민주적 헌법체계하에서의 합법성과 정당성 문제

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Under the democratic Constitution it is necessary to judge legal legitimacy at every stage in legal realization. It is not the exclusive property of the judiciary but rather the prerequisite for legislation process, administrative policy judgement and law-abiding individuals as well.
The Constitutional Court understandably has decided that due process of law means not only procedural due precess but also substantive due process in the past. In everywhere, however, there are enormous logical inconsistencies.
The judgement of the Constitutional Court on legitimacy is to guarantee constitutional values at a minimum rather than force into maximizing social ideals. The Constitutional Court, therefore, should not avoid judging the legitimacy. Also, we should not afraid to think about having legitimacy to comply with the law.
State power is expected to do legally with legitimacy. We should not formalize the legitimacy as constitutional values. In any case, a major infraction of legitimacy is a major illegality and a minor violation of legitimacy is just a minor illegality. Therefore, it can be said that there is only the minor illegal state power with minor violation of legitimacy. We should not approve unjustified but legal state power.
'Legality without legitimacy' is illegal. Equally, 'legitimacy without legality' is meaningless. Consequently, legality and legitimacy have a distinct meaning, but those can be described as a concept which should only rely on each other. I argue that this point of view will lead us to realize the democratic Constitution.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Leibholz, Gerhard, "현대민주정치론" 서문당 1977

2 "헌재 2014. 8. 28. 2012헌바433 결정"

3 "헌재 2008. 5. 29. 2005헌라3 결정"

4 "헌재 2002. 5. 30. 2001헌바28 결정"

5 "헌재 1999. 5. 27. 98헌마214 결정"

6 "헌재 1992. 2. 25. 89헌가104 결정"

7 "헌재 1992. 12. 24. 92헌가8 결정"

8 Schmitt, Carl, "헌법의 수호자 논쟁" 1991

9 홍정선, "행정법원론(하)" 박영사 2009

10 김남진, "행정법(Ⅱ)" 법문사 2005

11 Schmitt, Carl, "합법성과 정당성" 교육과학사 1993

12 양건, "한국공법이론의 새로운 전개" 삼지원 2005

13 박윤흔, "최신 행정법강의(하)" 국민서관 1990

14 윤세창, "증보 행정법요론" 청구문화사 1952

15 Sandel, Michael, "정의란 무엇인가" 김영사 2010

16 Kelsen, Hans, "정의란 무엇인가" 삼중당 1995

17 Höffe, Otfried, "정의" 이제이북스 2004

18 김욱, "자연법은 헌법적 효력을 갖는가?" 한국헌법학회 19 (19): 123-151, 2013

19 석종현, "일반행정법(하)" 삼영사 1995

20 이상규, "신행정법론(하)" 법문사 1991

21 김도창, "신고 일반 행정법론(하)" 청운사 1981

22 최관호, "명령과 복종의무의 형법규범적 내용과 한계 : 「군형법」 제44조 항명죄를 중심으로" 건국대학교 대학원 2008

23 김욱, "마키아벨리즘으로 읽는 한국 헌정사" 책세상 2003

24 "대법원 2012. 11. 29. 선고 2010도1233 판결"

25 "대법원 2012. 10. 11. 선고 2012두10895 판결"

26 "대법원 2010. 4. 22. 선고 2008다38288 판결"

27 "대법원 2009. 1. 30. 선고 2008도6950 판결"

28 "대법원 2007. 3. 22. 선고 2005추62 판결"

29 이계수, "공무원의 복종의무의 내용 및 한계에 대한 규범적, 행정법사회학적 연구" 민주주의법학연구회 (40) : 125-171, 2009

30 "공동번역 개정판"

31 "고등군사법원 2009. 11. 17. 선고 2008노275 판결"

32 Locke, John, "Two Treatises of Government" Cambridge University Press 1970

33 Minow, Martha, "The Politics of Law" Basic Books 1998

34 Williams, Ryan C., "The One and Only Substantive Due Process Clause" 120 (120): 2010

35 Marx, Karl, "Marx and Engel on Law" Academic Press 1979

36 Engels, Friedrich, "Marx and Engel on Law" Academic Press 1979

37 Marx, Karl, "Marx and Engel on Law" Academic Press 1979

38 Fallon, Jr., Richard H., "Legitimacy and the Constitution" 118 (118): 2005

39 Orth, John V., "Due Process of Law: A Brief History" University of Kansas 2003

40 Willis, Hugh Evander, "Due Process of Law Under the United States Constitution" 74 (74): 1926