RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      AI 창작물의 저작권 보호는 필요한가 = Is copyright protection needed for AI creations?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109130249

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      It is the era of artificial intelligence. Technological innovation, which has been a constant driving force for the growth of mankind, has emerged a new type of technology called artificial intelligence. With the development of digital and information and communication technologies, artificial intelligence technology has opened the horizon of the new era of the 4th industrial revolution and provided many conveniences to mankind.
      Meanwhile, artificial intelligence has taken human life to the next level and presented humanity with numerous legal challenges. The problem of artificial intelligence creations is also a representative example of this. Artificial intelligence, which has been developing over and over, has expanded its scope to the realm of creation, which was said to be the exclusive property of mankind, and has caused problems with copyright and responsibility, bringing about a great impact on the human intellectual property system.
      Looking at this situation, this paper was written to find a way to achieve harmony with the human intellectual property system by regulating and protecting artificial intelligence creations within the copyright field, and the results of the study are as follows. First, although various artificial intelligence creations are produced, it was confirmed that artificial intelligence creations are in a legal blank state under the current intellectual property system. Since it is not recognized as a work under the copyright law, it is not possible to regulate them within the current legislation governing human creation. As a result of examining their need for protection, it may be contradictory, but it was concluded that artificial intelligence creations need to be regulated within the current legal system for human creation. Even considering the purpose of the Copyright Act, which is the protection of human creations and the development of related industries, the necessity of regulation and protection can be recognized. However, in order to protect artificial intelligence creations, numerous issues of copyright law, such as the issue of copyrightability of creations, copyright attribution, and protection method, must be decided in the current legislation. Considering that artificial intelligence cannot be a subject of rights and obligations at present and the current technological ability to create creations without human intervention, the subject of rights of creations should be human. Based on this, the constitutional approach to the knowledge and information society as a protection measure, “introduction of electronic personality” to prepare for the upcoming era of strong artificial intelligence, legal improvements such as “Amendment of Copyright Act” and “Enactment of Special Act on Artificial Intelligence” as a way to realize the recognition of copyright and the establishment of authors, and the production of “Ethical Guidelines” as a concrete system, the registration system as a technical indication obligation, and external measures were proposed. However, since these measures also attempt a legal approach to artificial intelligence from the beginning, social consensus should be reached through further discussion on their concrete realization measures.
      Regardless of the field, artificial intelligence will create new legal issues in a completely different way than before. Now, we must start an in-depth discussion to present a new paradigm to respond to new issues in artificial intelligence.
      번역하기

      It is the era of artificial intelligence. Technological innovation, which has been a constant driving force for the growth of mankind, has emerged a new type of technology called artificial intelligence. With the development of digital and information...

      It is the era of artificial intelligence. Technological innovation, which has been a constant driving force for the growth of mankind, has emerged a new type of technology called artificial intelligence. With the development of digital and information and communication technologies, artificial intelligence technology has opened the horizon of the new era of the 4th industrial revolution and provided many conveniences to mankind.
      Meanwhile, artificial intelligence has taken human life to the next level and presented humanity with numerous legal challenges. The problem of artificial intelligence creations is also a representative example of this. Artificial intelligence, which has been developing over and over, has expanded its scope to the realm of creation, which was said to be the exclusive property of mankind, and has caused problems with copyright and responsibility, bringing about a great impact on the human intellectual property system.
      Looking at this situation, this paper was written to find a way to achieve harmony with the human intellectual property system by regulating and protecting artificial intelligence creations within the copyright field, and the results of the study are as follows. First, although various artificial intelligence creations are produced, it was confirmed that artificial intelligence creations are in a legal blank state under the current intellectual property system. Since it is not recognized as a work under the copyright law, it is not possible to regulate them within the current legislation governing human creation. As a result of examining their need for protection, it may be contradictory, but it was concluded that artificial intelligence creations need to be regulated within the current legal system for human creation. Even considering the purpose of the Copyright Act, which is the protection of human creations and the development of related industries, the necessity of regulation and protection can be recognized. However, in order to protect artificial intelligence creations, numerous issues of copyright law, such as the issue of copyrightability of creations, copyright attribution, and protection method, must be decided in the current legislation. Considering that artificial intelligence cannot be a subject of rights and obligations at present and the current technological ability to create creations without human intervention, the subject of rights of creations should be human. Based on this, the constitutional approach to the knowledge and information society as a protection measure, “introduction of electronic personality” to prepare for the upcoming era of strong artificial intelligence, legal improvements such as “Amendment of Copyright Act” and “Enactment of Special Act on Artificial Intelligence” as a way to realize the recognition of copyright and the establishment of authors, and the production of “Ethical Guidelines” as a concrete system, the registration system as a technical indication obligation, and external measures were proposed. However, since these measures also attempt a legal approach to artificial intelligence from the beginning, social consensus should be reached through further discussion on their concrete realization measures.
      Regardless of the field, artificial intelligence will create new legal issues in a completely different way than before. Now, we must start an in-depth discussion to present a new paradigm to respond to new issues in artificial intelligence.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 임병웅, "理智 특허법" 한빛지적소유권센터 2017

      2 김인배, "理智 디자인보호법" 한빛지적소유권센터 2017

      3 허영, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2022

      4 성낙인, "헌법학" 법문사 2015

      5 백수원, "헌법상 인공지능 규제의 범위와 방향에 대한 시론적 고찰" 미국헌법학회 29 (29): 2018

      6 이규홍 ; 정필운, "헌법 제22조 제2항 관련 개헌론에 관한 소고-지적재산권조항의 재정립에 관하여-" 법조협회 (650) : 2010

      7 "특허법원 2016.3.31. 선고 2015허8370 판결"

      8 윤선희, "특허법" 법문사 2012

      9 강명수, "지식재산권 보호의 균형과 헌법의 개정방향" 제주대학교법과정책연구원 2021

      10 신재호, "저작자 개념에 관한 소고" 한국지식재산학회 (61) : 2019

      1 임병웅, "理智 특허법" 한빛지적소유권센터 2017

      2 김인배, "理智 디자인보호법" 한빛지적소유권센터 2017

      3 허영, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2022

      4 성낙인, "헌법학" 법문사 2015

      5 백수원, "헌법상 인공지능 규제의 범위와 방향에 대한 시론적 고찰" 미국헌법학회 29 (29): 2018

      6 이규홍 ; 정필운, "헌법 제22조 제2항 관련 개헌론에 관한 소고-지적재산권조항의 재정립에 관하여-" 법조협회 (650) : 2010

      7 "특허법원 2016.3.31. 선고 2015허8370 판결"

      8 윤선희, "특허법" 법문사 2012

      9 강명수, "지식재산권 보호의 균형과 헌법의 개정방향" 제주대학교법과정책연구원 2021

      10 신재호, "저작자 개념에 관한 소고" 한국지식재산학회 (61) : 2019

      11 이종구, "저작권법상 인공지능 창작물의 저작자와 입법적 보완" 한국경영법률학회 29 (29): 2019

      12 송영식, "저작권법 강의" 세창출판사 2017

      13 오승종, "저작권법" 박영사 2016

      14 송지원, "인공지능의 법인격에 관한 연구 : 권리주체를 중심으로" 단국대학교 대학원 2017

      15 김나루, "인공지능으로 인한 법적 문제와 그 대안에 관한 연구" 홍익대학교 법학연구소 19 (19): 2018

      16 김진우, "인공지능에 대한 전자인 제도 도입의 필요성과 실현방안에 관한 고찰" 한국법학원 (171) : 2019

      17 전삼현, "인공지능에 관한 저작권법 개정에 관한 연구" 숭실대학교 대학원 2022

      18 정상조, "인공지능시대의 저작권법 과제" 한국저작권위원회 (여름) : 2018

      19 김윤명, "인공지능과 지식재산권 문제 : 인공지능이 만들어낸 현상에 대한 우답(愚答)" 2016

      20 한지영, "인공지능과 법 : 인공지능 창작물의 권리귀속에 관한 검토" 아주대학교 법학연구소 15 (15): 2022

      21 김윤명, "인공지능(로봇)의 법적 쟁점에 대한 시론적 고찰" 한국정보법학회 20 (20): 2016

      22 이상미, "인공지능(AI)창작물의 저작권자는 누구인가" 한남대학교 과학기술법연구원 22 (22): 2016

      23 김승래 ; 이창성, "인공지능(AI)의 창작물에 대한 지식재산권 보호 방안 : 특허권과 저작권 보호를 중심으로" 18 (18): 2018

      24 차상육, "인공지능(AI)과 지적재산권의 새로운 쟁점 : 저작권법을 중심으로" 법조협회 (723) : 2017

      25 박호현 ; 김종호, "인공지능 창작활동에 대한 논의" 11 (11): 2021

      26 조연하, "인공지능 창작물의 저작권적 쟁점 : 저작물성과 저작자 판단을 중심으로" 한국언론법학회 19 (19): 2020

      27 손승우, "인공지능 창작물의 저작권 보호" 한국정보법학회 20 (20): 2016

      28 최재원, "인공지능 창작물에 대한 저작권의 주체" 중앙대학교 법학연구원 11 (11): 2017

      29 김현경, "인공지능 창작물에 대한 법적 취급 차별화 방안 검토 : ‘방식주의’의 도입을 중심으로" 충남대학교 법학연구소 29 (29): 2018

      30 김형건, "인공지능 시대 도래에 따른 저작자(Author)개념 재정립에 관한 연구" 한국법제연구원 2017

      31 송호영, "인공지능 로봇은 법인격을 가질 수 있는가?" 한국법학원 2021

      32 김시열, "인공지능 등 비자연인의 특허권 주체 인정을 위한 인격 부여 가능성에 관한 연구" 숭실대학교 법학연구소 39 : 2017

      33 송영현, "인공지능 담론과 법의 사회적 현재성" 18 (18): 2018

      34 정진근, "오픈소스 플랫폼에서의 인공지능에 의한 창작의 보호" 강원대학교 비교법학연구소 54 : 2018

      35 임원선, "실무자를 위한 저작권법" 한국저작권위원회 2012

      36 송진호, "법인의 인격권에 관한 검토 : 최근의 논의들을 중심으로" 법조협회 65 (65): 2016

      37 고인석, "로봇이 책임과 권한의 주체일 수 있는가" 새한철학회 67 : 2012

      38 "대법원 2014. 12.11 선고 2012도 16066 판결"

      39 "대법원 2009.12.10. 선고 2007도7181 판결"

      40 "대법원 1995.11..14 선고 94도 2238 판결"

      41 "대법원 1993.6.8 선고 93다3073 판결"

      42 "대법원 1979.12.28. 선고 79도1482 판결"

      43 "대법원 1977.12.13. 선고 77누76 판결"

      44 Lawrence Lessig, "The Future of Ideas : The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World" Vintage Books 2002

      45 Rostam J. Neuwirth, "The EU Arificial Intelligence Act : Regulating Subliminal AI Systems" Routledge 2023

      46 John H. Gibbons, "Intellectual Property Rights in an Age of Electronics and Information" U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment 1986

      47 Mark Perry, "From Music Tracks to Google Maps: Who Owns Computergenerated Works?" 2010

      48 Edward Lee, "Digital Originality" 14 : 2012

      49 William T. Ralston, "Copyright in Computer-Composed Music" 52 : 281-, 2005

      50 Timothy L. Butler, "Can a computer be an author copyright aspects of artificial intelligence" 4 (4): 1982

      51 Kalin Hristov, "Artificial Intelligence and the Copyright Delemma" 57 : 431-, 2017

      52 Pamela Samuelson, "Allcating Ownership Right in Computer-Generated Works" 47 : 1985

      53 김훈주, "AI(Aritificial Intelligence)에 대한 법인격 부여의 타당성 검토" 충북대학교 법학연구소 31 (31): 2020

      54 윤선희 ; 이승훈, "4차 산업혁명에 대응한 지적재산권 제도의 활용:인공지능 창작물 보호제도를 중심으로" 한국지식재산학회 (52) : 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼