014