RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    교사의 수업설계 전문성 개발을 위한 교육프로그램 개발연구 = Development of Education Program for the Teachers` Instructional Design Expertise

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959549

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the present research was to develop the educational program for teachers`` instructional design expertise. To accomplish this goal, the nature of teachers`` instructional design expertise was identified as expert review and expert-novice comparative research. Based on the nature of teachers`` instructional design expertise, the prototype of educational program was developed and revised by expert review. As a result of the research, instructional design expert emphasized on the fact that the principles and procedure of instructional design model are applied and connected with instruction at school. Experienced teachers reviewed and predicted factors that are influenced by instruction, repeating the instructional design process, and designing instructional strategies that are appropriate to various instructional situations based on his or her experience. Combining the results, they come to make a conclusion that teachers must be adept at applying essential theoretical principles and procedural skills of instructional design to instructional situations flexibly. According to the results, the prototype of educational program was developed and revised by expert review. At the first stage, learning components of the prototype were selected from the results of expert review and expert-novice comparative research. At the second stage, the results of first stage, instructional design model adapted school, and the previous research result from teacher``s instructional design practice were integrated to development of learning components for teacher``s instructional design expertise improvement. At the third stage, learning process was designed to design-action-reflection-learning-redesign based on the experienced teachers`` practice of instructional design and the development of expertise. At the fourth stage, the shortcomings and improvements of prototype``s learning components and process were detected by expert review. Finally, educational programs were developed as a following order the process of pretest, first-design, action(option), reflection, learning & redesign, final design, and reflection.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the present research was to develop the educational program for teachers`` instructional design expertise. To accomplish this goal, the nature of teachers`` instructional design expertise was identified as expert review and expert-novic...

    The purpose of the present research was to develop the educational program for teachers`` instructional design expertise. To accomplish this goal, the nature of teachers`` instructional design expertise was identified as expert review and expert-novice comparative research. Based on the nature of teachers`` instructional design expertise, the prototype of educational program was developed and revised by expert review. As a result of the research, instructional design expert emphasized on the fact that the principles and procedure of instructional design model are applied and connected with instruction at school. Experienced teachers reviewed and predicted factors that are influenced by instruction, repeating the instructional design process, and designing instructional strategies that are appropriate to various instructional situations based on his or her experience. Combining the results, they come to make a conclusion that teachers must be adept at applying essential theoretical principles and procedural skills of instructional design to instructional situations flexibly. According to the results, the prototype of educational program was developed and revised by expert review. At the first stage, learning components of the prototype were selected from the results of expert review and expert-novice comparative research. At the second stage, the results of first stage, instructional design model adapted school, and the previous research result from teacher``s instructional design practice were integrated to development of learning components for teacher``s instructional design expertise improvement. At the third stage, learning process was designed to design-action-reflection-learning-redesign based on the experienced teachers`` practice of instructional design and the development of expertise. At the fourth stage, the shortcomings and improvements of prototype``s learning components and process were detected by expert review. Finally, educational programs were developed as a following order the process of pretest, first-design, action(option), reflection, learning & redesign, final design, and reflection.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 유영만, "탈(脫)-ISD(Post-ISD) 모델의 가능성과발전방향에 대한 비판적 논의" 한국교육공학회 24 (24): 233-269, 2008

    2 임철일, "초등학교 초임 교사를 위한 교수 체제 설계 모형의 개발 연구" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 121-147, 2010

    3 정한호, "초등학교 교사들의 수업설계 실태에 대한 질적 고찰" 한국교육공학회 25 (25): 157-191, 2009

    4 김현주, "철학자로서의 교사 : 교사 전문성의 재개념화" 한국교육철학학회 42 (42): 109-133, 2008

    5 이성흠, "지식기반사회에서 정보?통신기술 활용을 위한 교사의 핵심역량 개발" 한국교원교육학회 20 (20): 203-223, 2003

    6 김도헌, "웹기반형 교수설계자의 전문성 개발을 위한 실천공동체(Community of Practice) 형성방안: 미국 G 대학교의 ‘설계스튜디오’ 사례분석" 한국교육공학회 19 (19): 199-229, 2003

    7 박기용, "숙련된 교사의 수업설계 활동에 토대한 수업설계모형 개발" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 21-52, 2010

    8 유한구, "수업 전문성의 두 측면 : 기술과 이해" 18 (18): 69-84, 2001

    9 안효일, "수업 전문성의 근거 : 지식의 통합성" 한국초등교육학회 20 (20): 119-144, 2007

    10 유영만, "성찰적, 설계 예술적 관점에서 본 수업설계자 육성방안 제고" 12 (12): 113-141, 1996

    1 유영만, "탈(脫)-ISD(Post-ISD) 모델의 가능성과발전방향에 대한 비판적 논의" 한국교육공학회 24 (24): 233-269, 2008

    2 임철일, "초등학교 초임 교사를 위한 교수 체제 설계 모형의 개발 연구" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 121-147, 2010

    3 정한호, "초등학교 교사들의 수업설계 실태에 대한 질적 고찰" 한국교육공학회 25 (25): 157-191, 2009

    4 김현주, "철학자로서의 교사 : 교사 전문성의 재개념화" 한국교육철학학회 42 (42): 109-133, 2008

    5 이성흠, "지식기반사회에서 정보?통신기술 활용을 위한 교사의 핵심역량 개발" 한국교원교육학회 20 (20): 203-223, 2003

    6 김도헌, "웹기반형 교수설계자의 전문성 개발을 위한 실천공동체(Community of Practice) 형성방안: 미국 G 대학교의 ‘설계스튜디오’ 사례분석" 한국교육공학회 19 (19): 199-229, 2003

    7 박기용, "숙련된 교사의 수업설계 활동에 토대한 수업설계모형 개발" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 21-52, 2010

    8 유한구, "수업 전문성의 두 측면 : 기술과 이해" 18 (18): 69-84, 2001

    9 안효일, "수업 전문성의 근거 : 지식의 통합성" 한국초등교육학회 20 (20): 119-144, 2007

    10 유영만, "성찰적, 설계 예술적 관점에서 본 수업설계자 육성방안 제고" 12 (12): 113-141, 1996

    11 이승희, "성찰적 실천의 관점에 비추어 본 수업설계자의 전문성 개발방안 탐색" 8 (8): 173-193, 2002

    12 박기용, "교육실습에서 예비교사의 수업설계 과정에 관한 사례연구" 한국교원교육학회 26 (26): 169-197, 2009

    13 정한호, "교육실습과정에서 나타난 중등 예비교사들의 수업설계 실태" 한국교육과정평가원 12 (12): 1-30, 2009

    14 박기용, "교수설계 모형과 실천 간의 차이와 원인 분석" 한국교육공학회 23 (23): 1-30, 2007

    15 박기용, "교사의 수업계획 과정에 관한 사례연구" 한국교원교육학회 25 (25): 379-405, 2008

    16 정미경, "교사의 교육과정 변화 능력(change capacity) 함양을 위한 적응적 전문성(adaptive expertise) 신장 방안" 교육과학연구소 37 (37): 25-45, 2006

    17 이화자, "교사 전문성 개발의 실천적 사례 비교연구" 글로벌영어교육학회 13 (13): 1-35, 2008

    18 金度憲, "교사 수업계획과정의 실행절차 및 사고과정에 관한 연구 : 수업체제설계이론에 주는 시사점을 중심으로" 漢陽大學校 大學院 1996

    19 소경희, "’교사 전문성’의 재개념화 방향 탐색을 위한 기초연구" 한국교육과정학회 21 (21): 4-96, 2003

    20 김인, "‘학교교육과정’의 재해석: 교사의 역할을 중심으로" 한국교육과정학회 21 (21): 7-384, 2003

    21 Carr-Chellman, A. A., "Whistling in the dark? Instructional design and technology in the schools, In Trend and issues in instructional design and technology" Merrill Prentice Hall 239-255, 2002

    22 Le Maistre, C., "What is an expert instructional designer? Evidence of expert performance during formative evaluation" 46 (46): 21-36, 1998

    23 Rowland. G., "What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice" 5 (5): 65-86, 1992

    24 Richey, R. C., "Validation instructional design and development models, In Innovations in Instructional Technology: Essays in Honor of M. David Merrill" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 171-185, 2005

    25 Sardo-Brown, D., "Twelve middle school teacher's planning" 89 (89): 69-87, 1988

    26 Dick, W., "The systematic design of instruction" Allyn & Bacon 2001

    27 Winer, L. R., "The present and future of ID practice" 8 (8): 55-67, 1995

    28 Nelson, W. A., "The intellectual content of instructional design" 37 (37): 81-94, 1988

    29 Kitsantas, A., "The impact of the instructional planning self-reflective tool on preservice teacher performance, disposition, and self-efficacy beliefs regarding systematic instructional planning" 49 (49): 97-106, 2001

    30 Ertmer, P. A., "Teaching instructional design : An apprenticeship model" 8 (8): 43-58, 1995

    31 Gustafson, K., "Survey of instructional development models" Syracuse University 2002

    32 Clark, C. M., "Second-generation research on teacher's planning, intentions, and routines, In Effective teaching: Current research" McCutchan Publishing Corporation 183-201, 1991

    33 Ertmer, P., "Responsive instructional design : Scaffolding the adoption and change process" 41 (41): 33-38, 2001

    34 Dorsey, L. T., "Rapid collaborative prototyping as an instructional development paradigm, In Instructional Development Paradigm" Educational Technology Publications 445-466, 1997

    35 Klein, J., "Preservice teacher use of learning and instructional design principles" 39 (39): 83-89, 1991

    36 Visscher-Voerman, I., "Paradigms in theory and practice of education and training design" 52 (52): 69-89, 2004

    37 Hannum, W., "Instructional systems development : A 30 year retrospective" 45 (45): 5-21, 2005

    38 Moallem, M., "Instructional systems design and preservice teachers’ processes of thinking, teaching, and planning: What do they learn and how do they change?" 217-232, 1997

    39 Reiser, R. A., "Instructional planning: A guide for teachers" Allyn and Bacon 1996

    40 Ertmer, P. A., "Instructional design expertise : How will we know it when we see it" 45 (45): 38-43, 2005

    41 Jonassen, D. H., "Instructional design as design problem solving : An iterative process" 48 (48): 21-26, 2008

    42 Kerr, S. T., "Inside black box; Making design decision for instruction" 14 (14): 45-58, 1983

    43 Kerr, S. T., "How teachers design their materials : implications for instructional design" 10 : 363-378, 1981

    44 Tripp, S. D., "How should instructional designers be educated?" 7 (7): 116-126, 1994

    45 Ertmer, P. A., "How instructional design experts use knowledge and experience to solve ill-structured problems" 21 (21): 17-42, 2008

    46 Lawson, B., "How designers think" Architectural Press 2006

    47 Reiser, R. A., "Examining the planning practices of teachers : Reflections on three years of research" 34 (34): 11-16, 1994

    48 Rowland, G., "Educating instructional designer : Different method for different outcomes" 34 (34): 5-11, 1994

    49 Young, A. C., "Do superior teachers employ systematic instructional planning procedures? A descriptive study" 46 (46): 65-78, 1998

    50 Richey, R., "Developmental research, In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology" Macmillan 1996

    51 Perez, R. S., "Designer thinking : How novices and experts think about instructional design" 8 (8): 80-95, 1995

    52 Branch, R., "Common instructional design practice employed by secondary school teachers" 34 (34): 25-34, 1994

    53 Leinhardt, G., "Capturing craft knowledge in teaching" 19 (19): 18-25, 1990

    54 Hardre, P. L., "An investigation of development toward instructional design expertise" 19 (19): 63-90, 2006

    55 Ericsson, K. A., "An introduction to cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance: Its development, organization, and content, In The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance" Cambridge University Press 3-19, 2006

    56 Moallem, M., "An expert teacher's thinking and teaching and instructional design models and principles : An ethnographic study" 46 (46): 37-64, 1998

    57 Reiser, R. A., "An examination of the planning practices of two experienced teachers" 39 (39): 71-82, 1991

    58 김평국, "After Typer: 교육과정 이론화 1970-2000년" 문음사 2006

    59 Brantley-Dias. L., "A practical design model for novice teachers" 47 (47): 33-38, 2007

    60 McCutcheon, G., "A contemporary study of teacher planning in a highschool english class" 8 (8): 81-94, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼