RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    도시계획의 변경으로 인한 개발이익 환수 — 용도지역 상향을 중심으로 — = Return of development gains due to changes in urban planning — Focusing on up-zoning —

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108737035

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The country needs to flexibly adjust land use through changes in urban planning according to social development and industrial changes. When building permits are newly granted or building permit requirements are eased due to changes in urban planning, the objective use value of the land increases. It has become a subject of social debate whether it is reasonable for the development gains generated by this to belong only to the landowner. As a result, the contents of the subject, method, standard the return of development gains were determined through legislative policy. Korea has various development gains return systems under the public law. They are public contribution, development levy, and reconstruction levy. Each system is operated individually, so there is a certain limit to the systematic return of development gains resulting from urban planning changes. In particular, in view of the gradual increase in demand for up-zoning, it is urgent to reorganize the system to properly return the development gains resulting from urban planning change.
    Under the current public law, the development gains return system recognizes a mutually complementary relationship in each phase and is similar in nature, so it is necessary to unify the conceptual system of development gains and link and reorganize each system. The return of development gains due to urban planning changes is determined at the urban planning change phase in the case of public contribution and at the project completion phase in the case of development levy. In addition, the nature of development levy and reconstruction levy can be seen to be similar, considering that the development gains to be returned are derived from development of land, that is, the change in urban planning. If so, the concept of development gains under the Development Gains Return Act is defined as the increase in land use value that belongs to the landowner or implementer of development project due to a change in urban planning or implementation of the development project for the target land. This is a reasonable adjustment of the conceptual elements of development gains. Based on this conceptual system, the concept of development gains returned as public contribution and reconstruction levy can also be determined and operated in an integrated manner. This will help to increase the effectiveness of the development gains return system by establishing a simple, consistent and dense return network. Landowners can also get opportunities for various development projects that can be more easily accepted by society through the return of development gains.
    번역하기

    The country needs to flexibly adjust land use through changes in urban planning according to social development and industrial changes. When building permits are newly granted or building permit requirements are eased due to changes in urban planning,...

    The country needs to flexibly adjust land use through changes in urban planning according to social development and industrial changes. When building permits are newly granted or building permit requirements are eased due to changes in urban planning, the objective use value of the land increases. It has become a subject of social debate whether it is reasonable for the development gains generated by this to belong only to the landowner. As a result, the contents of the subject, method, standard the return of development gains were determined through legislative policy. Korea has various development gains return systems under the public law. They are public contribution, development levy, and reconstruction levy. Each system is operated individually, so there is a certain limit to the systematic return of development gains resulting from urban planning changes. In particular, in view of the gradual increase in demand for up-zoning, it is urgent to reorganize the system to properly return the development gains resulting from urban planning change.
    Under the current public law, the development gains return system recognizes a mutually complementary relationship in each phase and is similar in nature, so it is necessary to unify the conceptual system of development gains and link and reorganize each system. The return of development gains due to urban planning changes is determined at the urban planning change phase in the case of public contribution and at the project completion phase in the case of development levy. In addition, the nature of development levy and reconstruction levy can be seen to be similar, considering that the development gains to be returned are derived from development of land, that is, the change in urban planning. If so, the concept of development gains under the Development Gains Return Act is defined as the increase in land use value that belongs to the landowner or implementer of development project due to a change in urban planning or implementation of the development project for the target land. This is a reasonable adjustment of the conceptual elements of development gains. Based on this conceptual system, the concept of development gains returned as public contribution and reconstruction levy can also be determined and operated in an integrated manner. This will help to increase the effectiveness of the development gains return system by establishing a simple, consistent and dense return network. Landowners can also get opportunities for various development projects that can be more easily accepted by society through the return of development gains.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 성낙인, "헌법학, 제21판" 법문사 2021

    2 홍정선, "행정법원론(하), 제29판" 박영사 2021

    3 박균성, "행정법론(하), 제21판" 박영사 2023

    4 김동희, "행정법Ⅱ, 제25판" 박영사 2019

    5 김종보, "토지형질변경허가의 법적 성질" 한국행정판례연구회 11 : 383-422, 2006

    6 이선영, "토지재산권의 가치보장과 개발이익 환수의 한계 -개발부담금제도를 중심으로-" 한국토지법학회 26 (26): 189-224, 2010

    7 정희남, "토지에 대한 개발이익환수제도의 개편방안" 국토연구원 2003

    8 이정전, "토지문제에 대한 4가지 패러다임" (43) : 2005

    9 이우진, "토지공개념과 개발이익환수제" 동북아법연구소 12 (12): 285-318, 2018

    10 허영, "토지거래허가제의 헌법상 문제점" 1989

    1 성낙인, "헌법학, 제21판" 법문사 2021

    2 홍정선, "행정법원론(하), 제29판" 박영사 2021

    3 박균성, "행정법론(하), 제21판" 박영사 2023

    4 김동희, "행정법Ⅱ, 제25판" 박영사 2019

    5 김종보, "토지형질변경허가의 법적 성질" 한국행정판례연구회 11 : 383-422, 2006

    6 이선영, "토지재산권의 가치보장과 개발이익 환수의 한계 -개발부담금제도를 중심으로-" 한국토지법학회 26 (26): 189-224, 2010

    7 정희남, "토지에 대한 개발이익환수제도의 개편방안" 국토연구원 2003

    8 이정전, "토지문제에 대한 4가지 패러다임" (43) : 2005

    9 이우진, "토지공개념과 개발이익환수제" 동북아법연구소 12 (12): 285-318, 2018

    10 허영, "토지거래허가제의 헌법상 문제점" 1989

    11 허지인 ; 김종보, "지구단위계획과 공공기여의 산정" 행정법이론실무학회 (67) : 137-162, 2022

    12 길준규, "재건축 개발이익환수제도의 법적 문제" 한국비교공법학회 7 (7): 47-76, 2006

    13 성소미, "재건축 개발이익환수에 관한 법적 쟁점" 한국토지공법학회 31 : 1-28, 2006

    14 김웅, "재건축 개발이익 환수제도의 헌법적 의의와 그 한계" 고려대학교 2021

    15 김나래, "부동산 개발이익 환수에 관한 법적 고찰" 한국부동산법학회 25 (25): 49-72, 2021

    16 정해영, "법치행정의 원리와 공공기여금" 법학연구소 10 (10): 198-220, 2017

    17 김종보, "도시계획의 핵심기능과 지적제도의 충돌 ― 건축단위와 건축허용성을 중심으로 ―" 행정법이론실무학회 16 : 55-81, 2006

    18 김종보, "도시계획변경거부의 처분성" 행정법이론실무학회 11 : 243-272, 2004

    19 송시강, "공법상 부담금에 관한 연구 ― 재원조달책임에 있어서 평등원칙 ―" 행정법이론실무학회 (57) : 93-139, 2019

    20 이형찬, "계획이익 조정체계 정비에 관한 연구" 국토연구원 2016

    21 김종보, "건축허용성의 부여와 반영" 법학연구소 53 (53): 145-173, 2012

    22 김종보, "건설법의 이해, 제7판" 북포레 2023

    23 유해웅, "개발이익환수제도의 발전적 전개를 위한 고찰" 9 : 2000

    24 이춘원, "개발이익환수에 관한 검토" 한국부동산법학회 21 (21): 129-159, 2017

    25 김종보, "개발사업에서 국공유지의 법적 지위" 행정법이론실무학회 (57) : 1-24, 2019

    26 허지인, "개발사업법상 공공시설에 관한 공법적 연구" 서울대학교 2020

    27 김남욱, "개발부담금제도에 관한 고찰" 10 : 2000

    28 차진아, "개발부담금의 법적 성격에 관한 헌법재판소 판례의 분석과 평가" 비교법학연구소 59 : 155-206, 2020

    29 신정규, "개발부담금의 법적 성격과 우선징수권에 관한 고찰 - 헌법재판소 2016. 6. 30. 2013헌바191, 2014헌바473 (병합) -" 한국토지공법학회 76 : 131-156, 2016

    30 최진수, "개발부담금의 법적 성격과 그 합헌성 심사기준에 관한 고찰" 한국공법학회 49 (49): 535-560, 2020

    31 Department of Communities and Local Government, "Section 106 Afffordable Housing Requirement Review and Appeal" 2013

    32 Michael Purdue, "A Practical Approach to Planning Law 14th Edition" Oxford University Press 2019

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼