RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      맞벌이 가정의 가족 상호작용과 부모의 양육태도간의 관계

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8040297

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        서울 : 建國大學校, 2000

      • 학위논문사항
      • 발행연도

        2000

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • KDC

        370.13 판사항(4)

      • 발행국(도시)

        서울

      • 형태사항

        iv, 59 장 ; 26 cm.

      • 소장기관
        • 건국대학교 GLOCAL(글로컬)캠퍼스 중원도서관 소장기관정보
        • 건국대학교 상허기념도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한성대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to examine the interaction and parenting behavior in double-income family in order to present the opinions about attaining a favorable relationship between parents and children in a double-income family. This study will examine the influence of interaction to parenting behavior, too.
      Three major questions focused in this study are as follows :
      1. What are the tendencies of interaction of double-income families?
      2. What is the parenting behavior of double-income families?
      3. How does the interaction of double-inncome families make parenting behavior different?
      This study was carried out by a total of 104 randomly chosen subjects aged 5 and 6 year- old in 5 kindergartens operated by Kwan-ak Gu office, in Seoul and their parents who both have jobs. The experimental instrument for this study looked at the each family interacted. It was originally based on FACES III( Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale III) revised by Olsen, portner and Lave and translated by Min, Hye-young(1998). The instrument used to test parenting behavior was Schaefer(1959)'s MBRI(Material Behavior Research Instrument) translated by Lee, Won-young(1983). Also, I used the data from 104 children for final analysis focusing on frequency, percentage, mean scheffe verification by SAS statistics program.
      The result of this study were as follows :
      1. The average score of the double-income family's interaction was 69(SD=7.77), higher than the mean score 50. The interaction of families was divided into the categories of cohesion and adaptability. The average score of cohesion in double-income families was 40 which was comparatively high. The average score of adaptability in double-income families was 29, slightly higher than the average score.
      2. The general parenting behavior of double income families resulted in the mean of 158, where as the medium score was 120. Parenting behavior was divided into 4 subordinate fields such as love, hostility, autonomy, and control parenting behavior. With regard to parenting behavior of subjects in this study, love parenting behavior scored 46(SD=5.65), while hostility parenting behavior scored 40(SD=4.91), atonomy parenting behavior scored 42(SD=4.67), and control parenting behavior scored 30(SD=5.98). Love parenting behavior was higher than the other fields. it can be interpreted that parenting behavior was affectionate regardless of the children's education and parental economic activity.
      3. Love and hostility parenting behavior made a meaningful difference by the cohesion level, between cohesion and adaptability. That is, parenting behavior in double-income families were more loving and less hostile by high cohesion.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to examine the interaction and parenting behavior in double-income family in order to present the opinions about attaining a favorable relationship between parents and children in a double-income family. This study will ex...

      The purpose of this study is to examine the interaction and parenting behavior in double-income family in order to present the opinions about attaining a favorable relationship between parents and children in a double-income family. This study will examine the influence of interaction to parenting behavior, too.
      Three major questions focused in this study are as follows :
      1. What are the tendencies of interaction of double-income families?
      2. What is the parenting behavior of double-income families?
      3. How does the interaction of double-inncome families make parenting behavior different?
      This study was carried out by a total of 104 randomly chosen subjects aged 5 and 6 year- old in 5 kindergartens operated by Kwan-ak Gu office, in Seoul and their parents who both have jobs. The experimental instrument for this study looked at the each family interacted. It was originally based on FACES III( Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale III) revised by Olsen, portner and Lave and translated by Min, Hye-young(1998). The instrument used to test parenting behavior was Schaefer(1959)'s MBRI(Material Behavior Research Instrument) translated by Lee, Won-young(1983). Also, I used the data from 104 children for final analysis focusing on frequency, percentage, mean scheffe verification by SAS statistics program.
      The result of this study were as follows :
      1. The average score of the double-income family's interaction was 69(SD=7.77), higher than the mean score 50. The interaction of families was divided into the categories of cohesion and adaptability. The average score of cohesion in double-income families was 40 which was comparatively high. The average score of adaptability in double-income families was 29, slightly higher than the average score.
      2. The general parenting behavior of double income families resulted in the mean of 158, where as the medium score was 120. Parenting behavior was divided into 4 subordinate fields such as love, hostility, autonomy, and control parenting behavior. With regard to parenting behavior of subjects in this study, love parenting behavior scored 46(SD=5.65), while hostility parenting behavior scored 40(SD=4.91), atonomy parenting behavior scored 42(SD=4.67), and control parenting behavior scored 30(SD=5.98). Love parenting behavior was higher than the other fields. it can be interpreted that parenting behavior was affectionate regardless of the children's education and parental economic activity.
      3. Love and hostility parenting behavior made a meaningful difference by the cohesion level, between cohesion and adaptability. That is, parenting behavior in double-income families were more loving and less hostile by high cohesion.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • A. 연구의 필요성 = 1
      • B. 연구의 목적 및 문제 = 5
      • C. 연구의 제한점 = 5
      • 목차
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • A. 연구의 필요성 = 1
      • B. 연구의 목적 및 문제 = 5
      • C. 연구의 제한점 = 5
      • II. 이론적배경 = 6
      • A. 가족체계이론 = 6
      • B. 부모의 양육태도 = 16
      • C. 어머니의 취업유무와 양육태도와의 관계 = 21
      • III. 연구방법 = 25
      • A. 연구대상 = 25
      • B. 측정도구 = 27
      • C. 연구절차 = 30
      • D. 자료처리 = 30
      • IV. 결과 해석 및 논의 = 31
      • A. 결과해석 = 31
      • 1. 맞벌이 가족상호작용경향 = 32
      • 2. 부모의 양육태도 경향 = 34
      • 3. 가족상호작용에 따른 부모의 양육태도 = 35
      • B. 논의 = 42
      • V. 요약 및 결론
      • A. 요약 = 45
      • B. 결론 = 47
      • C. 제언 = 48
      • 참고문헌 = 49
      • ABSTRACT = 61
      • 부록 = 63
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼