동해안지역 신석기시대 조기 토기 편년과 양식의 변용과정 = Chronology and Stylistic Change in the Incipient Neolithic Pottery of the East Coast

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this paper is to address the issue of chronology for the potteryof the Incipient Neolithic Period and to closely examine the style changesthat occurred by looking at decorative patterns, vessel form, and productionmethods.
Chronological units were established and the relationship between thechronological units was examined by reviewing the features of pottery fromthe different layers of Incipient Neolithic sites located along the East Coast ofKorea. Based on this, a six stage chronology was established for the potteryof the Incipient Neolithic Period. The chronology of the pottery from IncipientNeolithic sites of the East Coast were divided into the early phase (Stages 1 &2), the middle phase (Stages 3, 4 & 5), and the later phase (Stage 6) based onthe ratio of patternless pottery, the typicality of stamped-pattern ware, and thecommon occurrence with raised-pattern ware. It was deemed inappropriate toattribute the ‘later phase’ to the Early Neolithic Period given that a clear link withthe previous stage existed and a great deal of raised-pattern ware was yielded.
To closely examine stylistic change, a comprehensive review of decorationpattern, vessel form, and production methods was conducted. In the middlephase of the period, a coexistence between plain/stamped-pattern ware andraised-pattern ware could be observed, but with no influence exerted on oneanother. In contrast, it can be suggested that the later phase of the this periodshould be regarded not as being represented by raised-pattern ware (in whichthere are some eclectic types of pottery) but as a stage in which, with thedecline of Osan-ri style pottery, plain pottery gained a greater foothold, and theDongsam-dong style came to be adopted as a pattern element. To be specific,the later phase of this period demonstrates an across-the-board combinationbetween the Osan-ri and Dongsam-dong styles. Describing this merely as an a sort of compromise between the two styles, and regarding this stage asbeing one led by raised-pattern ware may serve to diminish the significanceof the change that occurred in terms of pottery style. Therefore, it should beappropriate to view the later phase of the Incipient Neolithic Period of the EastCoast as a time period in which a transition from the coexistence of two differentpottery styles to a true fusion between the two came to take place.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 田中聰一, "한반도 중남부지방 신석기시대 토기문화연구" 동아대학교대학원 2001

2 임상택, "한반도 신석기시대 토기 양식의 성립과 변동" 중부고고학회 16 (16): 39-102, 2017

3 고동순, "한반도 신석기시대 지역문화론" 2009

4 하인수, "한국 신석기문화의 양상과 전개" 2012

5 金壯錫, "오산리토기의 연구 : 상대편년 및 타지역과의 관계" 서울大學校 大學院 1991

6 이소라, "오산리식토기 편년 연구 —오산리A지구의 층서를 중심으로—" 동국대학교대학원 2017

7 최종혁, "신석기시대 동해안지방의 토기문화에 대한 연구" 동아시아문물연구학술재단 05 (05): 59-76, 2001

8 하인수, "부산광역시립박물관연구논집 3" 1995

9 하인수, "문암리유적의 즐문토기 분류와 편년 검토" 한국고고학회 (95) : 4-31, 2015

10 정연주, "동해안지역 신석기시대 조기 토기 편년과 양식의 변용과정" 부산대학교대학원 2019

11 임상택, "동·남해안 지역의 신석기시대 조기 토기 양식 - 죽변 유적을 중심으로 -" 한국신석기학회 (24) : 1-30, 2012

12 장은혜, "남부지역 신석기시대 조·전기토기 전환과정 연구" 부산대학교 대학원 2013

13 복천박물관, "기술의 발견" 2003

14 김은영, "고성 문암리유적을 통해 본 신석기시대 평저토기문화의 전개" 국립문화재연구소 (40) : 169-205, 2007

15 서울대학교박물관, "鰲山里遺蹟 III" 1988

16 서울대학교박물관, "鰲山里遺蹟 II" 1985

17 서울대학교박물관, "鰲山里遺蹟" 1984

18 國立文化財硏究所, "高城 文岩里遺蹟" 2004

19 李東注, "韓國 先史時代 南海岸 有文土器 연구" 東亞大學校 大學院 1997

20 다나카 소이치, "韓國 中東部地方 新石器時代 土器에 대하여 - 襄陽 鰲山里遺蹟出土 鰲山里式土器의 檢討를 中心으로" 동아시아문물연구학술재단 04 (04): 3-40, 2000

21 예맥문화재연구원, "襄陽 鰲山里遺蹟" 2010

22 삼한문화재연구원, "蔚珍 竹邊里 遺蹟" 2012

23 삼한문화재연구원, "蔚珍 竹邊里 15-68번지 遺蹟" 2015

24 김은영, "石軒 鄭澄元敎授 停年退任紀念論叢" 2006

25 안승모, "江原都事 역사편" 1995

26 하인수, "東海岸地域 隆起文土器의 檢討" 한국고고학회 (79) : 5-38, 2011

27 小林達雄, "日本原始美術大系 1" 1977

28 하인수, "南部地域 櫛文土器의 樣式과 型式 문제" 한국신석기학회 (25) : 67-103, 2013