RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 AHCI SCOPUS

    제1·2차 만주 폐페스트의 유행과 일제의 방역행정(1910-1921) = The First and the Second Pneumonic Plague in Manchuria and the Preventive Measure of Japanese Colonial Authorities(1910-1921)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99634631

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    During the first plague epidemic in Manchuria (1910-1911), Japanese Government-General in Korea had not reported a plague patient at all in official. This did not mean the preventive measure of colonial authorities was successful. Their prevention program and measure were operated inadequately. They focused on instigative and sometimes irrelevant aspects such as rat removal to restore order in the colony. The quarantine facility was insufficient so that some people could not be effectively isolated. The reason pneumonic plague did not spread from Manchuria to Korea was mostly because Chinese coolie did not enter Korea.
    The colonial government promulgated Jeonyeombyeong Yebangryeong (Preventive Regulation of Contagious Disease) in June 5, 1915. This regulation aimed at unitary control by police and was strengthened 10-day quarantine. After the March First Movement, the colonial government tried to change imperial policy to cultural policy. The military police and civilian police were bifurcated and governors took charge of health administration. However, sanitary police still played important role for preventive measure.
    The preventive policy of colonial government experienced important change from cholera epidemic between 1919 and 1920. The death toll of two years had exceeded 20,000 people. During the cholera outbreak of two years, quarantine and isolation were emerged as important tools to prevent disease transmission, and were well-appointed more now than before. To prevent cholera epidemic, the colonial government strengthened house-tohouse inspection as well as seaport quarantine, train quarantine, passenger quarantine. House-to-house inspection detected sixty percentage of cholera patients.
    When the second Manchurian plague spread in Korea in 1920-1921, this plague was known to Korean people as pneumonic plague. The colonial government propagated and educated pneumonic plague, and urged to wear a mask through Heuksabyeong Yebang Simdeuk (The Notandum for Plague Prevention).
    The colonial government did not focused on rat removal any more. They pointed out Chinese coolie as a source of infection. Though they did not know exact information and analysis on pneumonic plague, the preventive measure of the second plague in Manchuria was successful due to the well-equipped disinfection system such as house-to-house inspection and nationwide quarantine made by cholera prevention.
    While the first prevention of plague in Manchuria was successful despite rubbish preventive system, the second prevention of plague in Manchuria was successful due to the well-equipped disinfection system in spite of occurring plague patients.
    번역하기

    During the first plague epidemic in Manchuria (1910-1911), Japanese Government-General in Korea had not reported a plague patient at all in official. This did not mean the preventive measure of colonial authorities was successful. Their prevention pro...

    During the first plague epidemic in Manchuria (1910-1911), Japanese Government-General in Korea had not reported a plague patient at all in official. This did not mean the preventive measure of colonial authorities was successful. Their prevention program and measure were operated inadequately. They focused on instigative and sometimes irrelevant aspects such as rat removal to restore order in the colony. The quarantine facility was insufficient so that some people could not be effectively isolated. The reason pneumonic plague did not spread from Manchuria to Korea was mostly because Chinese coolie did not enter Korea.
    The colonial government promulgated Jeonyeombyeong Yebangryeong (Preventive Regulation of Contagious Disease) in June 5, 1915. This regulation aimed at unitary control by police and was strengthened 10-day quarantine. After the March First Movement, the colonial government tried to change imperial policy to cultural policy. The military police and civilian police were bifurcated and governors took charge of health administration. However, sanitary police still played important role for preventive measure.
    The preventive policy of colonial government experienced important change from cholera epidemic between 1919 and 1920. The death toll of two years had exceeded 20,000 people. During the cholera outbreak of two years, quarantine and isolation were emerged as important tools to prevent disease transmission, and were well-appointed more now than before. To prevent cholera epidemic, the colonial government strengthened house-tohouse inspection as well as seaport quarantine, train quarantine, passenger quarantine. House-to-house inspection detected sixty percentage of cholera patients.
    When the second Manchurian plague spread in Korea in 1920-1921, this plague was known to Korean people as pneumonic plague. The colonial government propagated and educated pneumonic plague, and urged to wear a mask through Heuksabyeong Yebang Simdeuk (The Notandum for Plague Prevention).
    The colonial government did not focused on rat removal any more. They pointed out Chinese coolie as a source of infection. Though they did not know exact information and analysis on pneumonic plague, the preventive measure of the second plague in Manchuria was successful due to the well-equipped disinfection system such as house-to-house inspection and nationwide quarantine made by cholera prevention.
    While the first prevention of plague in Manchuria was successful despite rubbish preventive system, the second prevention of plague in Manchuria was successful due to the well-equipped disinfection system in spite of occurring plague patients.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 머리말
    • 2. 제1차 만주 폐페스트의 유행과 쥐잡기운동
    • 3. 방역법령의 정비와 1919-20년 콜레라방역의 성과
    • 4. 제2차 만주 폐페스트의 유행과 폐페스트 인식의 변화
    • 5. 맺음말
    • 1. 머리말
    • 2. 제1차 만주 폐페스트의 유행과 쥐잡기운동
    • 3. 방역법령의 정비와 1919-20년 콜레라방역의 성과
    • 4. 제2차 만주 폐페스트의 유행과 폐페스트 인식의 변화
    • 5. 맺음말
    • 참고 문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 대한감염학회, "한국전염병사" 군자출판사 2010

    2 신동원, "한국근대보건의료사" 한울 1997

    3 박윤재, "한국 근대의학의 기원" 혜안 2005

    4 신규환, "질병의 사회사: 동아시아 의학의 재발견" 살림 2006

    5 박윤재, "조선총독부의 지방 의료정책과 의료 소비" 역사문제연구소 13 (13): 161-183, 2009

    6 정근식, "식민지 위생경찰의 형성과 변화, 그리고 유산: 식민지 통치성의 시각에서" 한국사회사학회 90 : 221-270, 2011

    7 정민재, "근대 의학 수용에 대한 자주적 노력-개항에서 대한제국시기까지" 21 : 2006

    8 "警務月報"

    9 "第87-2ペスト豫防の件, 南滿洲ペスト一件』, アジア歷史資料センタ, 海軍省-公文備考-M44-92-1270"

    10 焦潤明, "淸末東三省鼠疫災難及防疫措施硏究" 北京師範大學出版社 2011

    1 대한감염학회, "한국전염병사" 군자출판사 2010

    2 신동원, "한국근대보건의료사" 한울 1997

    3 박윤재, "한국 근대의학의 기원" 혜안 2005

    4 신규환, "질병의 사회사: 동아시아 의학의 재발견" 살림 2006

    5 박윤재, "조선총독부의 지방 의료정책과 의료 소비" 역사문제연구소 13 (13): 161-183, 2009

    6 정근식, "식민지 위생경찰의 형성과 변화, 그리고 유산: 식민지 통치성의 시각에서" 한국사회사학회 90 : 221-270, 2011

    7 정민재, "근대 의학 수용에 대한 자주적 노력-개항에서 대한제국시기까지" 21 : 2006

    8 "警務月報"

    9 "第87-2ペスト豫防の件, 南滿洲ペスト一件』, アジア歷史資料センタ, 海軍省-公文備考-M44-92-1270"

    10 焦潤明, "淸末東三省鼠疫災難及防疫措施硏究" 北京師範大學出版社 2011

    11 "每日申報"

    12 金穎穗, "植民地朝鮮におけるコレラの大流行と防疫對策の変化: 1919年と1920年の流行を中心に" (8) : 2012

    13 "東亞日報"

    14 朝鮮總督府警務局, "朝鮮防疫統計" 朝鮮總督府警務局 1941

    15 "朝鮮警察槪要"

    16 "朝鮮警察之槪要"

    17 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮總督府施政年報(1941)" 朝鮮總督府 1943

    18 "朝鮮總督府官報"

    19 "朝鮮日報"

    20 "朝鮮新報"

    21 "朝鮮彙報"

    22 "明治四十三四年「ペスト」流行誌"

    23 朝鮮總督府, "大正9年コレラ病虎防疫誌" 朝鮮總督府 1921

    24 朝鮮總督府, "大正8年虎列刺病防疫誌" 朝鮮總督府 1920

    25 "京城新報"

    26 "ペスト防疫施設報告書(其35~其39)" 關東都督府臨時防疫部

    27 飯島涉, "ペストと近代中國" 硏文出版 2000

    28 Sihn Kyu-hwan, "Unexpected Success: The Spread of Manchurian Plague and the Response of Japanese Colonial Rule in Korea, 1910-1911" 유네스코한국위원회 49 (49): 165-182, 2009

    29 Wu Lien-teh, "The Second Pneumonic Plague Epidemic in Manchuria, 1920-21. I. A General Survey of the Outbreak and Its Course" 21 (21): 1920

    30 Seon Hsiang-lin Lei, "Sovereignty and the Microscope: Constituting Notifiable Disease and Containing the Manchurian Plague, In Health and Hygiene in Chinese East Asia" Duke University Press 2010

    31 Park Yunjae, "Sanitizing Korea: Anti-Cholera Activities of the Police in Early Colonial Korea" 규장각한국학연구원 23 (23): 151-172, 2010

    32 Wu Lien-teh, "Plague in the Orient with Special Reference to the Manchurian Outbreaks" 36 : 1922

    33 Carl F. Nathan, "Plague Prevention and Politics in Manchuria, 1910~1931" Mass. 1967

    34 Wu Lien-Teh, "Plague Fighter: The Autobiography of a Modern Chinese Physician" Cambridge 1959

    35 백선례, "1919·20년 식민지 조선의 콜레라 방역활동: 방역당국과 조선인의 대응을 중심으로" 한국사학회 (101) : 205-240, 2011

    36 권기하, "1910년대 총독부의 위생사업과 식민지 '신민'의 형성" 연세대학교 대학원 2010

    37 박윤재, "1910年代 初 日帝의 페스트 防疫活動과 朝鮮支配, In 河炫綱敎授定年紀念論叢: 韓國史의 構造와 展開" 혜안 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-07-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Medical History KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 의사학
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.81 0.81 1.04
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.97 0.91 2.084 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼