대학 캠퍼스 경관요소 평가에 관한 연구 : 캠퍼스 유형별 만족도 및 이미지 평가를 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper is aimed for analyzing satisfaction and image about each type of landscape elements by typological approach of university campuses. The design elements of landscape improvement in campus were extracted from correlation analysis of satisfaction and image of campus. Conclusions from analysis above are as below.

1. Analysis of campus types

1) Three types were extracted by using spatial index of campus. From feature analysis of each types, three types are classified as below. Type 1 is ‘large-scale complex location’ type, and Type 2 is ‘middle-scale edge location’ type. Finally, Type 3 is small-scale urban location type.
2) Three universities are selected for investigation. The type 1 is Kyung-buk University(A-University), and the type 2 is Kumoh National Institute of Technology(B-University), and the type 3 is Dae-gu Educational University(C-University).

2. Landscape element evaluation in Architecture

1) The headquarter building of university is shown as a representative case of the university buildings. The main reasons are 'History of the building' and 'Good location'. Among elements in architectural formation, ‘Proportion & Balance' and ’Harmony & Order', are shown as very important factors. The same pattern were shown at all three cases.
2) Satisfaction level of landscape elements in architecture is high at 'Building layout' in all cases. However, satisfaction level is very low at ‘Building color & materials’. Therefore, organizing ‘Building color & materials’ is the main task for landscape development.
3) Satisfaction level of the headquarter building is higer than buildings overall. Satisfaction level of A and C-University shows high in ‘Building formation’, and C-University shows high in ‘Building layout’.
4) Image evaluation in architecture is a little bit different. Most universities show that image about 'Nobility‘ is positive, and image about 'Dynamic' is extremely negative. Therefore, giving a dynamic image is important during architecture design.
5) In cases of the headquarter building, A-University shows positive in ‘Scale’, and B and C-University shows positive in ‘Nobility’, respectively. These results shows the relations between image evaluation of the campus and the headquarter building.
6) The correlation between satisfaction and image of landscape elements shows that A-University has positive correlation with ‘Building color & Materials’, B-University has positive correlation with 'Building color & Materials’ and 'Building formation'. Therefore, the main task for landscape improvement in campus is to focus on these elements at each campus.
3. Landscape element evaluation in Outdoor space

1) In all three cases, 'Rest area' and 'Water area‘ as parts of campus outdoor space were considered as main landscape elements, and satisfaction level of those elements were high as well. 'University Entrance' was considered as a main landscape element but satisfaction level was low.
2) In outdoor space of three cases, elements with low satisfaction level were as follows. In A-University, Street Furniture Group, in B-University, Symbol․Entrance Facility Group, and in C-University, all of Facility Groups show low satisfaction level respectively. These are connected with environment condition that each university has.
3) Satisfaction level of ‘Planting area’ shows high in ‘Visibility’, and low in ‘Activity’. 'University Entrance' shows high in ‘Visibility’, and low in ‘Semanticity’. These results shows differently in each case.
4) Image about the overall university is positive at all elements except 'Scale‘ and 'Dynamic', and especially very positive at 'Familiarity'.
5) Image about 'Planting area' shows positive in all elements except 'Scale‘, and 'University Entrance' shows negative in all elements except 'Dynamic’. In case of 'University Entrance', A and C-University shows negative in all elements except 'Dynamic’ and 'Clarity’. In contrast, B -University shows positive in all elements except 'Dynamic’ and 'Clarity’. It is showed that the landscape charactieristics of each cases are reflected on these results.
6) The correlation of between satisfaction and image of landscape elements shows that A-University has positive correlation with 'Street Furniture Group‘ and 'Symbol․Enterance Facility Group’, C-University has positive correlation with 'Landscaping Facility Group‘. Therefore, the main task for landscape improvement in campus is to organize these facilities at each campus.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目 次
• Abstract ⅰ
• 目 次 ⅳ
• 그림차례 ⅷ
• 표 차 례 ⅹ
• 사진차례 ⅻ
• 第 1 章 序 論 1
• 1.1 硏究의 背景 및 目的 1
• 1.1.1 硏究의 背景 1
• 1.1.2 硏究의 目的 2
• 1.2 硏究의 範圍 및 方法 3
• 1.2.1 硏究의 範圍 3
• 1.2.2 硏究의 方法 4
• 1.2.3 硏究問題 및 模型設定 6
• 1.3 先行硏究 考察 8
• 1.4 用語의 定義 12
• 1.5 論文의 構成 14
• 第 2 章 理論的 考察 15
• 2.1 大學캠퍼스의 槪念 및 機能 15
• 2.1.1 大學캠퍼스의 槪念 15
• 2.1.2 大學캠퍼스의 機能 18
• 2.2 大學캠퍼스의 構成要素 및 類型 24
• 2.2.1 大學캠퍼스의 構成要素 24
• 2.2.2 大學캠퍼스의 類型 26
• 2.3 景觀의 槪念 및 構成要素 32
• 2.3.1 景觀의 槪念 32
• 2.3.2 景觀의 構成要素 37
• 2.4 이미지 構成要素 39
• 2.4.1 環境知覺과 이미지 39
• 2.4.2 이미지의 役割과 構成要素 44
• 第 3 章 大學캠퍼스의 類型化 및 特性 分析 50
• 3.1 大學캠퍼스 類型化 分析 50
• 3.1.1 大學캠퍼스 類型化 意義 및 方法 50
• 3.1.2 類型化 分析 51
• 3.1.3 類型化 特性 分析 55
• 3.1.4 類型別 空間的 特性 61
• 3.2 調査對象 大學의 特性 64
• 3.2.1 캠퍼스 槪要 64
• 3.2.2 大學別 環境的 特性 67
• 第 4 章 建築物 景觀要素에 관한 評價 81
• 4.1 本 章의 視點과 調査槪要 81
• 4.1.1 調査 槪要 81
• 4.1.2 調査對象者의 一般的 特性 81
• 4.1.3 豫備調査에 의한 建築物 認知度 分析 83
• 4.2 指標地物의 建築 形態的 要素 分析 84
• 4.2.1 指標地物로 대표되는 建築物 및 選定 이유 84
• 4.2.2 指標地物에 대한 建築 形態的 要素의 重要度 評價 89
• 4.3 建築物 景觀要素에 대한 滿足度 評價 91
• 4.3.1 전체 建築物에 대한 景觀要素 滿足度 評價 92
• 4.3.2 주요 建築物別 景觀要素 滿足度 評價 94
• 4.4 建築物에 대한 이미지 評價 97
• 4.4.1 이미지 評價 指標選定 및 評價方法 97
• 4.4.2 이미지 評價指標에 의한 心理量 分析 98
• 4.4.3 因子分析에 의한 이미지 評價 103
• 4.5 建築物 景觀要素 滿足度와 이미지 評價와의 相關關係 分析 110
• 4.6 小 結 112
• 第 5 章 外部空間 景觀要素에 관한 評價 114
• 5.1 本 章의 視點과 調査 槪要 114
• 5.1.1 調査 槪要 114
• 5.1.2 豫備調査에 의한 認知度 分析 114
• 5.2 外部空間의 景觀要素 評價 115
• 5.2.1 主要 景觀要素로 認識되는 施設物 116
• 5.2.2 外部空間 景觀要素의 滿足度 評價 117
• 5.2.3 認識構造와 滿足度 評價와의 相關分析 123
• 5.3 外部空間에 대한 이미지 評價 124
• 5.3.1 이미지 評價指標에 의한 心理量 分析 124
• 5.3.2 因子分析에 의한 이미지 評價 130
• 5.4 景觀要素 滿足度와 이미지 評價와의 相關分析 138
• 5.5 小 結 141
• 第 6 章 結論 및 提言 143
• 6.1 各 章에서 얻어진 結果의 要約 143
• 6.1.1 類型化에 관한 分析 143
• 6.1.2 建築物 景觀要素 評價 144
• 6.1.3 外部空間 景觀要素 評價 146
• 6.2 캠퍼스 景觀整備에 대한 提言 147
• 6.2.1 建築物 景觀整備 提言 147
• 6.2.2 外部空間 景觀整備 提言 148
• 6.3 硏究의 限界와 今後의 課題 149
• 參考文獻 150
• 附 錄 157
• 附錄 1. 國立大學 施設現況 158
• 附錄 2. 각 大學 類型化를 위한 空間現況 161
• 附錄 3. 大學別 空間的 指標(標準化 Data) 163
• 설문지 1. 대학캠퍼스 建築物 및 外部空間 인지도에 관한 調査表 164
• 설문지 2. 대학캠퍼스 建築物 및 外部空間 評價에 관한 調査表 168
• 설문지 3. 대학캠퍼스 建築物 및 外部空間 評價에 관한 調査表 173