RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    기업의 장기적인 조세회피 예측변수로서 유효세율의 평가 및 결정요인에 관한 연구 = The Study on Evaluation and Determinant Factor of Effective Tax Rates as an Expectation Factor for Long-run Corporate Tax Avoidance

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101975396

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper analyzes corporate tax avoidance for relations between annual effective tax rates and long-run effective tax rates over long time periods as measured and evaluated under five criteria in addition to the determining factors associated with corporate tax avoidance. If tax avoidance is defined as the low burden status of explicit tax payment, then tax avoidance should meet the conditions which aren`t subject to additional taxes and tax penalties. Consequently, tax avoidance should be investigated in long periods. If a company goes through tax assessment with severe penalties during periodic tax audit even though it successfully avoids taxes annually, the tax savings strategy would turn out as tax evasion and the tax burden would be raised further. The tax avoidance measures presented in prior literatures have problems where they did not show the results of long-run tax strategies but rather only documented incidences of non-conforming tax avoidance. This paper uses five different long-run effective tax rate measures, such as Gaap ETR, Current ETR, Cash ETR, Tax ETR, ETR Differential proxies for measuring corporate tax avoidance. Consequently, this paper uses the long-run effective tax rates to examine the extent to which some firms are able to avoid taxes over periods as long as ten years. Using the various long-run effective tax rates, this paper also assesses the accuracy of this data for verifying whether there has been cases of corporate tax avoidance as previously shown by Graham(1996) and Plesko(2003). Utilizing a sample of 1,750 firms, I find that there is considerable cross-sectional variation in tax avoidance. First, the results indicate that Gaap ETR, Current ETR, Cash ETR, Tax ETR, ETR Differential proxies for annual effective tax rates are good predictors of long-run effective tax rate. Second, according to the Graham(1996) model, Cash ETR are positive criteria in demonstrating whether a corporation utilized tax avoidance schemes. On the other hand, as per the Plesko(2003) model, the positive criterion is shown by the use of Gaap ETR. Finally, the results of this paper establishes CAPIN, ROA, and FRGN as determining factors of long-run corporate tax avoidance while SIZE, LEV, BIG4, and LNFEE shows low efficacy. The results contribute to this area of research. First, this research investigates in a synthetical manner the reliability and persistency of overall short-term tax avoidance measures in prior literature. The results suggest the significances which identify the characteristics of short-term tax avoidance measures and compare natures of them. Second, this paper investigates the effect of the volatility of short-term tax avoidance on long-run tax avoidance over the simple observation on the association between short-term and long-run tax avoidance. The result shows the volatility has positive relations with long-run tax avoidance in continuous tax strategy. The long-run Gaap ETR, Current ETR, Cash ETR, Tax ETR, ETR Differential shows the capability of capturing the conforming long-run corporate tax avoidance.
    번역하기

    This paper analyzes corporate tax avoidance for relations between annual effective tax rates and long-run effective tax rates over long time periods as measured and evaluated under five criteria in addition to the determining factors associated with c...

    This paper analyzes corporate tax avoidance for relations between annual effective tax rates and long-run effective tax rates over long time periods as measured and evaluated under five criteria in addition to the determining factors associated with corporate tax avoidance. If tax avoidance is defined as the low burden status of explicit tax payment, then tax avoidance should meet the conditions which aren`t subject to additional taxes and tax penalties. Consequently, tax avoidance should be investigated in long periods. If a company goes through tax assessment with severe penalties during periodic tax audit even though it successfully avoids taxes annually, the tax savings strategy would turn out as tax evasion and the tax burden would be raised further. The tax avoidance measures presented in prior literatures have problems where they did not show the results of long-run tax strategies but rather only documented incidences of non-conforming tax avoidance. This paper uses five different long-run effective tax rate measures, such as Gaap ETR, Current ETR, Cash ETR, Tax ETR, ETR Differential proxies for measuring corporate tax avoidance. Consequently, this paper uses the long-run effective tax rates to examine the extent to which some firms are able to avoid taxes over periods as long as ten years. Using the various long-run effective tax rates, this paper also assesses the accuracy of this data for verifying whether there has been cases of corporate tax avoidance as previously shown by Graham(1996) and Plesko(2003). Utilizing a sample of 1,750 firms, I find that there is considerable cross-sectional variation in tax avoidance. First, the results indicate that Gaap ETR, Current ETR, Cash ETR, Tax ETR, ETR Differential proxies for annual effective tax rates are good predictors of long-run effective tax rate. Second, according to the Graham(1996) model, Cash ETR are positive criteria in demonstrating whether a corporation utilized tax avoidance schemes. On the other hand, as per the Plesko(2003) model, the positive criterion is shown by the use of Gaap ETR. Finally, the results of this paper establishes CAPIN, ROA, and FRGN as determining factors of long-run corporate tax avoidance while SIZE, LEV, BIG4, and LNFEE shows low efficacy. The results contribute to this area of research. First, this research investigates in a synthetical manner the reliability and persistency of overall short-term tax avoidance measures in prior literature. The results suggest the significances which identify the characteristics of short-term tax avoidance measures and compare natures of them. Second, this paper investigates the effect of the volatility of short-term tax avoidance on long-run tax avoidance over the simple observation on the association between short-term and long-run tax avoidance. The result shows the volatility has positive relations with long-run tax avoidance in continuous tax strategy. The long-run Gaap ETR, Current ETR, Cash ETR, Tax ETR, ETR Differential shows the capability of capturing the conforming long-run corporate tax avoidance.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 고윤성, "조세회피와 기업특성 및 기업가치에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 대학원 2007

    2 안숙찬, "조세부담과 기업특성" (8) : 125-152, 1996

    3 김성기, "유효법인세율 결정요인에 관한 연구" (12) : 100-118, 1994

    4 최명근, "세법학총론" 67-96, 2007

    5 김진회, "기업의 재무적 특성이 조세회피에 미치는 영향" 한국세무학회 23 (23): 97-124, 2006

    6 Wilkie, P., "The Relationship Between Firm Size and Effective Tax Rate: A Reconciliation of Zimmerman[1983] and Porcano[1986]" 76-91, 1990

    7 Palmrose, Z, "The Relation of Audit Contract Tape to Audit Fees and Hour" 64 (64): 488-499, 1989

    8 Francis, J., "The Effect of Audit Size on Audit Prices" 6 : 133-151, 1984

    9 Zimmerman, J., "Taxes and Firm Size" 5 : 119-149, 1983

    10 Scholes, M., "Taxes and Business Strategy: A Planning Approach" Prentice-Hall,Inc 2009

    1 고윤성, "조세회피와 기업특성 및 기업가치에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 대학원 2007

    2 안숙찬, "조세부담과 기업특성" (8) : 125-152, 1996

    3 김성기, "유효법인세율 결정요인에 관한 연구" (12) : 100-118, 1994

    4 최명근, "세법학총론" 67-96, 2007

    5 김진회, "기업의 재무적 특성이 조세회피에 미치는 영향" 한국세무학회 23 (23): 97-124, 2006

    6 Wilkie, P., "The Relationship Between Firm Size and Effective Tax Rate: A Reconciliation of Zimmerman[1983] and Porcano[1986]" 76-91, 1990

    7 Palmrose, Z, "The Relation of Audit Contract Tape to Audit Fees and Hour" 64 (64): 488-499, 1989

    8 Francis, J., "The Effect of Audit Size on Audit Prices" 6 : 133-151, 1984

    9 Zimmerman, J., "Taxes and Firm Size" 5 : 119-149, 1983

    10 Scholes, M., "Taxes and Business Strategy: A Planning Approach" Prentice-Hall,Inc 2009

    11 Graham, J., "Tax Shelters and Corporate Debt Policy" 81 : 563-594, 1996

    12 Mills, L., "Strategic Tax and Financial Reporting Decisions : Theory and Evidence" 17 (17): 85-106, 2000

    13 Omer, T., "Measurement of Effective Corporate Tax Rates Using Financial Statement Information" 13 (13): 77-92, 1991

    14 Wilkie, P., "Measurement Explicit Tax (Dis)Advantage for Corporate Taxpayers: An Alternative to Average Effective Tax Rates" 46-71, 1993

    15 Dyreng, S., "Long-Run Corporate Tax Avoidance" 83 (83): 61-82, 2008

    16 Shackelford, D., "Empirical Tax Research in Accounting" 321-387, 2001

    17 Stickney, C., "Effective Corporate Tax Rates: the Effect of Size, Capital Intensity, Leverage, and Other Factors" 125-152, 1982

    18 Gupta, S, "Determinants of the Variability in Corporate Effective Tax Rates: Evidence from Longitudinal Data" 16 : 1-34, 1997

    19 Plesko, G., "Corporate Tax Avoidance and the Properties of Corporate Earnings" 727-737, 2004

    20 Desai, M., "Corporate Tax Avoidance and High-powered Incentives" 79 (79): 145-179, 2007

    21 Callihan, D., "Corporate Effective Tax Rates: A Synthesis of the Literature" (13) : 1-43, 1994

    22 Wilkie, P., "Corporate Average Effective Tax Rates and Inferences about Relative Tax Preferences" 75-88, 1988

    23 Plesko, G., "An Evaluation of Alternative Measures of Corporate Tax Rates" 201-226, 2003

    24 Hanlon, M, "A Review of Tax Reserch" 50 : 127-178, 2010

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.99 0.99 1.25
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.35 1.43 2.629 0.29
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼