국어학 : 패러디 광고의 텍스트성 연구 -텔레비전 광고를 중심으로- = A Study on the Textuality of Parody Advertising

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The study is concerned with clarifying the parody characteristics and textuality of the TV advertising text for which parody was used. The advertising discussed in the study is 150 TV advertising texts between 2004 and 2009. The characteristics of parody advertising were surveyed on the basis of the types of original texts and the properties of borrowed factors in Chapter 2, and the basic conditions needed for producing the parody advertising were discussed from the viewpoint of seven kinds of textuality of R. de Beaugrande·W.Dressler(1981) in Chapter 3. First, the original text of parody advertising should basically have `Topicality` and `Popularity` because the topicality can play an effective role in attracting the attention of a receiver and the popularity can make the receiver feel friendly. It was shown that parody advertising parodies a movie, drama, story, TV program, CF, the historical and cultural text, and the widely recognized text and a music video, Sijo, game, and masterpiece. [sum 1] shows the type of the original text of parody advertising in brief. Second, the factors borrowed from an original text when parodying the original text are as follows in details. It was shown that the specific scene of the original text, character appearing on the original text, organization type of the original text, narration structure, plot, situation related to the original text, subject associated with the original text, lingual representation, and picture are borrowed. [sum 2] shows the properties of borrowed factors in brief. Third, the textuality required in producing parody advertising is as follows. ⑴ Intention: The advertising text producer uses parody since the familiarity of an original text attracts the attention of a receiver and makes the receiver fond of advertising. A parodied original text should be explicitly exposed to effectively achieve the intention of the text producer trying to utilize the familiarity of the original text. ⑵ Acceptability: A receiver should know about the original text to have the intention and purpose of a text producer producing parody advertising effectively accomplished. The study makes the acceptability hierarchy for each original text type of parody advertising in consideration of the point. The order is as follows. ⑶ Informativity: The essence of parody advertising is `Imitation` and `Modification`. Therefore, the important issue in producing parody advertising is how strange an original text is made. ⑷ Coherence and ohension: `Coherence` and `Cohension` are the basic factors needed to have parody advertising textual. By the way, organizing parody advertising with Coherence and Cohension is related to the issue of understanding and explaining why the original text was borrowed. The more easily and the more clearly the basis to understand the transfer process between two texts is shown, the more a receiver is impressed with parody advertising. ⑸ Situationality: The sociocultural communication background, existing objects and events, and their progress and context greatly affect the level, slowness and fastness, and array of information. The factor to be seriously considered in relation to `Situationality` when producing parody advertising is that the timing to parody an original text should be proper. As briefly shown above, the study considered the characteristics of parody advertising by focusing on the types of original texts and the properties of the factors borrowed in the original texts and discussed the textuality required to produce the parody advertising based on this. It is thought that it assists in finally clarifying the essence of advertising texts and corresponds with the purpose of text linguistics setting up the categorization of texts as an aim.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 고영근, "한국 텍스트학의 제 과제" 역락 2001

2 이나영, "패러디 광고의 창조성에 관한 연구: 모방광고와의 차이를 중심으" 연세대 2001

3 윤선영, "패러디 광고의 소비자 선호도 연구: TV 광고를 중심으로" 한양대 2002

4 윤재연, "텔레비전 광고텍스트의 기본 구조와 1960년대 텔레비전 광고텍스트의 양상, 우리말의 텍스트 분석과 현상 연구" 역락 131-157, 2008

5 윤재연, "텔레비전 광고 구조의 텍스트 언어학적 연구" 건국대학교 2009

6 고영근, "텍스트이론" 아르케 1999

7 이석규, "텍스트 언어학의 이론과 실제" 박이정 2001

8 이석규, "텍스트 분석의 실제" 역락 2003

9 이석규, "우리말의 텍스트 분석과 현상 연구" 역락 2008

10 양 웅, "어설픈 모방으로부터의 해방구, 패러디: 패러디 광고의 유행과 모방시비" 현대사회문화연구소 50-55, 1998

11 이석주, "대중매체와 언어" 역락

12 김덕자, "기억을 활성화시키는 영화패러디 광고" 한국광고학회 7 (7): 215-239, 1996

13 오장근, "광고와 언어학" 한국독일어문학회 (12) : 355-385, 2000

14 이현우, "광고와 언어" 커뮤니케이션북스 1998

15 김병태, "광고 크리에이티브의 패러디 표현기법 특성과 효과에 관한 연구" 홍익대학교 2002

16 Teun A. van Dijk, "Textwissenschaft Eine inter diziplinare Einfuhrung in: 텍스트학" 민음사 1980

17 Wolfgang Heinemann, "Textliguistik in: 텍스트 언어학 입문" 역락 1991

18 김영호, "TV드라마 패러디 광고의 효과 연구" 홍익대 2000

19 조경섭, "TV광고의 패러디 효과에 관한 연구" 한국광고학회 13 (13): 7-25, 2002

20 윤재연, "TV 광고 텍스트의 전략에 대한 연구" 겨레어문학회 (34) : 59-114, 2005

21 R. de Beaugrande, "Introduction to Text Linguistics in: 텍스트 언어학 입문" 한신문화사 1981

22 Heinz Vater, "Einführung in die Textlinguistik in: 텍스트언어학입문" 한국문화사 1992

23 Hutcheon, Linda, "A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms in: 패로디 이론" 문예출판사 1985