이념성향에 따른 체육정책 방향 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Abstract

Sports in South Korea has been a convenient tool for the military regimes up until the 6thRepublic to turn the people's attention away from the politics and achieve their diplomatic goals as they lacked due political legitimacy. With the ever-rising living condition of the people and their growing request for an improved quality of life in the wake of the successful implementation of the direct presidential election system and Seoul Olympic Games, the South Korean government came up with the policy initiatives on the sports for all. The study started from an assumption that the ideological leaning of each successive government has a decisive influence on the directions of the sport policies, and its importance is all the more relevant to understand the formation of the sports policies, especially in the recent political situation where there is a stark division between the liberal and conservative political group.
This study was implemented in the form of narrative process based on the archival research which focused on analyzing archival sources and administrative data. First, the ideological leaning of each successive administration from the 6thRepublic to Lee Myung Bak administration was described followed by an analysis on the sports policies of each administration.
The results revealed through such research process are as shown below:

1. It was discovered based on the research on the political ideology and associated policies of each administration that the 6th Republic, the Civilian Government and Lee Myung Bak Administration were proven to be conservative government, whereas the People's Government and the Participatory Government was each proven to be a liberal administration in terms of their political leaning.
2. The 6th Republic showed more interest on the Sport for All but kept their support to the elite sports sector with the goal of scoring excellent performances in the Olympic Games thereby boosting the country's prestige in the international stage and earning the political legitimacy.
3. The Civilian Government, whose day to day governing was founded on the 'Small Government', markedly scaled back the government-led concept in the sports. Despite such governing spirit, the administration still managed the related budget and provided financial support for the participation of the Olympic Games thereby concentrating the policy focus on the elite sport.
4. The People's Government still paid attention to the elite sport in an attempt to recover the national prestige which was damaged in the wake of the Asian Financial Crisis while successfully completing the World Cup Games as a host country. However, it also stressed the importance of the Sports for All in a bid to realize the vision of welfare society through sports. The Administration's favorable relationship with North Korea was evident in the sports as well which prompted an active exchange in the sports between the two Koreas.
5. The Participatory Government put its interest on the people's participation in the sport, which again led to development of the sports for all. And the administration also paid significant attention to sports for the disabled and older people. The administration paid attention to the welfare of the elite athletes thereby coming up with fresh new legislations.
6. Lee Myung Bak administration seemed to focus on promoting environment conducive to thesports for all. However, it still focused on advancing the operation system of the elite sports as well as on the hosting of various international sports events. It also strove to boost the brand reputation of the country through the establishment the national brand through Taekwondo.

Based on the said conclusions, it was confirmed that the liberal governments concentrated generally on improving the people's general quality of life and improve living condition of the country, while the conservative governments put priority on the elite sports to boost the country's reputation through sports. However, such policy direction was not lopsided to either direction but better be interpreted as differences in their policy priority according to their respective ideological leaning. And it was also confirmed that the implementation process of the policies differed depending on the given political situation. This finding suggests that the sport exchanges between the North and South Korea can have a significant impact on the future diplomatic development.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목 차
• Ⅰ. 서 론 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
• 2. 연구의 내용 3
• 3. 연구의 방법 및 범위 4
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 5
• 1. 이념의 개념 5
• 2. 진보-보수의 구분 7
• 1) 좌-우 7
• 2) 반공 이데올로기의 거부․폐기 - 유지․존속 8
• 3) 자유주의와 권위주의 8
• 4) 탈근대 가치 - 근대 가치 9
• 3. 체육정책의 의의 11
• 1) 정책의 의의 11
• 2) 체육정책의 의의 12
• Ⅲ. 정권별 이념성향과 체육정책 14
• 1. 제6공화국(1988~1992) 14
• 1) 제6공화국의 이념성향 14
• 2) 제6공화국 체육정책 15
• 2. 문민정부(1993~1998) 22
• 1) 문민정부의 이념성향 22
• 2) 문민정부의 체육정책 23
• 3. 국민의 정부(1998~2002) 36
• 1) 국민의 정부의 이념성향 36
• 2) 국민의 정부의 체육정책 37
• 4. 참여정부(2003~2008) 49
• 1) 참여정부의 이념성향 49
• 2) 참여정부의 체육정책 50
• 5. 이명박 정부(2008~2013) 62
• 1) 이명박 정부의 이념성향 62
• 2) 이명박 정부의 체육정책 63
• Ⅳ. 각 정권의 체육 정책 특성 비교 76
• 1. 체육 정책의 계획과 추진 전략 76
• 1) 각 정권의 정책기조 76
• 2) 각 정권의 체육정책의 목표 및 추진전략 77
• 3) 국제체육 정책 목표 90
• 4) 남북체육 정책목표 92
• 2. 체육행정 조직 및 재정 95
• 1) 각 정권별 체육행정 조직 95
• 2) 체육재정(정부예산 대비 체육예산) 98
• 3) 체육 분야별 예산 99
• 4) 체육진흥재원 101
• 3. 주요 체육정책 추진실적 103
• 1) 생활체육 분야 103
• 2) 엘리트체육 분야 106
• 3) 국제체육 분야 107
• 4) 남북체육교류 109
• Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 111
• 1. 결론 111
• 2. 제언 114
• 참 고 문 헌 116
• Abstract 121