RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      유아와 초등학생을 대상으로 한 프로젝트 접근법의 효과에 대한 메타 분석 = (A) Meta-Analysis on effectiveness of the preschool children and the elementary school children's project approach

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9432170

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        대구 : 경북대학교 대학원, 2004

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 경북대학교 대학원 , 아동가족학과 , 2004. 8

      • 발행연도

        2004

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        375.2325 판사항(4)

      • DDC

        372.136 판사항(22)

      • 발행국(도시)

        대구

      • 형태사항

        v, 89p. : 삽도 ; 26cm.

      • 일반주기명

        권말부록수록
        참고문헌: p. 73-78

      • 소장기관
        • 경북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to synthesize quantitatively the effectiveness of project approach by meta-analysis. Basically, meta analysis is a statistical analysis of the summary findings of many empirical studies. For this study, After review of 51 studies, This study calculated the effect size of 119 from 1990 to 2002. The data were analysed using SAS 8.2. The result of the study are as follows:
      First, The grand average degree of effect of the project approach effectiveness proposed in this study turned out to be 1.03. This means that if the grand average size of effects of the teaching-learning effectiveness centered unit of the controlled group is 50 percentile in the normal distribution, that of the project approach effectiveness of the experimental group becomes 85 percentile. As it were, the latter surpass the former by 35.
      Second, among the preschool children and elementary school children' project approach proposed in this study, preschool children showed higher average effect size than elementary school children, its average effect size being 1.21. And elementary school children showed average effect size is .88.
      Third, in the children, the variable of learning showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.87. And the variable of mathematics showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being .48. In the elementary school children, the variable of creativity showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.13. And the variable of science showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being .43.
      Fourth, ① In the preschool children, the variable of 13-16 weeks showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 2.17. And the variable of 1-4 weeks showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.00. In the elementary school children, the variable of 13-16 weeks showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.87. And the variable of 1-4 weeks showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being .53.
      ② In the preschool children, the variable of 1-10 subjects showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 3.21. And the variable of 11-20 subjects showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.08. In the elementary school children, the variable of 11-20 subjects showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.45. And the variable of 31-40 subjects showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being .68.
      ③ In the preschool children, the variable of topics related arts showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 2.28. And the variable of topics related disorders showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being .74. In the elementary school children, the variable of topics related society showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.38. And the variable of topics related everyday life showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being .73.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to synthesize quantitatively the effectiveness of project approach by meta-analysis. Basically, meta analysis is a statistical analysis of the summary findings of many empirical studies. For this study, After review of 51 ...

      The purpose of this study is to synthesize quantitatively the effectiveness of project approach by meta-analysis. Basically, meta analysis is a statistical analysis of the summary findings of many empirical studies. For this study, After review of 51 studies, This study calculated the effect size of 119 from 1990 to 2002. The data were analysed using SAS 8.2. The result of the study are as follows:
      First, The grand average degree of effect of the project approach effectiveness proposed in this study turned out to be 1.03. This means that if the grand average size of effects of the teaching-learning effectiveness centered unit of the controlled group is 50 percentile in the normal distribution, that of the project approach effectiveness of the experimental group becomes 85 percentile. As it were, the latter surpass the former by 35.
      Second, among the preschool children and elementary school children' project approach proposed in this study, preschool children showed higher average effect size than elementary school children, its average effect size being 1.21. And elementary school children showed average effect size is .88.
      Third, in the children, the variable of learning showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.87. And the variable of mathematics showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being .48. In the elementary school children, the variable of creativity showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.13. And the variable of science showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being .43.
      Fourth, ① In the preschool children, the variable of 13-16 weeks showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 2.17. And the variable of 1-4 weeks showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.00. In the elementary school children, the variable of 13-16 weeks showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.87. And the variable of 1-4 weeks showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being .53.
      ② In the preschool children, the variable of 1-10 subjects showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 3.21. And the variable of 11-20 subjects showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.08. In the elementary school children, the variable of 11-20 subjects showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.45. And the variable of 31-40 subjects showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being .68.
      ③ In the preschool children, the variable of topics related arts showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 2.28. And the variable of topics related disorders showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being .74. In the elementary school children, the variable of topics related society showed the highest average effect size, its average effect size being 1.38. And the variable of topics related everyday life showed the lowest average effect size, its average effect size being .73.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = i
      • 표목차 = iii
      • 그림목차 = v
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 목적 및 필요성 = 1
      • 목차 = i
      • 표목차 = iii
      • 그림목차 = v
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 목적 및 필요성 = 1
      • 2. 연구문제 = 7
      • 3. 용어 정의 = 9
      • 4. 연구의 제한점 = 11
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 12
      • 1. 프로젝트 접근법 = 12
      • 1) 프로젝트 접근법의 역사 = 12
      • 2) 프로젝트 접근법의 목적 = 15
      • 3) 프로젝트 접근법의 특성 = 16
      • 4) 프로젝트 접근법의 전개 = 18
      • 5) 프로젝트 접근법의 연구 동향에 대한 분석(선행연구 분석) = 23
      • 2. 메타 분석 = 24
      • 1) 메타 분석의 필요성 및 목적 = 24
      • 2) 메타 분석의 선행 연구 = 26
      • 3) 메타 분석의 절차 = 29
      • 4) 효과 크기(Effect Size)의 계산 공식 = 30
      • 5) 평균 효과크기 = 32
      • 6) 효과크기의 해석 = 33
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 = 35
      • 1. 연구 대상 = 35
      • 2. 자료 처리 및 분석 = 35
      • 3. 타당도와 신뢰도 = 37
      • Ⅳ. 연구결과 = 38
      • 1. 연구특성별 효과크기의 수 = 38
      • 2. 개별 연구물의 특징 = 39
      • 3. 연구결과 및 해석 = 46
      • Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론 = 64
      • 1. 논의 = 64
      • 2. 결론 = 71
      • 참고문헌 = 73
      • (Abstract) = 79
      • 부록 = 81
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼