RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    접근성지표 모형개발을 통한 도시계획시설의 서비스수준 분석에 관한 연구 : 서울시 기부채납 공원 및 광장을 중심으로 = Evaluation of urban public service facilities by using accessibility index model : focused on parks and squares donated in Seoul

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12379865

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      화성 : 수원대학교, 2011

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 수원대학교 대학원 , 건축공학과 , 2011

    • 발행연도

      2011

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • KDC

      539.75 판사항(5)

    • DDC

      712.5 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      경기도

    • 형태사항

      88장 : 삽화, 도표, 지도 ; 26 cm

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌: 장 81-84

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 수원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The government receives a certain portion of land in the project area from developers as a donation for public facilities to enhance public good and redeem development profits. In the process, developers typically have the major responsibility of public facility planning while the local authorities passively regulate basic factors including the location, size, and number of the facilities. Due to the lack of either standardized approach or legal basis, the authorities have not been able to design the public facility plan with a whole picture and actively request for necessary facilities. Our study has been motivated to address this problem.
    In order to maximize the benefit of public facilities, their location and development should be determined by primarily considering the needs of the users. After prioritizing them, budget and resource need to be invested by selecting and focusing on the most valuables and demanding needs. To achieve this goal on public facility planning for donated land, the facility map is required to collect and analyze the quality and quantity of services offered by current facilities.
    This facility map enables to identify those who are excluded from the benefit of public facilities. Based on this information, public facility planning can be performed more objectively rather than depending on experts' personal opinions, resulting in effective management of city facilities and maximization of their functional benefits. To systematize this concept, in this study we propose the Accessibility Indicator Model based on previous models.
    We applied this model to public facility planning of public parks and squares which are often donated. Through this model, city facility planning can be presented as a whole picture prior to the development of donated lands; as a result, the following benefits are expected. First, the most demanding public facilities can be provided with priority. Second, companies in charge of the developments can be guided to plan the use of public facilities. Third, authorities in charge of the deliberation or negotiation of the development will be provided with help to make an appropriate and rapid decision. Lastly, expenses due to overlapping functions among facilities will be reduced.
    To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first work to present an objective standards for public facility planning. Our model also has advantage in that it leads to provide public facilities for less developed regions. For further study, more practical models for real world situations are desirable. Specifically, our model can be improved by utilizing more detailed information and can also be more practically utilized by being included in the decision support system of the city planning committee.
    번역하기

    The government receives a certain portion of land in the project area from developers as a donation for public facilities to enhance public good and redeem development profits. In the process, developers typically have the major responsibility of publ...

    The government receives a certain portion of land in the project area from developers as a donation for public facilities to enhance public good and redeem development profits. In the process, developers typically have the major responsibility of public facility planning while the local authorities passively regulate basic factors including the location, size, and number of the facilities. Due to the lack of either standardized approach or legal basis, the authorities have not been able to design the public facility plan with a whole picture and actively request for necessary facilities. Our study has been motivated to address this problem.
    In order to maximize the benefit of public facilities, their location and development should be determined by primarily considering the needs of the users. After prioritizing them, budget and resource need to be invested by selecting and focusing on the most valuables and demanding needs. To achieve this goal on public facility planning for donated land, the facility map is required to collect and analyze the quality and quantity of services offered by current facilities.
    This facility map enables to identify those who are excluded from the benefit of public facilities. Based on this information, public facility planning can be performed more objectively rather than depending on experts' personal opinions, resulting in effective management of city facilities and maximization of their functional benefits. To systematize this concept, in this study we propose the Accessibility Indicator Model based on previous models.
    We applied this model to public facility planning of public parks and squares which are often donated. Through this model, city facility planning can be presented as a whole picture prior to the development of donated lands; as a result, the following benefits are expected. First, the most demanding public facilities can be provided with priority. Second, companies in charge of the developments can be guided to plan the use of public facilities. Third, authorities in charge of the deliberation or negotiation of the development will be provided with help to make an appropriate and rapid decision. Lastly, expenses due to overlapping functions among facilities will be reduced.
    To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first work to present an objective standards for public facility planning. Our model also has advantage in that it leads to provide public facilities for less developed regions. For further study, more practical models for real world situations are desirable. Specifically, our model can be improved by utilizing more detailed information and can also be more practically utilized by being included in the decision support system of the city planning committee.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
    • 1) 연구의 배경 1
    • 2) 연구의 목적 3
    • 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 4
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
    • 1) 연구의 배경 1
    • 2) 연구의 목적 3
    • 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 4
    • 1) 연구의 범위 4
    • 2) 연구의 방법 6
    • 3) 연구의 구성 8
    • 3. 선행연구의 동향 10
    • Ⅱ. 도시계획시설의 이론적 고찰 13
    • 1. 도시계획시설의 개념 13
    • 2. 도시계획시설의 분류와 종류 18
    • 1) 도시계획시설의 분류 18
    • 2) 도시계획시설의 종류 19
    • 3) 도시계획시설의 지정현황 21
    • 3. 인센티브와 기부채납 25
    • 1) 인센티브의 개관 25
    • 2) 기부채납의 개관 26
    • 4. 도시계획시설의 입지이론 29
    • 1) 연속모형 29
    • 2) 이산모형 32
    • 3) 제반이론들의 평가 34
    • Ⅲ. 서울시 개발계획 수립시 도시계획시설의 확보현황 37
    • 1. 도시계획시설 확보를 위한 제도적 지침 37
    • 2. 사업유형별 도시계획시설의 확보현황 46
    • 3. 기부채납에 의한 도시계획시설 확보의 반성과 평가 47
    • Ⅳ. 접근성 지표모형을 활용한 시설별 서비스수준 51
    • 1. 분석의 틀 51
    • 2. 접근성 지표모형의 구축 52
    • 1) 필지 및 시설의 중심점 좌표산출 52
    • 2) 시설별 서비스범위 산출 56
    • 3) 저항계수의 산출 60
    • 3. 접근성에 근거한 시설지도 작성 65
    • 1) 공원 67
    • 2) 광장 73
    • 4. 접근성 지표모형의 기대효과 76
    • Ⅴ. 결론 78
    • 1. 연구의 종합 78
    • 2. 향후의 연구과제 79
    • 참고문헌 81
    • ABSTRACT 85
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼